2025 unfolded as a year of stark contradictions in the blockchain ecosystem. While fundamental network metrics—transaction volumes, protocol revenues, and ecosystem capitals—showed robust growth, token prices largely stagnated or declined. This phenomenon reflected a deeper structural shift: value creation and value capture have become increasingly decoupled. At the heart of this transformation lies an often-overlooked narrative—the emergence of ordinals and inscription-based protocols as catalysts for sustained transaction demand and miner economics on Bitcoin, ultimately reshaping how blockchains accrue and distribute value.
The divergence proved especially pronounced for Layer-1 assets. Nearly every major altcoin finished 2025 underwater, yet eight of ten examined ecosystems recorded Total Value Locked (TVL) growth in native token terms, and seven experienced increased daily activity. The disconnect suggests that markets now prioritize different value capture mechanisms than they did in previous cycles—a shift that has profound implications for understanding which blockchains will thrive in 2026.
The Structural Shift: Application Layers Capture, Base Layers Decline
When examining the macro picture across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and smaller ecosystems, one pattern became unavoidable: application-layer revenues surged while base-layer fees collapsed. Across eight tracked ecosystems, chain fees declined universally, falling by an average of 58% year-over-year. Yet application revenues grew in six of eight networks, with some ecosystems recording triple-digit gains.
This inversion of value capture represents a fundamental maturation of blockchain markets. Layer-1 tokens now command roughly 90% of total crypto market capitalization but capture only 12% of network fees—down from 60% just two years prior. Capital is no longer flowing automatically to underlying blockchain tokens. Instead, investors have grown increasingly selective, funneling resources into protocols and applications demonstrating genuine product-market fit.
The implications are profound. As base-layer security and throughput become commoditized—with nearly every major chain capable of processing thousands of transactions per second at negligible cost—competition has intensified at the application tier. DEXs, lending protocols, stablecoins, and emerging verticals like ordinals now serve as the primary value drivers and return generators.
Bitcoin’s Evolution: From Scarcity to Economic Engine
Bitcoin entered 2025 on a wave of optimism tied to anticipated regulatory shifts. The asset surged to a record $126.08K by mid-year, driven by unprecedented institutional adoption through spot ETFs and newly formed digital asset treasuries (DATs). By year-end, however, macroeconomic headwinds—accelerating tariffs, shifting rate expectations, and broad risk-off sentiment—triggered a sharp retracement. Bitcoin currently trades at $78.64K, representing a -23.27% year-to-date decline, though its market dominance strengthened from 58.1% to 56.63%.
The most significant structural evolution involves Bitcoin’s transition from a traditional four-year halving cycle toward a regime increasingly driven by institutional capital flows and emerging economic layers. Two hundred publicly listed companies now hold Bitcoin, collectively accounting for 12.8% of circulating supply—a 35% increase year-over-year. This institutional anchoring, combined with the expansion of BTCFi protocols and Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions, has created multiple pathways for on-chain economic activity and sustainable miner revenues.
The ordinals and inscriptions narrative, while volatile, proved essential to Bitcoin’s economic sustainability. At the April 2024 peak, ordinals-driven transaction fees comprised 50% of total miner revenues—far exceeding the current 1% contribution. This divergence highlights a critical vulnerability: as block subsidy halving accelerates (now at 3.125 BTC per block), miners face an existential challenge. Bitcoin’s hashrate has reached record 1.1 ZH/s, yet profitability pressures have driven approximately 15 publicly listed mining firms to pivot toward AI-focused data-center infrastructure over the past two years.
The resurgence of ordinals activity would be structurally constructive for miner economics. Enhanced protocols like Bitcoin Core 30, which expanded OP_RETURN limits from 80 bytes to 100,000 bytes, remove technical constraints that previously forced users toward alternative approaches. This upgrade democratizes data embedding on Bitcoin and creates pathways for richer applications—from decentralized identity to complex smart contracts—while generating meaningful transaction fee revenue. We expect ordinals-related activity to remain a focal point in 2026, particularly as Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions mature and on-chain economic activity accelerates.
Ethereum: Rollup-Centric Architecture Validates Through Action
Ethereum’s 2025 performance mirrored the broader divergence narrative. ETH declined 27.58% year-to-date to $2.39K, underperforming both BTC and other major ecosystems. Yet underlying metrics told a starkly different story: TVL expanded from 25M to 31M ETH, monthly DEX volumes climbed from $67B to $86B, and stablecoin market capitalization surged 50%, from $111B to $166B.
More critically, Layer-1 revenue collapsed. Average monthly L1 fees fell from $100M to below $15M—a 85% decline. Yet this apparent catastrophe actually validated Ethereum’s intentional roadmap. With stablecoin volumes and DeFi activity reaching all-time highs despite plummeting base-layer fees, the network demonstrated that its rollup-centric strategy is functioning precisely as designed: value creation concentrates at the application layer while base-layer costs remain negligible.
Digital Asset Treasury entities holding ETH emerged as unexpected institutional catalysts. Starting in mid-July, specialized treasury vehicles began accumulating ETH at scale, collectively securing approximately 3.5% of total circulating supply. This institutional participation drove ETH’s Q3 outperformance, though the narrative faded as quarterly growth rates decelerated from 200% (Q3) to -6% (Q4 ongoing).
The stablecoin yield narrative proved equally transformative. Ethereum now dominates yield generation across DeFi, supported by three distinct categories: Real-World yield sources (Sky/formerly MakerDAO), Crypto-native synthetic yield (Ethena), and traditional lending yield (Aave). Ethena’s TVL declined sharply in late 2025—from $14.8B to $7.6B—driven by basis trade compression and reduced crypto market volatility. Yet this compression merely reflects temporary conditions. As crypto sentiment transitions toward bullish cycles, funding rates should spike, reviving synthetic stablecoin yields and restoring Ethena’s prominence.
Solana: High-Throughput Networks Capture Payments and Speculation
Solana’s 2025 narrative combined exceptional on-chain throughput with volatile price dynamics. SOL crashed 54.81% year-to-date to $105.08, reflecting both macro headwinds and ecosystem-specific liquidity imbalances. Yet measured in SOL terms, TVL actually expanded 56.5% to approximately 138M SOL, and stablecoin market capitalization surged 186% to $15B—underscoring a fundamental distinction between price weakness and utility growth.
Solana has crystallized its position as the network of choice for payments and real-time settlement. USDC monthly senders on Solana reached 3M, representing one-third of all global active USDC users. October marked a milestone with $626B in adjusted transaction volume across Solana—a 4.6x month-over-month increase and the highest level ever recorded. Western Union announced plans to launch its U.S. Dollar Payment Token (USDPT) on Solana, while Cash App committed to enabling USDC payments on the network in early 2026, all powered by Solana’s infrastructure.
The emergence of proprietary AMMs (PropAMMs) introduced a structural innovation, embedding optimized trading strategies directly into runtime and removing latency inherent in off-chain execution. PropAMMs now comprise approximately 50% of total DEX volume, with HumidFi commanding dominance. This architecture evolution suggests that as memecoins transition from 90% to a more sustainable share of trading volume, efficient market microstructure will become an increasingly differentiating factor.
Solana’s institutional adoption accelerated through six spot ETF launches since November, collectively holding $638M in AUM, while 16 publicly listed companies disclosed Solana holdings. Forward Industries emerged as the largest Solana-focused DAT, accumulating nearly 7M SOL—equivalent to 1.12% of total circulating supply.
Cardano and Layer-2 Scalability: Infrastructure Maturity Signals
Cardano’s 2025 proved challenging on market fronts—ADA declined 68.78% year-to-date to $0.29—yet the ecosystem’s technical trajectory advanced meaningfully. The Plomin Hard Fork on January 29 finalized the CIP-1694 governance model, enabling fully decentralized governance and the Delegated Representative (DRep) system. Monthly active developers increased marginally from 654 to 680, though Cardano maintained competitive standing against Optimism and BNB Smart Chain in full-time developer count.
Hydra, Cardano’s Layer-2 scaling solution, reached production-readiness status and demonstrated real deployment through Midnight’s token generation event. This milestone validates the pathway toward commercial-grade scalability—addressing longstanding criticisms regarding speed and throughput. Hydra v1’s deployment signals a structural shift in Cardano’s developer ecosystem, with builders increasingly leveraging scaling infrastructure to unlock high-frequency applications from decentralized gaming to micro-payments.
Cardano’s BTCFi expansion, powered by its Extended UTXO (eUTXO) architecture, introduced non-custodial bridges through BitVM partnerships and bridgeless protocols like BitcoinOS. These cryptographic solutions eliminate centralized wrapper risks while creating seamless connections to Bitcoin’s liquidity—potentially catalyzing material DeFi TVL expansion in 2026.
XRP: From Payments to Comprehensive Financial Infrastructure
XRP delivered one of 2025’s most unexpected performances, appreciating 3.68% year-to-date to $1.64 despite broader altcoin weakness. More significantly, the asset set an all-time high of $3.65 in July, reinforcing Ripple’s expanding institutional narrative.
Ripple’s strategic transformation proved profound. The company expanded from cross-border payments into a comprehensive institutional stack: acquiring Metaco (custody), Rail (stablecoins and payments), GTreasury (treasury management), and Hidden Road (prime brokerage, rebranded as Ripple Prime). Ripple Prime now processes $3T annually, moves $10B daily, and facilitates 50M transactions—positioning Ripple among the world’s largest digital asset infrastructure providers.
RLUSD, Ripple’s regulated stablecoin, surpassed $1B in circulating supply within its first year, with year-to-date trading volume reaching $36.2B across centralized exchanges. The launch of the XRPL EVM sidechain in June established RLUSD’s ability to move frictionlessly between Ethereum and XRPL, creating a strategic gateway for Ethereum-based capital to access XRPL’s native DeFi opportunities.
XRPFi emerged as a transformational narrative, with Doppler Finance launching as the first XRPFi protocol in February, enabling native yield opportunities through vault strategies and lending markets. Extensions technology, enabling developers to attach modular code to ledger primitives, introduced sophisticated programmability without sacrificing security or efficiency. Smart Escrows—the first Extension—is slated for Q1 2026 release, followed by a full smart contract devnet marking XRPL’s most significant developer capability expansion in its history.
Bitcoin Layer-2s and Ordinals: A Symbiotic Relationship
Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions and ordinals represent complementary developments shaping Bitcoin’s economic layer. Stacks pioneered this relationship through its Proof-of-Transfer (PoX) consensus mechanism, which requires direct Bitcoin transactions to bid for block production rights, creating persistent L1 demand. Babylon, rapidly expanding as a modular BTC staking primitive, has attracted nearly $5B in TVL by enabling PoS chains to post checkpoint commitments and staking attestations directly to Bitcoin.
Emerging Bitcoin rollups like Citrea and Bitlayer, enabled by BitVM innovations, execute transactions off-chain while posting compressed state roots and fraud proofs to Bitcoin for settlement—mirroring Ethereum’s rollup architecture while preserving Bitcoin’s security model. Collectively, BTC Layer-2s and BTCFi TVL reached nearly $8B in 2025.
Ordinals and inscriptions, while experiencing subdued activity in 2025, represent a critical counterbalance to this scaling narrative. Unlike Layer-2 solutions that intentionally reduce L1 settlement demand, ordinals and OP_RETURN expansions generate persistent, unavoidable transaction fees on Bitcoin’s base layer. The Bitcoin community’s debate around OP_RETURN expansion—highlighted by Bitcoin Core 30’s increased limits and the subsequent migration of 5,000+ node operators toward Bitcoin Knots—underscores the tension between scalability and base-layer security incentives.
A resurgence in ordinals-driven transaction volumes would prove constructive for long-term miner economics. At the April 2024 peak, ordinals protocols generated sufficient fee revenue to support miner profitability despite sub-optimal hardware utilization. As block subsidies continue halving, sustaining meaningful transaction fee layers becomes essential. Ordinals, by embedding rich data and enabling complex protocols directly on-chain, create economic incentives for on-chain activity that don’t require capital efficiency—unlike Layer-2 solutions that optimize for cost reduction.
Privacy and Cross-Chain Abstraction: Emerging Institutional Necessities
Privacy protocols experienced remarkable growth despite broader market weakness. Zcash (ZEC) appreciated 592.72% year-to-date to $298.79, with shielded supply nearly tripling to 4.8M ZEC—approximately 30% of circulating supply. Z→Z transactions (fully shielded) reached 20% of network activity, up from single digits three years prior. Zashi wallet’s consumer-grade UX—auto-shielding and address rotation—catalyzed this adoption flywheel.
Zashi’s CrossPay mechanism positions Zcash as a cross-chain privacy router, enabling users to spend ZEC privately while recipients settle in USDC, ETH, BTC, or other assets. Weekly volumes via NEAR Intents averaged over $100M in November 2025 alone, representing approximately 12% of all NEAR Intent volumes. This integration demonstrates how privacy and cross-chain abstraction have converged as institutional necessities.
NEAR’s chain-abstraction framework has itself emerged as foundational infrastructure. With 24 blockchains integrated into NEAR Intents and over $6.5B in cumulative transfers facilitated, the protocol has demonstrated that chain abstraction isn’t theoretical—it’s production-ready and generating meaningful economic activity. These capabilities prove essential as institutional participation broadens and multi-chain treasury management becomes standard practice.
BNB Smart Chain and Solana: Divergent Paths to Network Dominance
BNB Smart Chain’s 2025 proved exceptional, with BNB appreciating 13.79% year-to-date to $770.90—significantly outperforming BTC and ETH. This performance reflected fundamental re-engineering through two major hard forks: Lorentz (April) and Maxwell (June), which reduced block times to 0.75 seconds and finality to 1.875 seconds. These improvements enabled on-chain order books to compete directly with centralized exchanges on execution speed.
Aster DEX emerged as BSC’s defining narrative, commanding approximately $42B in weekly volumes and accounting for 20% of global perpetuals volume—rivaling competitors like Hyperliquid and Lighter. Pancakeswap’s volumes surged from $5B to $11B weekly, a 2x increase driven by improved tokenomics and its dominant position capturing long-tail trading activity.
Solana, by contrast, faced more turbulent conditions despite maintaining its position as the network of choice for high-throughput retail activity. Yet its resilience in developer commitment and institutional adoption—evidenced by ETF approvals and DAT formations—suggests that price weakness reflects temporary market conditions rather than fundamental erosion of utility.
Looking Forward: Ordinals, Sustainability, and the New Market Regime
The 2025 divergence between structural progress and price performance establishes a new paradigm for evaluating blockchain value creation. Token prices no longer automatically track network fundamentals. Instead, markets increasingly focus on application-layer profitability, sustainable economic models, and genuine product-market fit.
Within this new regime, ordinals assume particular importance as a mechanism for sustaining Bitcoin’s long-term security budget. Unlike Layer-2 solutions or rollups—which intentionally reduce base-layer settlement demand—ordinals generate recurring, economically meaningful transaction fees that don’t depend on capital efficiency optimization.
As 2026 unfolds, expect continued institutional participation in ETFs and DATs, but anticipate that price appreciation will correlate increasingly with application-layer revenue generation rather than base-layer activity metrics. Networks hosting protocols that achieve sustainable, non-incentive-dependent revenues—whether through ordinals on Bitcoin, sophisticated lending on Ethereum, or payment infrastructure on Solana—will likely outperform networks that remain purely speculative or rely on token incentives to drive activity.
The convergence of chain abstraction, privacy infrastructure, and bitcoin-native scaling solutions suggests that the next wave of blockchains success will depend not on singular narratives but on ecosystems’ ability to coordinate across multiple economic layers—from Layer-1 security to application-specific execution to cross-chain interoperability. Ordinals, by anchoring Bitcoin to meaningful on-chain economic demand, serve as one critical piece of this broader infrastructure evolution.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Blockchain Divergence: How On-Chain Activity, Ordinals, and Market Structure Reshaped 2025
2025 unfolded as a year of stark contradictions in the blockchain ecosystem. While fundamental network metrics—transaction volumes, protocol revenues, and ecosystem capitals—showed robust growth, token prices largely stagnated or declined. This phenomenon reflected a deeper structural shift: value creation and value capture have become increasingly decoupled. At the heart of this transformation lies an often-overlooked narrative—the emergence of ordinals and inscription-based protocols as catalysts for sustained transaction demand and miner economics on Bitcoin, ultimately reshaping how blockchains accrue and distribute value.
The divergence proved especially pronounced for Layer-1 assets. Nearly every major altcoin finished 2025 underwater, yet eight of ten examined ecosystems recorded Total Value Locked (TVL) growth in native token terms, and seven experienced increased daily activity. The disconnect suggests that markets now prioritize different value capture mechanisms than they did in previous cycles—a shift that has profound implications for understanding which blockchains will thrive in 2026.
The Structural Shift: Application Layers Capture, Base Layers Decline
When examining the macro picture across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and smaller ecosystems, one pattern became unavoidable: application-layer revenues surged while base-layer fees collapsed. Across eight tracked ecosystems, chain fees declined universally, falling by an average of 58% year-over-year. Yet application revenues grew in six of eight networks, with some ecosystems recording triple-digit gains.
This inversion of value capture represents a fundamental maturation of blockchain markets. Layer-1 tokens now command roughly 90% of total crypto market capitalization but capture only 12% of network fees—down from 60% just two years prior. Capital is no longer flowing automatically to underlying blockchain tokens. Instead, investors have grown increasingly selective, funneling resources into protocols and applications demonstrating genuine product-market fit.
The implications are profound. As base-layer security and throughput become commoditized—with nearly every major chain capable of processing thousands of transactions per second at negligible cost—competition has intensified at the application tier. DEXs, lending protocols, stablecoins, and emerging verticals like ordinals now serve as the primary value drivers and return generators.
Bitcoin’s Evolution: From Scarcity to Economic Engine
Bitcoin entered 2025 on a wave of optimism tied to anticipated regulatory shifts. The asset surged to a record $126.08K by mid-year, driven by unprecedented institutional adoption through spot ETFs and newly formed digital asset treasuries (DATs). By year-end, however, macroeconomic headwinds—accelerating tariffs, shifting rate expectations, and broad risk-off sentiment—triggered a sharp retracement. Bitcoin currently trades at $78.64K, representing a -23.27% year-to-date decline, though its market dominance strengthened from 58.1% to 56.63%.
The most significant structural evolution involves Bitcoin’s transition from a traditional four-year halving cycle toward a regime increasingly driven by institutional capital flows and emerging economic layers. Two hundred publicly listed companies now hold Bitcoin, collectively accounting for 12.8% of circulating supply—a 35% increase year-over-year. This institutional anchoring, combined with the expansion of BTCFi protocols and Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions, has created multiple pathways for on-chain economic activity and sustainable miner revenues.
The ordinals and inscriptions narrative, while volatile, proved essential to Bitcoin’s economic sustainability. At the April 2024 peak, ordinals-driven transaction fees comprised 50% of total miner revenues—far exceeding the current 1% contribution. This divergence highlights a critical vulnerability: as block subsidy halving accelerates (now at 3.125 BTC per block), miners face an existential challenge. Bitcoin’s hashrate has reached record 1.1 ZH/s, yet profitability pressures have driven approximately 15 publicly listed mining firms to pivot toward AI-focused data-center infrastructure over the past two years.
The resurgence of ordinals activity would be structurally constructive for miner economics. Enhanced protocols like Bitcoin Core 30, which expanded OP_RETURN limits from 80 bytes to 100,000 bytes, remove technical constraints that previously forced users toward alternative approaches. This upgrade democratizes data embedding on Bitcoin and creates pathways for richer applications—from decentralized identity to complex smart contracts—while generating meaningful transaction fee revenue. We expect ordinals-related activity to remain a focal point in 2026, particularly as Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions mature and on-chain economic activity accelerates.
Ethereum: Rollup-Centric Architecture Validates Through Action
Ethereum’s 2025 performance mirrored the broader divergence narrative. ETH declined 27.58% year-to-date to $2.39K, underperforming both BTC and other major ecosystems. Yet underlying metrics told a starkly different story: TVL expanded from 25M to 31M ETH, monthly DEX volumes climbed from $67B to $86B, and stablecoin market capitalization surged 50%, from $111B to $166B.
More critically, Layer-1 revenue collapsed. Average monthly L1 fees fell from $100M to below $15M—a 85% decline. Yet this apparent catastrophe actually validated Ethereum’s intentional roadmap. With stablecoin volumes and DeFi activity reaching all-time highs despite plummeting base-layer fees, the network demonstrated that its rollup-centric strategy is functioning precisely as designed: value creation concentrates at the application layer while base-layer costs remain negligible.
Digital Asset Treasury entities holding ETH emerged as unexpected institutional catalysts. Starting in mid-July, specialized treasury vehicles began accumulating ETH at scale, collectively securing approximately 3.5% of total circulating supply. This institutional participation drove ETH’s Q3 outperformance, though the narrative faded as quarterly growth rates decelerated from 200% (Q3) to -6% (Q4 ongoing).
The stablecoin yield narrative proved equally transformative. Ethereum now dominates yield generation across DeFi, supported by three distinct categories: Real-World yield sources (Sky/formerly MakerDAO), Crypto-native synthetic yield (Ethena), and traditional lending yield (Aave). Ethena’s TVL declined sharply in late 2025—from $14.8B to $7.6B—driven by basis trade compression and reduced crypto market volatility. Yet this compression merely reflects temporary conditions. As crypto sentiment transitions toward bullish cycles, funding rates should spike, reviving synthetic stablecoin yields and restoring Ethena’s prominence.
Solana: High-Throughput Networks Capture Payments and Speculation
Solana’s 2025 narrative combined exceptional on-chain throughput with volatile price dynamics. SOL crashed 54.81% year-to-date to $105.08, reflecting both macro headwinds and ecosystem-specific liquidity imbalances. Yet measured in SOL terms, TVL actually expanded 56.5% to approximately 138M SOL, and stablecoin market capitalization surged 186% to $15B—underscoring a fundamental distinction between price weakness and utility growth.
Solana has crystallized its position as the network of choice for payments and real-time settlement. USDC monthly senders on Solana reached 3M, representing one-third of all global active USDC users. October marked a milestone with $626B in adjusted transaction volume across Solana—a 4.6x month-over-month increase and the highest level ever recorded. Western Union announced plans to launch its U.S. Dollar Payment Token (USDPT) on Solana, while Cash App committed to enabling USDC payments on the network in early 2026, all powered by Solana’s infrastructure.
The emergence of proprietary AMMs (PropAMMs) introduced a structural innovation, embedding optimized trading strategies directly into runtime and removing latency inherent in off-chain execution. PropAMMs now comprise approximately 50% of total DEX volume, with HumidFi commanding dominance. This architecture evolution suggests that as memecoins transition from 90% to a more sustainable share of trading volume, efficient market microstructure will become an increasingly differentiating factor.
Solana’s institutional adoption accelerated through six spot ETF launches since November, collectively holding $638M in AUM, while 16 publicly listed companies disclosed Solana holdings. Forward Industries emerged as the largest Solana-focused DAT, accumulating nearly 7M SOL—equivalent to 1.12% of total circulating supply.
Cardano and Layer-2 Scalability: Infrastructure Maturity Signals
Cardano’s 2025 proved challenging on market fronts—ADA declined 68.78% year-to-date to $0.29—yet the ecosystem’s technical trajectory advanced meaningfully. The Plomin Hard Fork on January 29 finalized the CIP-1694 governance model, enabling fully decentralized governance and the Delegated Representative (DRep) system. Monthly active developers increased marginally from 654 to 680, though Cardano maintained competitive standing against Optimism and BNB Smart Chain in full-time developer count.
Hydra, Cardano’s Layer-2 scaling solution, reached production-readiness status and demonstrated real deployment through Midnight’s token generation event. This milestone validates the pathway toward commercial-grade scalability—addressing longstanding criticisms regarding speed and throughput. Hydra v1’s deployment signals a structural shift in Cardano’s developer ecosystem, with builders increasingly leveraging scaling infrastructure to unlock high-frequency applications from decentralized gaming to micro-payments.
Cardano’s BTCFi expansion, powered by its Extended UTXO (eUTXO) architecture, introduced non-custodial bridges through BitVM partnerships and bridgeless protocols like BitcoinOS. These cryptographic solutions eliminate centralized wrapper risks while creating seamless connections to Bitcoin’s liquidity—potentially catalyzing material DeFi TVL expansion in 2026.
XRP: From Payments to Comprehensive Financial Infrastructure
XRP delivered one of 2025’s most unexpected performances, appreciating 3.68% year-to-date to $1.64 despite broader altcoin weakness. More significantly, the asset set an all-time high of $3.65 in July, reinforcing Ripple’s expanding institutional narrative.
Ripple’s strategic transformation proved profound. The company expanded from cross-border payments into a comprehensive institutional stack: acquiring Metaco (custody), Rail (stablecoins and payments), GTreasury (treasury management), and Hidden Road (prime brokerage, rebranded as Ripple Prime). Ripple Prime now processes $3T annually, moves $10B daily, and facilitates 50M transactions—positioning Ripple among the world’s largest digital asset infrastructure providers.
RLUSD, Ripple’s regulated stablecoin, surpassed $1B in circulating supply within its first year, with year-to-date trading volume reaching $36.2B across centralized exchanges. The launch of the XRPL EVM sidechain in June established RLUSD’s ability to move frictionlessly between Ethereum and XRPL, creating a strategic gateway for Ethereum-based capital to access XRPL’s native DeFi opportunities.
XRPFi emerged as a transformational narrative, with Doppler Finance launching as the first XRPFi protocol in February, enabling native yield opportunities through vault strategies and lending markets. Extensions technology, enabling developers to attach modular code to ledger primitives, introduced sophisticated programmability without sacrificing security or efficiency. Smart Escrows—the first Extension—is slated for Q1 2026 release, followed by a full smart contract devnet marking XRPL’s most significant developer capability expansion in its history.
Bitcoin Layer-2s and Ordinals: A Symbiotic Relationship
Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions and ordinals represent complementary developments shaping Bitcoin’s economic layer. Stacks pioneered this relationship through its Proof-of-Transfer (PoX) consensus mechanism, which requires direct Bitcoin transactions to bid for block production rights, creating persistent L1 demand. Babylon, rapidly expanding as a modular BTC staking primitive, has attracted nearly $5B in TVL by enabling PoS chains to post checkpoint commitments and staking attestations directly to Bitcoin.
Emerging Bitcoin rollups like Citrea and Bitlayer, enabled by BitVM innovations, execute transactions off-chain while posting compressed state roots and fraud proofs to Bitcoin for settlement—mirroring Ethereum’s rollup architecture while preserving Bitcoin’s security model. Collectively, BTC Layer-2s and BTCFi TVL reached nearly $8B in 2025.
Ordinals and inscriptions, while experiencing subdued activity in 2025, represent a critical counterbalance to this scaling narrative. Unlike Layer-2 solutions that intentionally reduce L1 settlement demand, ordinals and OP_RETURN expansions generate persistent, unavoidable transaction fees on Bitcoin’s base layer. The Bitcoin community’s debate around OP_RETURN expansion—highlighted by Bitcoin Core 30’s increased limits and the subsequent migration of 5,000+ node operators toward Bitcoin Knots—underscores the tension between scalability and base-layer security incentives.
A resurgence in ordinals-driven transaction volumes would prove constructive for long-term miner economics. At the April 2024 peak, ordinals protocols generated sufficient fee revenue to support miner profitability despite sub-optimal hardware utilization. As block subsidies continue halving, sustaining meaningful transaction fee layers becomes essential. Ordinals, by embedding rich data and enabling complex protocols directly on-chain, create economic incentives for on-chain activity that don’t require capital efficiency—unlike Layer-2 solutions that optimize for cost reduction.
Privacy and Cross-Chain Abstraction: Emerging Institutional Necessities
Privacy protocols experienced remarkable growth despite broader market weakness. Zcash (ZEC) appreciated 592.72% year-to-date to $298.79, with shielded supply nearly tripling to 4.8M ZEC—approximately 30% of circulating supply. Z→Z transactions (fully shielded) reached 20% of network activity, up from single digits three years prior. Zashi wallet’s consumer-grade UX—auto-shielding and address rotation—catalyzed this adoption flywheel.
Zashi’s CrossPay mechanism positions Zcash as a cross-chain privacy router, enabling users to spend ZEC privately while recipients settle in USDC, ETH, BTC, or other assets. Weekly volumes via NEAR Intents averaged over $100M in November 2025 alone, representing approximately 12% of all NEAR Intent volumes. This integration demonstrates how privacy and cross-chain abstraction have converged as institutional necessities.
NEAR’s chain-abstraction framework has itself emerged as foundational infrastructure. With 24 blockchains integrated into NEAR Intents and over $6.5B in cumulative transfers facilitated, the protocol has demonstrated that chain abstraction isn’t theoretical—it’s production-ready and generating meaningful economic activity. These capabilities prove essential as institutional participation broadens and multi-chain treasury management becomes standard practice.
BNB Smart Chain and Solana: Divergent Paths to Network Dominance
BNB Smart Chain’s 2025 proved exceptional, with BNB appreciating 13.79% year-to-date to $770.90—significantly outperforming BTC and ETH. This performance reflected fundamental re-engineering through two major hard forks: Lorentz (April) and Maxwell (June), which reduced block times to 0.75 seconds and finality to 1.875 seconds. These improvements enabled on-chain order books to compete directly with centralized exchanges on execution speed.
Aster DEX emerged as BSC’s defining narrative, commanding approximately $42B in weekly volumes and accounting for 20% of global perpetuals volume—rivaling competitors like Hyperliquid and Lighter. Pancakeswap’s volumes surged from $5B to $11B weekly, a 2x increase driven by improved tokenomics and its dominant position capturing long-tail trading activity.
Solana, by contrast, faced more turbulent conditions despite maintaining its position as the network of choice for high-throughput retail activity. Yet its resilience in developer commitment and institutional adoption—evidenced by ETF approvals and DAT formations—suggests that price weakness reflects temporary market conditions rather than fundamental erosion of utility.
Looking Forward: Ordinals, Sustainability, and the New Market Regime
The 2025 divergence between structural progress and price performance establishes a new paradigm for evaluating blockchain value creation. Token prices no longer automatically track network fundamentals. Instead, markets increasingly focus on application-layer profitability, sustainable economic models, and genuine product-market fit.
Within this new regime, ordinals assume particular importance as a mechanism for sustaining Bitcoin’s long-term security budget. Unlike Layer-2 solutions or rollups—which intentionally reduce base-layer settlement demand—ordinals generate recurring, economically meaningful transaction fees that don’t depend on capital efficiency optimization.
As 2026 unfolds, expect continued institutional participation in ETFs and DATs, but anticipate that price appreciation will correlate increasingly with application-layer revenue generation rather than base-layer activity metrics. Networks hosting protocols that achieve sustainable, non-incentive-dependent revenues—whether through ordinals on Bitcoin, sophisticated lending on Ethereum, or payment infrastructure on Solana—will likely outperform networks that remain purely speculative or rely on token incentives to drive activity.
The convergence of chain abstraction, privacy infrastructure, and bitcoin-native scaling solutions suggests that the next wave of blockchains success will depend not on singular narratives but on ecosystems’ ability to coordinate across multiple economic layers—from Layer-1 security to application-specific execution to cross-chain interoperability. Ordinals, by anchoring Bitcoin to meaningful on-chain economic demand, serve as one critical piece of this broader infrastructure evolution.