Recently, the community has been repeatedly posting about unlocking the calendar, asking every day "Is the selling pressure coming..." I actually want to see if the treasury spending aligns with milestones. Frankly, a team that is truly working won't just have a big basket of expenses like "market/BD/consultant fees"; at least they should tie spending to deliverables: how much subsidy is issued this month, and how much activity/retention it brings. If targets aren't met, they should reduce or delay payments. I'm most afraid of milestones that are written as grand as a novel, but in reality, only a PPT is delivered each quarter, and the treasury still makes timely payments.

I also admit to envying the core team for confidently drawing their salaries... but as a voting outsider, the only things I can focus on are: whether the money spent results in verifiable outcomes, and whether there is a "deduction mechanism" if goals aren't achieved. Unlocking anxiety is one thing, but reckless spending by the treasury is a chronic poison. That's all for now.