
A digital signature algorithm is a cryptographic method that uses a private key to "sign" and a public key to "verify" messages, proving both their origin and integrity. Think of it as placing a verifiable stamp on an electronic document—visible to all, but without hiding its contents.
A private key is a confidential, randomly generated number known only to its holder. The public key is derived from the private key and serves as a public identifier for signature verification. Digital signatures answer two fundamental questions: Who sent the message? Has it been tampered with in transit?
In blockchain, the "message" is often transaction data or authorization information. Nodes will only package your transaction into a block after verifying the signature with your public key.
The basic process of a digital signature algorithm involves generating a key pair, signing a message, and allowing others to verify the signature using the public key. The core principle: only the private key can sign, but anyone can verify.
For example, ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) uses a one-time random value in each signature. This random value must be unpredictable and never reused, as poor randomness can expose your private key.
Digital signature algorithms are essential for transaction confirmation, permission authorization, and message authentication in Web3. Without signatures, blockchain nodes cannot trust the source of transactions.
Additionally, many exchange APIs require "signatures." For instance, Gate's API uses HMAC (Hash-based Message Authentication Code) for request signing. While HMAC also verifies source and integrity, it uses a shared secret instead of a public/private key pair.
Common digital signature algorithms include RSA, ECDSA, Ed25519, and BLS, each differing in security, speed, signature size, and implementation complexity.
Most wallets automate digital signing using digital signature algorithms, but the process can be outlined in clear steps:
On Gate, on-chain withdrawals follow this signing and verification flow. For API requests (often using HMAC), strict server-side checks also ensure requests cannot be forged.
Digital signatures frequently work in tandem with hash functions. Hashing transforms data of any length into a fixed-size digest—a unique "fingerprint" for each file.
Signatures are typically applied to digests rather than raw messages for improved efficiency and reduced risk when handling large messages. If any part of the message changes, so does its digest—invalidating the signature.
Common hash functions include SHA-256 and Keccak-256. For example, Bitcoin uses double SHA-256 for transaction digests; Ethereum uses Keccak-256, often referred to as a SHA3 variant.
Digital signature algorithms are designed for "proof and integrity," while encryption algorithms focus on "confidentiality." Their objectives are distinct but often confused.
A digital signature does not hide content; it assures others that "this message was sent by me and hasn’t been altered." Encryption transforms content into ciphertext readable only by someone with the decryption key.
In practice, applications may use both: encrypted chat protects message privacy while digital signatures secure headers or critical fields for authenticity and integrity.
The choice of digital signature algorithm depends on chain standards, ecosystem tools, and performance needs—each blockchain makes different trade-offs.
As of October 2024:
For scenarios demanding maximum throughput and simplicity, Ed25519 is common; for compatibility with Ethereum or Bitcoin ecosystems, ECDSA is preferred; for consensus or cross-chain use cases requiring aggregated signatures, BLS is ideal.
Signature size and verification costs also matter: RSA signatures are relatively large and slow—rarely used on-chain; Ed25519 has fixed 64-byte signatures with fast verification; BLS signatures in Ethereum’s consensus layer are 96 bytes compressed but can aggregate hundreds or thousands into one—minimizing overall verification cost.
The main risks in using digital signature algorithms are private key leakage and accidental authorization through unintended signing. Mitigation centers on secure key management and cautious signing practices.
Digital signature algorithms use private keys for signing and public keys for verification—solving "who sent this message" and "has it been changed" issues of trust. They work alongside hash functions (typically signing message digests) and differ from encryption by not hiding content. Most blockchain transactions rely on ECDSA or Ed25519; consensus mechanisms and cross-chain protocols often utilize BLS aggregation. In practice, focus on private key security, message clarity, and randomness quality; on platforms like Gate, digital signatures are fundamental for network acceptance of transactions. Algorithm choice depends on chain standards, performance requirements, and ecosystem compatibility—the ultimate goal is reliable proof of identity and data integrity.
A digital signature uses your private key to cryptographically authenticate data—proving you control that private key. A digital certificate is a trusted file containing your public key information issued by a third-party authority. In simple terms: a digital signature is like your handwritten signature; a certificate is like your ID card. In blockchain wallets, signatures authorize transactions while certificates validate identity or publish information.
If a signature is altered during transmission, validators will immediately detect this and reject the transaction or message. Blockchain networks automatically discard invalid transactions to ensure security. This is one of the greatest strengths of digital signatures—even a single character change causes verification failure.
No—it is not secure. If your private key leaks, others can sign as you—effectively impersonating your identity. Protecting your private key is critical: use hardware wallets, never share keys online, regularly monitor account activity. If you suspect exposure, move assets to a new wallet immediately.
Signature-based login is more secure than passwords—passwords are vulnerable to brute-force attacks or phishing scams. Signing requires you to possess your private key locally; no third party ever sees it. Platforms like Gate offer signature-based login so you can prove identity without submitting a password—the private key always remains under your control.
The underlying cryptography is identical across devices—both follow the same standards. The main differences are convenience versus security: mobile wallets are more portable but potentially exposed to greater risks; desktop wallets offer richer features but may have higher usage barriers. Hardware wallets (cold storage wallets) operate offline during signing—delivering maximum security. Choose based on usage frequency and asset value.


