A well-known Web3 project's airdrop mechanism has attracted attention. The latest round of airdrop registration surprisingly requires a fee of $3.3, and users cannot confirm their eligibility before registration. This practice has sparked discussions within the community.

Investors who have been involved since the early stages of the project pointed out that there is a clear bias in the allocation process—many well-known individuals who have never actively participated in the ecosystem received substantial allocations, while long-term contributors received relatively limited benefits. This allocation logic has disappointed many ecosystem participants.

Industry observers believe that the project's lack of transparency and fairness in distribution can weaken community trust and also reflect logical issues in the airdrop design of some projects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

MerkleTreeHugger

· 01-22 20:57

$3.3 transaction fee still needs to be paid first to confirm eligibility? Laughing to death, is this an airdrop or a rug pull?

Early veterans are neglected while big influencers enjoy the perks, this logic is truly brilliant.

I advise everyone not to touch this kind of project; once trust is lost, it can't be regained.

Another "transparent governance" project revealing its true nature.

Why should you pay to verify conditions? Isn't this just gambling on our stupidity?

Long-term contributors are treated like air; no wonder more and more people are losing faith in Web3 projects.

This is probably the prelude to a real rug pull.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-20 06:03

It's the same old trick again, first make me pay and then tell me if I qualify? LOL

Long-term players get cut, big V influencers take whatever they want, this logic is just perfect.

What transparency are you talking about? Just rename it "Chives Cutting Fund" already.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 01-20 06:02

$3.3$ USD fee not confirmed yet to claim? Isn't this just a disguised way of scamming users?

Big influencers blindly claiming large amounts, while those of us truly involved in the ecosystem hardly hold any coins. The logic is impeccable.

Another project with trust broken. This has been obvious from the start.

When someone becomes popular, they can just get free airdrops? Brothers, you're still dreaming.

Zero transparency and zero fairness. This is just a pattern of taking a cut and then running away.

I just want to ask, why do those accounts that haven't even used the platform end up getting the most?

Getting scammed again—that's the current state of Web3, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 01-20 06:00

3.3 USD fee, still don't know if I can hit the jackpot. I've seen this trick back in 2021.

Another project claiming to be decentralized but actually doing centralized distribution, hilarious.

Relying on connections to get the big share, while those who actually do the work are left in the dust. Is this Web3?

Wait, why hasn't the community beaten them up yet?

View OriginalReply0

0xSunnyDay

· 01-20 05:58

It's the same trick again, pay first and then see if you meet the criteria? LOL

Big influencers can get airdrops without issues, but us working folks have to pay taxes🤡

Is this what you call the democracy of Web3? I doubt it.

View OriginalReply0