The core advantage of IMU is not in its price, but in the "initial holder structure."

Many people participate in Launchpad only concerned with opening price increases, but they overlook a more important issue: **who holds the first batch of tokens.** IMU distributes tokens through Gate Launchpad, which determines that its early holders are mainly platform users, rather than highly concentrated private placements or early-stage capital.

This distribution method naturally helps reduce extreme selling pressure. Launchpad users generally understand the participation rules and are more willing to realize gains gradually rather than clearing out all at once upon listing. Historical experience shows that projects that can go further are often not the ones with the biggest gains on the first day, but those with the most stable token structure.

The value of IMU does not lie in "whether it can multiply several times," but in whether it can establish a healthy secondary market foundation. Once the token distribution is unbalanced too early, no amount of subsequent good news can easily fix it.
Therefore, in terms of operation, I prefer: taking profits in stages while retaining a core position to observe project progress, rather than a one-time buy and sell.

If you view Launchpad as part of a long-term system rather than a one-time arbitrage tool, the experience of participating in IMU will be completely different.
#GateLaunchpadIMU