After a round of deep adjustment, the attention of the crypto market has returned to infrastructure that can truly solve practical problems. In this new cycle, many developers and capital are re-evaluating projects with real application scenarios and mature technical solutions. Among them, second-layer scaling solutions like Plasma are gradually gaining more attention, and this category of scaling approach seems to have the potential to become a dark horse in this round.



Speaking of the core value of Plasma, it cannot be avoided that the old topic of the "Impossible Triangle"—decentralization, security, and scalability—remains a challenge for traditional public chains to achieve all three simultaneously. The underlying design philosophy of Plasma is to find breakthroughs within this constraint. Through innovative protocol architecture, it can achieve very high transaction throughput without sacrificing security, while keeping the cost of each transaction nearly negligible. This is highly significant for DeFi ecosystems and payment applications—low cost and high efficiency are fundamentally the core requirements of these scenarios.

Looking at the design of the ecosystem token XPL, any public chain or protocol that aims to operate effectively needs a complete economic model to support it. As the native token of Plasma, XPL carries several key roles: firstly, as the network’s fuel—users need to spend it for various operations; secondly, as a vehicle for governance—holders have the right to participate in protocol upgrade decisions; and more deeply, as an incentive mechanism for ecosystem participants. As more ecosystem applications emerge, the token’s value support is gradually being established. This logical structure is relatively sound, ensuring the sustainable operation of the network while giving the community a real sense of participation.

Overall, for Plasma to stand out, it relies not on hype but on solving real industry pain points. Of course, the competition in the scaling track is fierce, with various solutions making different trade-offs. The ones that truly survive and grow will still depend on practical application support and ecosystem development.
XPL-2,98%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEV_Whisperervip
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but can Plasma really beat Arbitrum and Optimism? It's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000vip
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but can it really survive with so many scaling solutions?
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 8h ago
To be honest, the current hype around Plasma is indeed different this time. Wait, can XPL really support this economic model, or is it just the usual trick? With so many scaling solutions, who survives until the end will ultimately depend on the TVL.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 8h ago
That's a nice way to put it, but can plasma really beat arbitrum and optimism?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 8h ago
Black Horse sounds good, but let's see if it can really run before praising it. That said, the economic model design of XPL is indeed interesting. How about the burn mechanism? Is Plasma relying on applications? Then let's see what real scenarios are currently in use. This round, a bunch of Black Horses are hyped again, but in the end, only a few survive.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)