(9) 50% of Anthropic agent calls are in software engineering;
(10) Citrini research report triggers market panic selling — we live in a meme economy.
Full text below:
It’s that time again: time for another “10 Charts” series.
I try to do this quarterly, but we’re overdue: the last one was in October. This is our 11th edition (!), and you know the rules: I’m a visual learner, charts help me process information. Charts are also an effective way to show how the world is changing.
We’ll cover 10 charts on a wide range of topics:
Newspaper stocks vs. earnings
Still the first game
AI application usage
Healthcare drives employment
Secondary market reshaping VC + employee returns
Gen Z: the last generation in the alphabet
Peptides and Reta
Gaming landscape
Calls for more Agent usage
Citrini sell-off
Without further ado…
Newspaper stocks vs. earnings
This chart shows the comparison between newspaper stocks and earnings. You can see that stocks crashed about five years before earnings declined, indicating the market saw the warning signs before the profit and loss statements reflected trouble.
Source: Twitter; thanks to Emily Man for sending
Of course, there’s some time lag; the decline in forward earnings coincided with the Great Recession. But directionally, it seems accurate—the market anticipated the internet disrupting newspapers. We’re seeing this again now, with SaaS stocks crashing last month before AI disruption.
As we wrote last week, SaaSpocalypse (the SaaS apocalypse) takes time to unfold. I attended a panel discussion this week where one member said “Campbell Soup won’t vibe-code their own CRM,” a clever way to say software profits are compressing, and the “new normal” is 70% gross margin instead of 90%.
On the long timeline for AI to unfold…
Still the first game
This is a cool visualization of where we are in the AI adoption cycle. Each dot represents 3.2 million people. There are 2,500 dots, totaling 810 million people.
Gray = 6.8 billion who have never used AI
Green = 1.3 billion free users
Yellow = 15-35 million paid users
Red = 2-5 million coders
Source: Noah Epstein on Twitter
Approximately 84% of the world has never used AI, and only 0.3% (!) pay for AI products. This is one of the best visualizations I’ve seen showing how early we still are.
AI application usage time
In our previous “10 Charts” edition, we looked at ChatGPT’s “smile curve”:
From that article:
This chart commits what I call the “Y-axis crime,” meaning the Y-axis is misleadingly not starting at zero. But in this case, the Y-axis crime actually hurts ChatGPT! When you realize the worst group is approaching a 40+ age asymptote (then “smiles”), the curve looks even better.
Such curves are usually reserved for markets with network effects or social products, meaning as more users join, they improve (e.g., Uber with more drivers/riders, or Instagram with more friends). For a solo product without social features, such retention is impressive.
Beyond retention, AI apps also see increased engagement. Here’s a visual showing this trend:
Overall, it’s a very impressive growth in usage.
In 2017, Netflix’s Reed Hastings famously said their biggest competitor is sleep. Netflix’s business is about absorbing more viewing time (more hours watched = better retention + willingness to pay), so sleep directly conflicts with their business model.
Now, we see media usage plateauing at about 12.75 hours per day:
AI usage growth must come at the expense of time spent elsewhere. Maybe Claude’s biggest competitor is sleep? I also imagine Netflix, YouTube, TikTok are watching the above AI usage chart carefully. Half an hour on Gemini is half an hour not watching short videos. AI tools are clearly more than just Google replacements; they’re also social + content products. Once media generation really takes off, we’ll see engagement metrics of large incumbents under huge pressure.
Healthcare drives employment
Healthcare is the largest employment category in the US, about 15%. It’s the engine behind nearly all job growth. Look at this chart:
Overall, healthcare will drive about 40% of new jobs over the next decade. Meanwhile, the fastest-growing single job in the US is “home health aide,” driven by rapid aging of the population (10,000 Americans turn 65 every day).
Healthcare benefits from several tailwinds:
LLMs are well suited for healthcare management, a trillion-dollar market because healthcare relies on language.
Consumers are increasingly willing to measure, personalize, and spend on their health.
Telemedicine is expanding access, aided by new regulations post-pandemic that broaden coverage.
Our population is aging and becoming sicker. The “silver tsunami,” etc.
Many healthcare jobs are also “AI-protected,” which I interpret as meaning we’ll see more young people entering healthcare.
Secondary market reshaping VC + employee returns
This is an underestimated shift in venture capital. The secondary market now rivals IPOs and M&A exits:
Source: Tomasz Tunguz on Twitter
This changes the game for early-stage funds like Daybreak and startup employees. Liquidity timelines are compressed. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see funds returning multiples of invested capital through secondary sales during growth-stage financings. It’s not new—Roger Ehrenberg of IA Ventures has publicly discussed selling about 2.5 million shares of The Trade Desk in secondary sales to LPs—but it’s becoming more common.
For employees, they no longer have to wait over 10 years to get some liquidity. Clay and ElevenLabs each completed two secondary acquisitions in the past 12 months, and Anthropic is currently in a $6 billion (!) buyout process. The latter will undoubtedly shake up the SF real estate market.
Gen Z: the last generation in the alphabet
Kalshi reports that Super Bowl betting volume exceeded $1 billion on Sunday, up 2,700% (!) year-over-year. Here’s a chart of predicted market trading volume for the Super Bowl, showing a 1,205% increase over six months:
These markets are new and controversial. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt abruptly ended a briefing in early January, sparking insider trading concerns:
During the Super Bowl, my partner placed a small bet on Cardi B’s appearance on stage with Bad Bunny. He lost that bet, and Kalshi said performers must sing to count as “performance.” This led to at least one complaint to the CFTC. It’s the wild west!
But despite the controversy, I believe prediction markets will stick around. Last fall, we wrote about the rise of prediction markets in “Speculation Nation.” That article focused on enabling technologies colliding with Gen Z behaviors, including the rise of FAFOnomics (FAFO = Fuck Around and Find Out).
My friend Jackson Denka wrote an interesting piece this week titled “Financial Nihilism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Market.” He calls Gen Z “the last generation in the alphabet,” which struck me. Some stats he cites:
Unemployment among US college grads in 2025 is 9.3%, higher than during the Great Financial Crisis
The top 1% of households hold nearly 30% of the country’s wealth
Average age of first-time homebuyers is now 40
No wonder we’re becoming a speculative economy? If upward economic mobility is Sisyphean, why not bet everything for a shot at wealth? Not a good thing, but I see it as one of the defining undercurrents for the next generation.
Peptides and Reta
Amid the AI buzz, it’s easy to overlook other seismic shifts. I’ve been spending a lot of time in one such area: peptides, which are gaining mainstream attention.
Peptides are amino acid chains that serve as signaling molecules in your body. The most famous are Ozempic and Wegovy, brand names for the peptide semaglutide. The peptide market is booming because consumers are genuinely interested and willing to pay. My friend Khushi said it well in this tweet:
Our first investment in 2026 will be a peptide company, System Labs, launched last week. Unveiling peptides to everyday consumers, becoming a trusted source for safe, reliable peptides in the US, has huge potential.
Here’s the market’s expected growth:
The most undervalued drug right now is Retatrutide, or Reta. Lilly’s Reta is a triple agonist, while Ozempic is a single agonist; Reta targets three receptors: GLP-1, GIP, and Glucagon. This means the drug enhances satiety, improves insulin sensitivity, and boosts metabolism (fat burning). Ozempic only targets GLP-1, mainly focusing on appetite reduction.
Reta is a potential trillion-dollar drug. Here’s a chart of Reta’s weight loss effects:
Source: CTCD
Expect to hear more about Reta soon.
Gaming landscape
Matthew Ball released a long report last week on the state of gaming. Here are some highlights:
Gaming remains the largest media category, with $200 billion annual spend, surpassing movies, TV, and music combined. After a brief dip post-COVID, growth has resumed:
Mobile drives much of the growth:
Despite market growth, VC funding has declined significantly since the pandemic peak:
AI will reshape gaming, though it’s not fully there yet (we’re still mostly in the text phase). Soon, game generation rather than rendering will become standard, opening new possibilities for storytelling and world-building.
Returning to our earlier point about AI competing with sleep and Netflix: we may also see AI applications encroach on gaming time. This tweet resonated with me:
The most impressive company in gaming remains Roblox, which has driven much of the growth:
Roblox now has 150 million daily active users, with a particularly rapid increase in users over 13:
Roblox’s average engagement now exceeds the combined total of Steam, PlayStation, and Fortnite.
Calls for more Agent usage
Here’s an interesting chart showing Anthropic agent calls across industries:
Clearly, there are huge opportunities outside software engineering. Or as Garry Tan said:
Regarding what will happen to these jobs: I think the workforce impact will be slower. We’ve written extensively about the Jevons paradox here. Here’s a good visual from Coatue about ATM jobs:
People thought ATMs would destroy bank tellers. Instead, from 1970 to 1988, the number of bank tellers increased by 81%, enjoying four decades of steady growth.
Citrini sell-off
Another week, another viral blog post. This week, it’s a Citrini Substack article that triggered market sell-offs:
What’s crazy to me is that a casual article about the future, with no facts or data, can spark such widespread market panic. To me, it’s a sign that (1) the market is overheated and looking for reasons to correct, and (2) we’re officially in the meme economy.
I find the article quite naive. Fintech and market companies are harder to disrupt than Citrini suggests. Tony Xu of DoorDash had a good response.
The real lesson from the Citrini sell-off: nobody really knows what will happen.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
AI, Healthcare, VC..., 10 Charts Capturing Changes in the World
Author: Rex Woodbury
Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow
Deep Tide Introduction: Rex Woodbury of Daybreak Ventures summarizes key trends for early 2026 with 10 charts.
Key Findings:
(1) Newspaper stocks crashed five years before earnings declined; SaaS stocks are now repeating this pattern;
(2) 84% of humans have never used AI, with only 0.3% paying for it;
(3) AI application usage time has surged, competing with Netflix and TikTok for attention;
(4) Healthcare accounts for 15% of US employment, driving nearly 100% of job growth;
(5) The secondary market is now on par with IPOs and M&A;
(6) Gen Z’s “financial nihilism”: first-time homebuyers average age is 40, better to gamble;
(7) Retatrutide (Lilly’s new drug) could be a trillion-dollar peptide;
(8) Gaming market worth $200 billion, Roblox user engagement surpasses Steam + PS + Fortnite;
(9) 50% of Anthropic agent calls are in software engineering;
(10) Citrini research report triggers market panic selling — we live in a meme economy.
Full text below:
It’s that time again: time for another “10 Charts” series.
I try to do this quarterly, but we’re overdue: the last one was in October. This is our 11th edition (!), and you know the rules: I’m a visual learner, charts help me process information. Charts are also an effective way to show how the world is changing.
We’ll cover 10 charts on a wide range of topics:
Newspaper stocks vs. earnings
Still the first game
AI application usage
Healthcare drives employment
Secondary market reshaping VC + employee returns
Gen Z: the last generation in the alphabet
Peptides and Reta
Gaming landscape
Calls for more Agent usage
Citrini sell-off
Without further ado…
Newspaper stocks vs. earnings
This chart shows the comparison between newspaper stocks and earnings. You can see that stocks crashed about five years before earnings declined, indicating the market saw the warning signs before the profit and loss statements reflected trouble.
Source: Twitter; thanks to Emily Man for sending
Of course, there’s some time lag; the decline in forward earnings coincided with the Great Recession. But directionally, it seems accurate—the market anticipated the internet disrupting newspapers. We’re seeing this again now, with SaaS stocks crashing last month before AI disruption.
As we wrote last week, SaaSpocalypse (the SaaS apocalypse) takes time to unfold. I attended a panel discussion this week where one member said “Campbell Soup won’t vibe-code their own CRM,” a clever way to say software profits are compressing, and the “new normal” is 70% gross margin instead of 90%.
On the long timeline for AI to unfold…
Still the first game
This is a cool visualization of where we are in the AI adoption cycle. Each dot represents 3.2 million people. There are 2,500 dots, totaling 810 million people.
Gray = 6.8 billion who have never used AI
Green = 1.3 billion free users
Yellow = 15-35 million paid users
Red = 2-5 million coders
Source: Noah Epstein on Twitter
Approximately 84% of the world has never used AI, and only 0.3% (!) pay for AI products. This is one of the best visualizations I’ve seen showing how early we still are.
AI application usage time
In our previous “10 Charts” edition, we looked at ChatGPT’s “smile curve”:
From that article:
This chart commits what I call the “Y-axis crime,” meaning the Y-axis is misleadingly not starting at zero. But in this case, the Y-axis crime actually hurts ChatGPT! When you realize the worst group is approaching a 40+ age asymptote (then “smiles”), the curve looks even better.
Such curves are usually reserved for markets with network effects or social products, meaning as more users join, they improve (e.g., Uber with more drivers/riders, or Instagram with more friends). For a solo product without social features, such retention is impressive.
Beyond retention, AI apps also see increased engagement. Here’s a visual showing this trend:
Overall, it’s a very impressive growth in usage.
In 2017, Netflix’s Reed Hastings famously said their biggest competitor is sleep. Netflix’s business is about absorbing more viewing time (more hours watched = better retention + willingness to pay), so sleep directly conflicts with their business model.
Now, we see media usage plateauing at about 12.75 hours per day:
AI usage growth must come at the expense of time spent elsewhere. Maybe Claude’s biggest competitor is sleep? I also imagine Netflix, YouTube, TikTok are watching the above AI usage chart carefully. Half an hour on Gemini is half an hour not watching short videos. AI tools are clearly more than just Google replacements; they’re also social + content products. Once media generation really takes off, we’ll see engagement metrics of large incumbents under huge pressure.
Healthcare drives employment
Healthcare is the largest employment category in the US, about 15%. It’s the engine behind nearly all job growth. Look at this chart:
Overall, healthcare will drive about 40% of new jobs over the next decade. Meanwhile, the fastest-growing single job in the US is “home health aide,” driven by rapid aging of the population (10,000 Americans turn 65 every day).
Healthcare benefits from several tailwinds:
LLMs are well suited for healthcare management, a trillion-dollar market because healthcare relies on language.
Consumers are increasingly willing to measure, personalize, and spend on their health.
Telemedicine is expanding access, aided by new regulations post-pandemic that broaden coverage.
Our population is aging and becoming sicker. The “silver tsunami,” etc.
Many healthcare jobs are also “AI-protected,” which I interpret as meaning we’ll see more young people entering healthcare.
Secondary market reshaping VC + employee returns
This is an underestimated shift in venture capital. The secondary market now rivals IPOs and M&A exits:
Source: Tomasz Tunguz on Twitter
This changes the game for early-stage funds like Daybreak and startup employees. Liquidity timelines are compressed. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see funds returning multiples of invested capital through secondary sales during growth-stage financings. It’s not new—Roger Ehrenberg of IA Ventures has publicly discussed selling about 2.5 million shares of The Trade Desk in secondary sales to LPs—but it’s becoming more common.
For employees, they no longer have to wait over 10 years to get some liquidity. Clay and ElevenLabs each completed two secondary acquisitions in the past 12 months, and Anthropic is currently in a $6 billion (!) buyout process. The latter will undoubtedly shake up the SF real estate market.
Gen Z: the last generation in the alphabet
Kalshi reports that Super Bowl betting volume exceeded $1 billion on Sunday, up 2,700% (!) year-over-year. Here’s a chart of predicted market trading volume for the Super Bowl, showing a 1,205% increase over six months:
These markets are new and controversial. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt abruptly ended a briefing in early January, sparking insider trading concerns:
During the Super Bowl, my partner placed a small bet on Cardi B’s appearance on stage with Bad Bunny. He lost that bet, and Kalshi said performers must sing to count as “performance.” This led to at least one complaint to the CFTC. It’s the wild west!
But despite the controversy, I believe prediction markets will stick around. Last fall, we wrote about the rise of prediction markets in “Speculation Nation.” That article focused on enabling technologies colliding with Gen Z behaviors, including the rise of FAFOnomics (FAFO = Fuck Around and Find Out).
My friend Jackson Denka wrote an interesting piece this week titled “Financial Nihilism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Market.” He calls Gen Z “the last generation in the alphabet,” which struck me. Some stats he cites:
Unemployment among US college grads in 2025 is 9.3%, higher than during the Great Financial Crisis
The top 1% of households hold nearly 30% of the country’s wealth
Average age of first-time homebuyers is now 40
No wonder we’re becoming a speculative economy? If upward economic mobility is Sisyphean, why not bet everything for a shot at wealth? Not a good thing, but I see it as one of the defining undercurrents for the next generation.
Peptides and Reta
Amid the AI buzz, it’s easy to overlook other seismic shifts. I’ve been spending a lot of time in one such area: peptides, which are gaining mainstream attention.
Peptides are amino acid chains that serve as signaling molecules in your body. The most famous are Ozempic and Wegovy, brand names for the peptide semaglutide. The peptide market is booming because consumers are genuinely interested and willing to pay. My friend Khushi said it well in this tweet:
Our first investment in 2026 will be a peptide company, System Labs, launched last week. Unveiling peptides to everyday consumers, becoming a trusted source for safe, reliable peptides in the US, has huge potential.
Here’s the market’s expected growth:
The most undervalued drug right now is Retatrutide, or Reta. Lilly’s Reta is a triple agonist, while Ozempic is a single agonist; Reta targets three receptors: GLP-1, GIP, and Glucagon. This means the drug enhances satiety, improves insulin sensitivity, and boosts metabolism (fat burning). Ozempic only targets GLP-1, mainly focusing on appetite reduction.
Reta is a potential trillion-dollar drug. Here’s a chart of Reta’s weight loss effects:
Source: CTCD
Expect to hear more about Reta soon.
Gaming landscape
Matthew Ball released a long report last week on the state of gaming. Here are some highlights:
Gaming remains the largest media category, with $200 billion annual spend, surpassing movies, TV, and music combined. After a brief dip post-COVID, growth has resumed:
Mobile drives much of the growth:
Despite market growth, VC funding has declined significantly since the pandemic peak:
AI will reshape gaming, though it’s not fully there yet (we’re still mostly in the text phase). Soon, game generation rather than rendering will become standard, opening new possibilities for storytelling and world-building.
Returning to our earlier point about AI competing with sleep and Netflix: we may also see AI applications encroach on gaming time. This tweet resonated with me:
The most impressive company in gaming remains Roblox, which has driven much of the growth:
Roblox now has 150 million daily active users, with a particularly rapid increase in users over 13:
Roblox’s average engagement now exceeds the combined total of Steam, PlayStation, and Fortnite.
Calls for more Agent usage
Here’s an interesting chart showing Anthropic agent calls across industries:
Clearly, there are huge opportunities outside software engineering. Or as Garry Tan said:
Regarding what will happen to these jobs: I think the workforce impact will be slower. We’ve written extensively about the Jevons paradox here. Here’s a good visual from Coatue about ATM jobs:
People thought ATMs would destroy bank tellers. Instead, from 1970 to 1988, the number of bank tellers increased by 81%, enjoying four decades of steady growth.
Citrini sell-off
Another week, another viral blog post. This week, it’s a Citrini Substack article that triggered market sell-offs:
What’s crazy to me is that a casual article about the future, with no facts or data, can spark such widespread market panic. To me, it’s a sign that (1) the market is overheated and looking for reasons to correct, and (2) we’re officially in the meme economy.
I find the article quite naive. Fintech and market companies are harder to disrupt than Citrini suggests. Tony Xu of DoorDash had a good response.
The real lesson from the Citrini sell-off: nobody really knows what will happen.