#DAO治理 The recent DAO controversy with Aave is actually a great learning example. The founder was honest about the issues—improving the alignment of interests between Labs and token holders is indeed necessary, which in turn demonstrates that decentralized governance can self-correct.

Key data you should pay attention to: DAO this year generated $140 million in revenue, surpassing the total of the past three years, and this treasury fund is fully controlled by the holders. What does this mean for us? Project teams are increasingly valuing the voices of token holders, and future airdrops and incentive mechanisms will be more transparent and aligned with community interests.

My advice is, don’t be scared by the controversy. Instead, observe projects that actively participate in DAO voting and maintain high transparency—these projects tend to have more stable long-term value. If you're evaluating the potential for an airdrop from a project, look at its treasury governance and communication mechanisms with holders—these are direct indicators of the project's maturity and sustainability.

In simple terms, the "tension" within a DAO is actually a healthy signal.