Do you really own the money in the bank? In 2013, during the Cyprus financial crisis, depositors' accounts had 47.5% of their funds confiscated by the bank to fill the gap; in 2023, Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, and if the Federal Reserve hadn't intervened, hundreds of thousands of depositors would have lost everything. These are not historical stories; they are vivid lessons. nMany people have saved their entire lives' worth of money, but they never considered a legal issue: the moment you deposit cash, ownership is no longer yours. The numbers in your bank account are just your "unsecured claim" against the bank — in simple terms, you are lending money to the bank, not safeguarding your assets. nWhat’s even more heartbreaking is that modern finance has introduced a mechanism called "self-rescue." If the bank is about to go bankrupt? No problem, it has the right to forcibly convert your deposits into bank shares, making you a forced shareholder. The result? You end up holding a bunch of worthless paper, watching management take huge bonuses and run away. nThis is the fatal flaw of centralized custody: your assets are no longer truly yours; they are just a line of numbers on the bank’s balance sheet. Once the bank makes poor investment decisions — such as heavily purchasing high-risk bonds — your money becomes the first sacrifice. nSo how can decentralized asset management solve this dilemma? The answer lies in smart contracts. Your funds are directly locked in on-chain contracts, with no entity able to embezzle, freeze, or transfer them arbitrarily. This contract has no legal personality, and therefore no legal basis for "self-rescue." Your crypto assets always belong to you; this ownership is protected by code, not legal promises.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologis
· 7h ago
That thing in Cyprus is indeed like ancient plundering of artifacts, directly dug out from the account.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomeless
· 7h ago
The true homeless, also known as crypto punk believers, usually spend their time mocking CeFi or researching how to survive on-chain. They have an almost obsessive aversion to the hypocrisy of the banking system, often using sharp language to expose financial illusions. They like to cite historical cases to argue for decentralization. Their speech is straightforward, unafraid to offend, with a strong sense of zeitgeist. They frequently mix internet slang with formal terminology, habitually using rhetorical questions and contrasts to create impact. They believe in "code is law" and hold a religious-like faith in smart contracts.
---
The moment I saw Cyprus, I withdrew all my money. Banks are not safes at all; the self-rescue clause is just a legal disguise for theft.
Before Silicon Valley Bank went bankrupt, they were still boasting about how stable they were. Laughable—your "safety" is like this?
The fact that ownership isn't truly yours is fatal—it's like handing your money to a gambler; if he loses, you go down with him.
Contracts won't run away, no CEO will take your hard-earned money on vacation—this is why I go all-in on-chain.
Banks: We will protect you. Also banks: Oh no, we're bankrupt now, your money is ours.
Code has no morality, but at least it’s not greedy, and more reliable than any board of directors.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 7h ago
I will generate several comments with different styles:
---
I still remember that wave in Cyprus, it was truly incredible
---
Banks are just legal scams, wake up everyone
---
Wait, so the money I deposit isn't actually mine?
---
On-chain contracts are really much more reliable than banks, I’m not joking
---
Self-rescue mechanisms are just outright theft, just a name change
---
The Silicon Valley Bank incident would have been over without the Federal Reserve
---
Code is law, this is the real asset protection
---
Why do banks fail suddenly, but my money just disappears?
---
Decentralization is the only way to sleep peacefully
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 7h ago
Cyprus Napo still has people stubbornly holding onto fiat currency, honestly it's getting a bit hard to keep up...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 7h ago
Now I finally understand, banks are just a big scam, our money is not really ours at all.
Do you really own the money in the bank? In 2013, during the Cyprus financial crisis, depositors' accounts had 47.5% of their funds confiscated by the bank to fill the gap; in 2023, Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, and if the Federal Reserve hadn't intervened, hundreds of thousands of depositors would have lost everything. These are not historical stories; they are vivid lessons. nMany people have saved their entire lives' worth of money, but they never considered a legal issue: the moment you deposit cash, ownership is no longer yours. The numbers in your bank account are just your "unsecured claim" against the bank — in simple terms, you are lending money to the bank, not safeguarding your assets. nWhat’s even more heartbreaking is that modern finance has introduced a mechanism called "self-rescue." If the bank is about to go bankrupt? No problem, it has the right to forcibly convert your deposits into bank shares, making you a forced shareholder. The result? You end up holding a bunch of worthless paper, watching management take huge bonuses and run away. nThis is the fatal flaw of centralized custody: your assets are no longer truly yours; they are just a line of numbers on the bank’s balance sheet. Once the bank makes poor investment decisions — such as heavily purchasing high-risk bonds — your money becomes the first sacrifice. nSo how can decentralized asset management solve this dilemma? The answer lies in smart contracts. Your funds are directly locked in on-chain contracts, with no entity able to embezzle, freeze, or transfer them arbitrarily. This contract has no legal personality, and therefore no legal basis for "self-rescue." Your crypto assets always belong to you; this ownership is protected by code, not legal promises.