2026-01-17 03:28:19

Worth diving into $FOREST's tokenomics setup—this one peaked at $73m market cap with an interesting twist: the dev didn't pocket any initial allocation. Meanwhile, $SAN's fee structure routes revenue directly to the development team through the platform model. The two projects already show protocol integration signals. The fee redirection mechanism alone could create some compelling utility dynamics if adoption picks up. Early movers are positioning accordingly, and there's real potential here if the fundamentals continue to develop. Keep an eye on how the incentive alignment plays out.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

unrekt.eth

· 01-18 14:46

Developer 0 allocation is interesting, and it shows more sincerity than projects that just go ahead and do it themselves. However, the key is SAN's fee-oriented model; only when the adoption rate increases does it become valuable.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 01-18 03:37

Developers have almost no allocation with this approach, which is quite extreme—reverse incentives? It makes people a bit tempted to buy the dip.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-17 22:29

Developer 0's allocation operation, I have to say, still has some substance; I'm just worried that they might cause some trouble again later.

View OriginalReply0

TokenCreatorOP

· 01-17 21:27

Developer zero allocation? That's an interesting move, but what really matters is the fee redirection part. Only when the adoption rate increases will it be profitable.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-17 03:58

The developer zero initial allocation is a bit harsh, really a foot-voting approach.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-17 03:56

Developers' zero allocation is indeed an interesting move, but it depends on how it will be played out later.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 01-17 03:55

I've really never seen the developer zero-initial allocation trick before... Does this make you more willing to invest?

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-17 03:54

Developers assigning zero tokens is a bit harsh, but it actually makes me feel more confident... Early participants are probably smiling a bit happily now.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-17 03:42

Developer zero allocation? That's a pretty harsh setting, indicating that people are indeed optimistic about long-term development.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-17 03:28

Developer zero initial allocation? That's a pretty bold move, a true endorsement of trust. $FOREST's approach is much cleaner than those projects that mine their own tokens.

View OriginalReply0