#国家战略比特币储备 After observing this wave of events in Venezuela, I have to say: this is the most profound lesson I’ve learned in the crypto space over the years — **rumors themselves are the biggest risk**.
A $60 billion BTC shadow reserve? Sounds crazy, but a close look at the data support collapses it. Whale Alert’s founder straightforwardly states — if they truly hold 600,000 BTC, it’s almost impossible to evade on-chain analysis by tracking agencies. And what’s the result? Arkham, Chainalysis, Elliptic all failed to find large wallets linked to the government. What does this tell us? **Stories without on-chain evidence, no matter how sensational, are just stories**.
So why did this wave of market movement happen? The bullish expectations in the options market, the resonance of risk assets rebounding in the US stock market — all are real. But the real trap is this: **the market is treating "rumors" as "pricing factors"**. Look at how many are speculating about "the US building strategic reserves" or "Venezuela possibly releasing BTC"… and what’s the result? Who remembers this a month later?
My warning is: don’t FOMO into betting on this "if". How many times in history have we seen a rumor trigger a sharp rise, only to be slapped down by reality? Germany’s sale of 50,000 BTC in 2024 caused short-term panic, and the potential selling pressure of 600,000 BTC could really cause a dump — but that requires the private keys to actually be controlled.
**Key judgment**: If this asset truly exists but the private keys are out of control, it would be a disaster. If it gets frozen by the US, it could actually be good for the price (reducing circulating supply). If it doesn’t exist at all, then it’s just a white elephant.
Until concrete evidence appears, maintain a cautious attitude towards any "big news." That’s the secret to longevity — **not being swayed by rumors, but following on-chain data and fundamentals**.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#国家战略比特币储备 After observing this wave of events in Venezuela, I have to say: this is the most profound lesson I’ve learned in the crypto space over the years — **rumors themselves are the biggest risk**.
A $60 billion BTC shadow reserve? Sounds crazy, but a close look at the data support collapses it. Whale Alert’s founder straightforwardly states — if they truly hold 600,000 BTC, it’s almost impossible to evade on-chain analysis by tracking agencies. And what’s the result? Arkham, Chainalysis, Elliptic all failed to find large wallets linked to the government. What does this tell us? **Stories without on-chain evidence, no matter how sensational, are just stories**.
So why did this wave of market movement happen? The bullish expectations in the options market, the resonance of risk assets rebounding in the US stock market — all are real. But the real trap is this: **the market is treating "rumors" as "pricing factors"**. Look at how many are speculating about "the US building strategic reserves" or "Venezuela possibly releasing BTC"… and what’s the result? Who remembers this a month later?
My warning is: don’t FOMO into betting on this "if". How many times in history have we seen a rumor trigger a sharp rise, only to be slapped down by reality? Germany’s sale of 50,000 BTC in 2024 caused short-term panic, and the potential selling pressure of 600,000 BTC could really cause a dump — but that requires the private keys to actually be controlled.
**Key judgment**: If this asset truly exists but the private keys are out of control, it would be a disaster. If it gets frozen by the US, it could actually be good for the price (reducing circulating supply). If it doesn’t exist at all, then it’s just a white elephant.
Until concrete evidence appears, maintain a cautious attitude towards any "big news." That’s the secret to longevity — **not being swayed by rumors, but following on-chain data and fundamentals**.