2026-01-22 22:00:26

The popularity of RWA (Real-World Asset Tokenization) continues to rise, and what this track truly needs is not flashy promises, but infrastructure that can simultaneously address privacy protection and compliance auditing.

Dusk, a Layer 1 project launched in 2018, has become increasingly focused over the past two years—specifically designed for institutional-grade applications. Its approach is straightforward: through a modular architecture, it can protect transaction privacy while also integrating auditing functions. This directly addresses the core pain point for traditional financial institutions entering the on-chain world—they need both privacy and compliance.

Ordinary public chains often choose sides between the two, but institutional finance does not accept this trade-off. During this explosive phase of RWA, those who can meet both privacy and compliance needs will grasp the discourse power of infrastructure. From this perspective, the subsequent progress of $DUSK in the privacy finance field is worth watching.

DUSK2,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayoffMiner

· 01-25 20:14

Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? This is the true foundational infrastructure approach, much better than those who just hype up the market every day.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 01-25 18:15

Bro, the combination of privacy + compliance is indeed a necessity, but don't be fooled by the story; we need to look at real data. You're right, but I think Dusk still needs to wait a bit longer before truly taking off. Is this the future of RWA? It still feels a bit too optimistic. I agree with the logic of institutional finance, but can the execution really go so smoothly? Doubtful. Handling privacy and compliance simultaneously... sounds ideal, but what about in practice? Anyone in the know understands that this path won't be so simple. Under the guise of compliance, privacy is being sidelined—who dares to bet that this won't happen? Let's see how Dusk's move unfolds; a story doesn't equal strength.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 01-24 00:30

Privacy + compliance is indeed the bottleneck, I respect Dusk's approach. Other projects boast about privacy every day, but traditional finance isn't naive; they definitely have audits. That's the real demand. Two years ago, no one paid attention to Dusk. Now that RWA is gaining traction, they finally realize? Alright, institutional infrastructure still has room for imagination. To be honest, the profit opportunities are in projects that can solve real pain points, not in those that are just hype on PPTs.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-23 20:06

Haha, well said. Privacy and compliance should go hand in hand. Finally, someone is saying that privacy + compliance is not a choice between the two. Traditional finance is exactly this meticulous. From the perspective of DUSK, it really hits home; we need to watch how it develops behind the scenes. Institutional finance folks are all about this approach—privacy must be auditable and kept up. On the RWA side, it feels like there are too many people playing with concepts; only a few can truly solve the problems.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 01-22 22:28

Privacy + compliance is indeed a powerful combination that appeals to traditional finance, but on the other hand, how many projects can truly be implemented? These two requirements are inherently contradictory—privacy implies a black box, while compliance requires transparency... Can Dusk really handle this? I’d like to see actual application cases. The barrier for institutions entering the chain is not the technology itself but the policy and risk game... It’s a bit uncertain. Wait, can modular architecture really balance both sides at the same time? It sounds like a tall claim. In the wave of RWA, such infrastructure is indeed needed, but it feels like Dusk is still a bit too low-key. By the way, this kind of project was launched back in 2018? Why does it seem like so few people know about it...

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-22 22:26

Privacy and compliance are both handled, which is what institutions truly want, not those empty promises. To be honest, Dusk's approach really hits the mark, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on subsequent performance. Choosing sides on a public chain is fine, but when it comes to RWA, everyone has to compromise. It all depends on whose compromise plan is the most elegant. Since launching in 2018, we've finally found our rhythm, which hasn't been easy. A bunch of projects boast, but Dusk is at least working diligently. For this kind of infrastructure-level stuff, the competition has just begun.

View OriginalReply0

StableGenius

· 01-22 22:24

nah hold up, this privacy-audit combo is literally just basic table stakes for institutions, not some revolutionary moat. dusk talking about it like they invented water.

Reply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-22 22:17

Privacy + compliance double approach? Sounds good, but I feel like this is another paradise for tech enthusiasts and a hell for practical users...

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 01-22 22:14

Privacy + compliance at the same time indeed hits the pain point for institutions, but whether this can truly be implemented depends on execution capability. Having the architecture alone is not enough; the key is who will be the first to bottom out in this track.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-22 22:07

Privacy + compliance handled simultaneously—that's the true infrastructure logic. The usual tricks of public chains that try to be all things to all people just don't work. --- For RWA to truly take off, it needs projects that can both prove their innocence and keep others from seeing through. Compared to those just hyping up, Dusk's pragmatic approach is really hitting the mark. --- Honestly, institutional-level demands are quite simple—privacy is a must, and regulators need to be assured. Those who truly achieve this will take the biggest share. --- Since 2018, becoming more clearly defined is actually a good sign. Projects that rely on superficial tricks should have been eliminated long ago; it all depends on whether they can truly be implemented later. --- Privacy and compliance have never been opposites; it's just that most public chains are too lazy to do both at the same time. This is the real moat. --- No matter how many lofty promises are made, it's meaningless. The real benchmark is whether traditional financial giants can actually start using it.

View OriginalReply0