Trade tariffs are escalating again, impacting the global supply chain. In this wave, traditional assets are hit hardest, with stock markets falling sharply, and crypto markets experiencing even greater volatility. Whenever a risk event occurs, market liquidity is quickly drained, and retail investors' assets are often the first to suffer.



The core issue is not about a specific policy itself, but whether your crypto assets have their own "risk resistance system." Most people's approach is still very primitive: they get excited when prices rise, panic when prices fall, and their assets are only passively following the ups and downs, serving no other purpose. This is no different from running naked in uncertainty.

So what is a smart strategy? It is to allocate part of your assets into an income mechanism driven entirely by smart contracts, unaffected by external trade policies. This mechanism relies on mathematics and code, not human decision-making.

How exactly to do it? One idea is to stake mainstream tokens like ETH, BNB, etc., to earn basic yields to counteract asset depreciation. At the same time, lending stablecoins can generate additional returns. This way, you establish a multi-layered income source. During inflation cycles and market volatility, even if token prices face short-term pressure, stable on-chain income can continue to flow in.

This is not gambling, but using data and logic to insulate your assets. Changes in tariff policies? Liquidity drought? No matter how fierce these external shocks are, they cannot shake this internally generated income engine.
ETH-3,51%
BNB-1,85%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 01-25 17:36
Is this the same argument again, that staking stablecoins can resist black swan events? Overthinking it. --- Retail investors are never harmed by policies, but by their own mentality. --- Is smart contract-driven security enough? Code is law, but hackers also love law. --- This is the true leek mentality, thinking that earning passively can help avoid cycles. --- When liquidity dries up, your staking rewards also depend on whether the exchange allows withdrawals. --- Multi-layered yields sound good, but in reality, it's just stacking multiple layers of risk. --- Can an 8% annual yield on ETH staking really hedge against tariff shocks? The math seems a bit off.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlockvip
· 01-25 17:29
Here we go again with this set? Staking yields can't withstand any risks. When the coin price drops 50%, stablecoin lending income is simply not enough to watch. --- Honestly, it's the same old rhetoric. When the real black swan arrives, liquidity still gets frozen. --- I just want to know, in this smart contract-driven yield engine, why didn't it protect people during the 2023 UST collapse? --- Choosing between naked exposure and staking? Feels like just another way to keep gambling. --- Multi-layered yields sound great, but the underlying logic is still a financial game. No one can escape it. --- I've believed this logic three times already, and each time I got slapped in the face during a new bear market.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobiavip
· 01-25 13:18
Again with this set, can staking yields really withstand risks? I think it's just self-comfort, during a downturn they still cut the leeks. The last one to die among retail investors, that's true. What’s the point of tariff shocks? The real issue is that no one has cash anymore. DeFi yield mechanisms sound good, but what if the smart contract gets hacked? Is there insurance, bro? What sounds good is stablecoin lending, but in reality, it's still betting on a rebound in the coin price. Can math and code provide insurance? We've seen audited contracts get hacked plenty of times. I've heard this logic a hundred and eighty times, what's the new trick next time? Relying on on-chain yields to fight devaluation, but first, stop crashing the coin price.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 01-22 19:30
It sounds nice, but isn't it just moving retail investors' assets into another risk pool? Haha Staking yields seem stable, but when the contract rugs, it happens even faster than a limit down. Don't deceive yourself. I heard this theory last year, and as a result, Luna just disappeared.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 01-22 19:30
Basically, it's about not messing with policies and regulations; smart people have already settled into yield farming. Staking yields look attractive, but what if the contract has a bug? Compared to tariff policies, I’m more worried about code vulnerabilities. Another set of flowery words, but in the end, it still can't escape the fate of diving when the market drops. Risk resistance system? Ha, I've heard that line a hundred times since 2021. Real insurance is about not going all in; staking at most 20%, the rest still depends on market conditions. It's ridiculous to think that stablecoin lending can save you; when liquidity is frozen, you're still trapped. The flaw in this logic is—you're assuming smart contracts are absolutely secure, which is the biggest risk of all. Instead of pondering these tricks, it's better to keep some fiat in the bank—that's true risk resistance. Sounds like a soft promotion for a yield protocol; with such high interest rates, there's no free lunch in this world.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21eevip
· 01-22 19:27
Another wave of arguments about cutting leeks, claiming that staking stablecoins can avoid crashes? Dream on. True "risk resistance" is avoiding leverage; everything else is just rhetoric. By the way, why isn't this round of tariff disputes over yet? It feels like there's a new plot every week. Staking yields are insignificant compared to the crypto price plunge, isn't it just a drop in the bucket? I just want to ask, did the code have a bug? Smart contracts can also rug pull. Is this article a soft promotion for a certain staking project? It feels a bit strange. Instead of researching multi-layered yields, it's better to figure out how to survive until the next bull market. The profit mechanism driven by contracts sounds impressive, but if the market crashes, everything is useless. People should keep a proper mindset: cut losses when needed, don't be brainwashed by these "insurance theories."
View OriginalReply0
ChainChefvip
· 01-22 19:10
ngl, the whole "yield farming as insurance" thing sounds good on paper but... have you actually stress-tested your recipe during real market crashes? asking for a friend lol
Reply0
AllInAlicevip
· 01-22 19:02
Another set of staking and earning schemes, really thinking that the code won't rug pull Staking yields look good, but liquidity freezing is the real trap The macro environment has collapsed, your smart contract won't escape either I got caught by this scheme last time and got wiped out, I don't want to try again The coin price has halved, those staking rewards are just a drop in the bucket
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)