Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
GPU computing power is becoming a core resource in the Web3 ecosystem—this trend has shifted from the fringes to the mainstream. Recently, a new type of project has emerged that attempts to directly map GPU computing power onto the blockchain, rather than treating it solely as a mining tool.
Take NVIDIA Compute Network(NCN) as an example. Its token $NVAI has an interesting design logic. The project team does not emphasize profit expectations or price appreciation; instead, they dedicate a significant portion of their explanation to a core mechanism—Proof of Compute.
In simple terms, the operation logic of this system is: GPUs perform real AI tasks(training, inference, generation), with these computational processes recorded on-chain in real-time. The amount of tasks completed is recorded on the ledger accordingly. The benefit of this approach is that computing power shifts from being a costly resource to a used resource—meeting AI computational needs while enabling value settlement.
Interestingly, this architecture naturally aligns with NVIDIA’s own tech stack. Tools like CUDA, RTX, and Jetson are originally core components of compute resource management. The new project extends this system onto the blockchain, rather than stitching together a story afterward. From a bottom-up design perspective, there is indeed logical consistency.
Of course, the key factor for such projects is timing. Early participation and late follow-up often differ greatly. If you are interested in AI + compute power + public chains, similar projects are worth understanding. Missing the initial window makes it difficult to have the same opportunities again.
The exploration of tokenizing compute power is still in its early stages. What it will develop into remains uncertain. But from a technical perspective, turning GPUs into on-chain resources rather than mere consumables is a concept worth paying attention to.
Don't be greedy; while there is an initial window, historical data shows that such computing power tokens are prone to becoming capital pools. It's worth deploying but set proper stop-losses.
This is true AI+ blockchain integration, not just hype. The previous fake GPU projects should reflect on themselves.
The Proof of Compute mechanism has some substance, but why is the project unwilling to disclose the fundraising list? This alone warrants caution.
Another capital pool? Not necessarily, but the profit curves for early participants and late followers differ greatly. Doing homework is very important.
Proof of computing power > profit promises, I agree with this logic. But what about the actual implementation? Data shows that similar projects' verification mechanisms often have vulnerabilities.
It looks reliable, but don't be fooled by NVIDIA's halo. Does the project really have enough infrastructure support? That question remains significant.