
Seed round funding refers to the initial capital that a project secures during its “germination” stage, used to turn an idea into a prototype, validate market demand, and build the minimum viable team. In Web3, seed round funding is often coordinated with future token issuance plans, ensuring that technology development, community growth, and regulatory compliance progress in parallel.
Seed rounds are typically smaller in scale but have a significant impact on the project's direction. They shape the initial roadmap, key hires, and determine whether the project can proceed to private rounds or public offerings. For investors, the seed round carries the highest risk and least available information, so its terms focus heavily on investor protection and restrictions.
Seed funding is crucial in Web3 because blockchain products must simultaneously validate technical feasibility and community adoption—both require resources. Early costs often include security audits, tokenomics design, and collaborating with legal advisors for compliance.
Over the past year (through early 2026), early-stage funding trends have shifted toward a “equity + token warrant” model to balance regulatory requirements with future token incentives. This approach allows teams to first solidify core modules—such as wallets, smart contracts, and infrastructure—before expanding to broader issuance and trading scenarios.
Seed round capital typically comes from founders’ own funds, angel investors, Web3-focused venture funds, industry peers making follow-on investments, and occasionally community or DAO support. Some exchanges also participate in early-stage rounds as strategic investors, laying groundwork for future ecosystem collaboration.
In practice, if a project plans for a public offering or exchange listing (for example, joining Gate’s Startup program), it may bring in legal, compliance, or technical consultants early on to ensure smooth integration later.
Seed round funding commonly utilizes straightforward agreements such as “money now for future equity or tokens.” The most prevalent instruments are SAFE and SAFT.
SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) acts as a “pre-purchase coupon” for equity. Investors provide capital upfront; when the project sets a valuation in a later round, their investment converts into shares at an agreed discount or valuation cap—no immediate equity stake or complex pricing required.
SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) functions as a “pre-purchase coupon” for tokens. Investors fund the project early and receive tokens at a set proportion once the tokens are generated and can be legally distributed. SAFTs typically include vesting and release schedules to prevent short-term selling and ensure regulatory compliance.
Convertible notes are another option—effectively short-term loans that convert to equity under agreed terms. In Web3, teams may use a combination of “equity SAFE + token SAFT” to address both company ownership and token incentive delivery.
The choice depends on project nature and regulatory environment. Projects focused on foundational software or services often favor equity; protocol-driven or application projects with strong token incentives may opt for token allocation to motivate users and validators.
Equity offers the advantage of mature legal frameworks and clear governance; tokens provide immediate network incentives and higher community engagement. However, token distribution involves compliance considerations and lock-up designs that require careful planning. Many teams opt for a combination: using SAFE to secure future equity for investors and SAFT to outline token allocation and vesting.
Step 1: Prepare a concise pitch deck (10–12 slides), covering problem/opportunity, solution, technical architecture, target users, business model, milestones, team, funding amount, and use of proceeds.
Step 2: Design clear tokenomics: total supply, allocation (team, ecosystem, investors, reserves), vesting/release schedules, and rationale for sustainable growth.
Step 3: Establish legal and compliance structures: company registration location, cap table, board setup; if tokens are involved, prepare SAFT documentation and legal opinions to ensure compliance paths and KYC/AML processes.
Step 4: Present technical prototypes and security plans: MVP, codebase excerpts, testnet deployments, scheduled third-party security audits with budget.
Step 5: Provide data and roadmap: user research, beta feedback, milestone projections (testnet, mainnet, integrations), and ecosystem partnership plans (e.g., listing on Gate or preparing for community events).
Step 6: Define funding terms: target amount, valuation cap or discount rate, instrument type (SAFE/SAFT/convertible note), vesting/release rules, disclosure frequency, and investor rights.
Seed round funding impacts investor ownership through “valuation caps” and “discounts.” A valuation cap sets the maximum price at which conversion occurs (for equity or tokens); a discount grants investors a reduced price when the next round is priced.
For example: If a SAFE agreement sets a $10 million valuation cap but the next round is priced at $20 million, the investor converts at $10 million—receiving more shares. Typical discounts range from 10%–30%, rewarding early backers. These structures ultimately cause dilution: as new capital enters, founder and early employee ownership percentages decrease. Teams must balance fundraising needs against dilution risk.
Seed rounds target a small group of early investors with incomplete information and flexible terms; private rounds usually follow once a product and data exist—larger amounts with stricter due diligence; IEOs are public token offerings with broad visibility requiring robust compliance and technical readiness.
In practice, teams often consider public activities on exchanges only after completing seed rounds and hitting major milestones. For example, Gate’s Startup program allows projects to sell tokens to wider audiences and engage communities—these activities fall outside seed funding and belong to later public phases.
For teams: Risks include premature valuation leading to pressure in later rounds; overly restrictive terms on information rights or lock-up periods; and compliance risks in token distribution. For investors: Delayed product delivery, technology failures, or regulatory changes can affect future equity or token access.
If using SAFTs, be sure to set reasonable vesting and release periods; prepare compliance documentation along with KYC/AML workflows. Safeguard all agreements and signed documents to prevent loss or tampering. Exercise caution with all financial operations; this is not investment advice—consult licensed legal or financial professionals as needed.
Step 1: Invest in product development and security—complete core features, conduct code audits, implement bug bounty programs to ensure stable mainnet launch.
Step 2: Strengthen compliance and governance—build robust company governance structures, set up information disclosure processes and audit plans; clarify community governance and voting mechanisms if applicable.
Step 3: Build ecosystem and community—launch developer programs, user education initiatives, regular updates, deliver roadmap milestones; lay groundwork for larger events on platforms like Gate.
Step 4: Prepare for market growth and liquidity—partner with compliant market makers/data services; establish transparent metrics (daily active users, retention rates, protocol usage) for next funding rounds or public offerings.
In summary: Seed round funding marks the transition from “idea” to “verifiable product” in Web3. Understanding SAFE and SAFT, balancing equity with token design, preparing comprehensive materials, and negotiating prudent terms are crucial for success. Both teams and investors must prioritize security, compliance, and sustainable development to progress confidently to the next stage.
Typical seed rounds range from $500K–$5M depending on sector and team background. Early-stage projects may need only tens of thousands to launch; high-profile teams or hot sectors may raise more. It is best to set fundraising targets based on actual operating costs, team size, and development goals rather than chasing large amounts blindly.
Founder equity is diluted based on investment amount versus valuation. For example: raising $5M at a $20M valuation means founders must allocate 20% equity. Before fundraising, understand how SAFE/SAFT affect future ownership; reserve option pools for key team members to maintain control of the company.
Unspent capital should be managed strategically—used for team expansion, R&D, marketing campaigns or kept as emergency reserves. Communicate clearly with investors per funding agreements; avoid idle funds leading to waste. Maintain transparent records of fund usage for future fundraising readiness.
Angel investors are usually individuals providing smaller checks ($10K–$100K) with flexible involvement; seed VCs are professional firms investing larger sums with rigorous due diligence and ongoing oversight. Angels focus more on team potential; VCs emphasize business model viability and market opportunity—their risk tolerance and return expectations differ accordingly.
It depends on project stage and investor needs. Equity is preferable in early tech validation phases—lower investor risk; token financing suits projects with established products/community base—attracting more participants. Consult legal experts regarding local regulations; consider whether your tokenomics model is sound to avoid unnecessary legal risks.


