Which institutional private loan is the best? How do the 5 major RWA protocols reshape capital allocation in 2026

Institutional funds are facing an unprecedented dilemma. Transitioning from traditional finance to blockchain deployment is no longer a question of “whether” but “which one is most suitable.” When institutions evaluate where to deploy billions of dollars in private loan assets, five major RWA protocols offer very different paths—Rayls Labs, Ondo Finance, Centrifuge, Canton Network, and Polymesh. This is not just a technical choice but a strategic decision involving privacy, compliance, efficiency, and scale.

If you’re seeking the right on-chain infrastructure for institutions, this analysis will help you understand each platform’s true advantages and limitations.

Market Turning Point: $19.3 Billion in Institutional Capital Ready to On-Chain

Institutional-grade RWA tokenization has evolved from fringe projects to mainstream trend. As of early January 2026, the on-chain asset deployment has approached $19.3 billion—nearly a 3x increase from $6-8 billion at the start of 2024.

This is not a bubble. It’s a genuine transfer of capital.

Actual Composition of Market Segments:

According to the latest snapshot from rwa.xyz, growth trajectories of different asset classes vary greatly:

  • Government bonds and money market funds: about $8-9 billion, 45%-50%, steady growth but largest base
  • Private loan markets: $2-6 billion, 20%-30%, smaller base but fastest-growing sector
  • Tokenized equities: over $400 million, fastest growth, mainly driven by Ondo Finance

For asset managers and banks, this is a critical inflection point: traditional private loans typically offer 8%-12% annualized returns, but with lengthy liquidation cycles and limited liquidity. On-chain deployment enables 24/7 access, T+0 settlement, and transparent returns of 3.3%-4.6% on AAA assets—making it straightforward for CFOs managing tens of billions in idle capital.

Three Core Factors Accelerating “On-Chain Decision-Making”

Actual Yield Arbitrage Appeal

Traditional government bond yields hover around 4%-6%, limited by T+2 settlement. Tokenized versions not only offer comparable or higher returns but also settle in sub-seconds. For institutional finance officers, this translates into tangible yield improvements—especially when managing cash reserves of tens of billions.

Gradual Establishment of Regulatory Frameworks

The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has been enforced in 27 countries; the US SEC is pushing on-chain securities frameworks via “ProjectCrypto”; DTCC’s No-Action Letter allows traditional financial infrastructure providers to legally tokenize assets. Regulation is no longer an obstacle but a catalyst.

Maturity of Infrastructure Reaching a Critical Point

Chronicle Labs has handled over $20 billion in total value locked; security audits by firms like Halborn have certified key RWA protocols. These infrastructures meet the fiduciary standards required by institutions—an essential prerequisite before large-scale deployment.

Centrifuge Leading the Way: Real-World Private Loan Tokenization

Among the five protocols, Centrifuge has achieved what others are still planning—deploying actual institutional capital for private loan tokenization.

By December 2025, Centrifuge’s TVL soared to $1.3–$1.45 billion, driven by real institutional deployment rather than speculative capital. This distinction is crucial.

Real Deployment Cases Demonstrate the Edge of the Most Feasible:

Janus Henderson Partnership

Global asset manager Janus Henderson (managing $373 billion) is deploying its collateralized loan obligation (CLO) products on Centrifuge. The Anemoy AAACLO fund is a fully on-chain AAA-rated CLO managed by Janus Henderson’s investment team—using the same investment process as its $21.4 billion AAACLO ETF. This is not a trial; it’s real capital allocation.

Grove Capital Allocation Plan

Sky ecosystem’s Grove fund has committed $1 billion for private loan distribution, with an initial capital of $50 million. The management team comes from Deloitte, Citigroup, Block Tower Capital, and Hildene Capital Management—each an institutional-grade infrastructure builder.

Why Centrifuge’s Unique Operating Model Is Ideal for Private Loans:

Unlike competitors, Centrifuge directly tokenizes credit at issuance rather than merely packaging off-chain assets:

  1. Issuers create and manage funds through a transparent, streamlined process
  2. Institutional investors allocate stablecoins for investment
  3. Funds flow to borrowers after credit approval
  4. Repayments are automatically proportionally distributed to token holders
  5. AAA assets yield 3.3%-4.6% APY, fully transparent and auditable

This design is most attractive to asset management firms: reducing distribution costs, increasing transparency, and enabling investor bases beyond traditional private equity minimums.

On January 8, 2026, Centrifuge announced a partnership with Chronicle Labs for oracle services—meaning the asset proof framework is now operational, providing cryptographically verified holdings data, transparent NAV calculations, and compliance reporting. For LPs and auditors, this addresses their biggest risk concerns.

Rayls Labs vs. Centrifuge: Bank-Style vs. Asset Management Style—Which Loan Scenario Fits You?

Different institutions have very different definitions of “which is best.” Banks and asset managers have divergent needs. Rayls Labs and Centrifuge exemplify these two paths.

Rayls Labs: Built for Bank Privacy

Rayls positions itself as a compliance-first bridge connecting banks and DeFi. Developed by Brazil’s fintech Parfin, supported by Framework Ventures, ParaFi Capital, Valor Capital, and Alexia Ventures, its architecture is a permissioned, public EVM-compatible L1 blockchain designed for regulated entities.

Rayls’ Enygma privacy stack offers what banks truly need:

  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Protect transaction confidentiality
  • Homomorphic Encryption: Support computations on encrypted data without decryption
  • Native cross-chain and private network operations
  • Confidential Payments: Support atomic swaps and embedded payment delivery
  • Programmable Compliance: Selectively disclose data to designated auditors

Use cases include Brazil’s CBDC cross-border settlement pilot, Núclea’s regulated receivables tokenization, and private node workflows for confidential payment delivery.

On January 8, 2026, Rayls announced completion of a security audit by Halborn—crucial for evaluating production deployment for banks. More importantly, the AmFi alliance (Brazil’s largest private credit tokenization platform) plans to deploy $1 billion in tokenized assets on Rayls by June 2027, with 5 million RLS tokens as rewards.

This represents one of the largest institutional RWA commitments in any blockchain ecosystem today.

Centrifuge vs. Rayls: Which Is Better for You?

Dimension Rayls Labs Centrifuge
Target Institutions Banks, Central Banks, Payment Providers Asset Managers, Loan Originators
Core Privacy Mechanism Zero-Knowledge Proofs Protocol-Level Identity Verification
Deployment Scale (TVL) Not yet public (pending AmFi testing) $1.3–$1.45 billion
Main Use Cases CBDC pilots, Receivables tokenization Janus Henderson $214B assets managed
Liquidity Strategy Prioritizes institutional privacy Multi-asset distribution focus
Suitable Scenarios Bank-level payments, CBDC infrastructure Private credit, fund distribution

In short, if you are a bank or central bank, Rayls is most suitable. If you are an asset manager or fund distributor, Centrifuge has been proven in real deployments.

Ondo Finance: Cross-Chain Tokenized Stocks Expansion Race

Ondo Finance has achieved the fastest expansion from institutional to retail—evolving from a government bond protocol to the largest platform for tokenized public equities.

Snapshot as of January 2026:

  • TVL: $1.93 billion
  • Tokenized stocks: over $400 million, 53% of the market share
  • USDY holdings on Solana: about $176 million

On January 8, 2026, Ondo launched 98 new tokenized assets covering stocks and ETFs in AI, electric vehicles, and thematic investments. This is not a gradual trial but a large-scale rapid push.

Ondo plans to launch tokenized US stocks and ETFs on Solana in Q1 2026—an aggressive move into retail-friendly infrastructure. The product roadmap aims to list over 1,000 tokenized assets.

Notably, while token prices declined, TVL still reached $19.3 billion. The key signal: protocol growth is prioritized over speculation. This growth is mainly driven by institutional government bonds and DeFi protocols’ demand for idle stablecoin yields.

Ondo has established custody relationships with broker-dealers, completed Halborn security audits, and launched products across Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana within six months, creating a formidable lead. Its competitor Backed Finance’s tokenized assets total only about $16.2 million.

However, Ondo faces challenges: price volatility outside trading hours—though tokens can be transferred anytime, pricing still depends on exchange hours, potentially causing 1%-3% arbitrage spreads during US night trading.

Canton Network and Polymesh: Wall Street’s New Infrastructure Choices

Canton Network and Polymesh represent two different answers from traditional finance on “which is the best blockchain.”

Canton Network: DTCC’s On-Chain Migration Plan

Canton is a response to the permissionless DeFi approach by institutional-grade blockchains. Participants include DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation), Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, and Citadel Securities—core infrastructure providers on Wall Street.

In December 2025, Canton announced a partnership with DTCC—this is not just a pilot but a core commitment to building the US securities settlement infrastructure. With SEC No-Action Letter approval, DTCC’s US Treasuries can be native tokenized on Canton, with a planned production MVP in H1 2026.

Canton’s privacy architecture is based on smart contract layer-level design using Daml:

  • Contracts specify which participants can see which data
  • Regulators have full audit access
  • Counterparties can view transaction details
  • Competitors and the public cannot see transaction info
  • State updates propagate atomically across the network

For Wall Street institutions accustomed to Bloomberg terminals and dark pools, this design balances blockchain efficiency with transaction privacy—of course, traditional finance would never expose proprietary trading activities on a transparent public ledger.

On January 8, 2026, Temple Digital Group launched a private trading platform on Canton offering sub-second matching via a central limit order book. Partners include Franklin D. D. (managing $82.8 billion in money market funds) and J.P. Morgan (via JPM Coin for settlement).

Polymesh: Protocol-Level Native Compliance Design

Polymesh stands out with protocol-level compliance rather than complex smart contracts. Designed specifically for regulated securities:

  • Protocol-level identity verification: via licensed KYC providers
  • Embedded transfer rules: non-compliant transactions fail at consensus
  • Atomic settlement: finalizes within 6 seconds

Production integrations include Republic (supporting private securities issuance) and AlphaPoint (over 150 trading venues in 35 countries). The key advantage: no need for custom smart contract audits—protocol automatically adapts to regulatory changes, preventing non-compliant transfers.

Practical Protocol Selection Matrix for Institutions

Based on specific needs, the selection criteria should be:

Highest Privacy Needs → Rayls Labs

  • Use cases: interbank settlement, CBDC, confidential payments
  • Features: zero-knowledge proofs, optional audit disclosures
  • Proven: Brazil CBDC pilot

Tokenized Stocks & Retail Expansion → Ondo Finance

  • Use cases: asset distribution, cross-chain liquidity
  • Features: $1.93B TVL, 98+ assets, Solana support
  • Proven: growth maintained during market downturn

Institutional Lending & Asset Management → Centrifuge

  • Use cases: private credit tokenization, fund distribution
  • Features: $1.3–$1.45B TVL, recognized by Janus Henderson, Grove plan
  • Proven: deployment by $214B asset manager

Wall Street Settlement Infrastructure → Canton Network

  • Use cases: government bond tokenization, institutional settlement
  • Features: DTCC partnership, dark pool privacy, Daml design
  • Proven: MVP delivery in H1 2026

Securities Compliance Priority → Polymesh

  • Use cases: regulated securities issuance, compliant tokens
  • Features: protocol-level identity, non-compliant transfer prevention
  • Proven: integrations with Republic, AlphaPoint

Key Milestones for 2026: Execution Over Architecture

The next 18 months will be decisive. The market no longer believes in blueprints—results are the only measure.

Q1: Ondo launches 98+ stocks on Solana

  • Test if retail-scale issuance can generate sustainable liquidity
  • Success indicator: over 100,000 holders, proving real demand

H1: Canton’s DTCC MVP delivery

  • Validate blockchain’s feasibility in US Treasuries settlement
  • Potential impact: trillions of dollars could move on-chain

Ongoing: Centrifuge’s Grove $1B deployment

  • Test institutional credit tokenization in real capital operations
  • If successful, greatly boost asset managers’ confidence

Ongoing: Rayls’ AmFi $1B target

  • Test privacy infrastructure adoption in private loans
  • Achieve by June 2027, providing real validation for institutional privacy needs

Future Capital Flows for Institutions: Growth Path 2026–2028

Market size has grown from $6-8 billion in early 2024 to $19.7 billion. To reach the $2-4 trillion goal by 2030, 50-100x growth is needed—ambitious but not impossible considering the following factors:

Industry Growth Forecasts:

  • Private loans: from $2-6 billion to $150–200 billion (small base, high growth, contested by Centrifuge and Rayls)
  • Tokenized government bonds: if money market funds migrate on-chain, potential exceeds $5 trillion
  • Real estate & commodities: projected to reach $3–4 trillion (depending on blockchain adoption in property registries)

Milestone of hundreds of billions of dollars expected by 2027–2028

Projected distribution:

  • Private credit: $30–$40 billion
  • Government bonds: $30–$40 billion
  • Tokenized stocks: $20–$30 billion
  • Real estate/commodities: $10–$20 billion

Conclusion: Which Path Is Best for You?

The institutional RWA landscape in early 2026 shows an unexpected trend: no single winner, because no single market dominates.

This is precisely the infrastructure development direction.

Each protocol addresses different problems. Choosing the best is not about the “most advanced blockchain” but about selecting the infrastructure that best solves your specific compliance, operational, and competitive needs.

  • If you are a bank: Rayls offers institutional-grade privacy
  • If you are an asset manager: Centrifuge has proven real-world deployment
  • If retail scale is your goal: Ondo provides cross-chain liquidity
  • If Wall Street settlement infrastructure: Canton offers core settlement solutions
  • If securities compliance is priority: Polymesh is natively designed for regulation

Institutional choices determine everything. These choices will shape the industry landscape over 2026–2028 and beyond.

Execution takes precedence over architecture. Results beat blueprints.

Trillions of assets are migrating—this is happening now.

RWA3,12%
RLS0,3%
ONDO7,56%
CFG37,92%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin