The time costs in traditional financial systems have long been taken for granted. Cross-border transfers take three days, compliance approvals can take half a month, and regulatory responses may be indefinitely delayed. These delays seem to be technical bottlenecks, but fundamentally they are necessary trade-offs made by the system to maintain stability and control risks. When blockchain emerged, it promised "second-level settlement," indeed reducing some delays, but new problems arose: transparency requires exposing privacy, while privacy sacrifices verifiability. Under this dilemma, new delays were created—waiting for privacy verification, waiting for trust to be established.



It may seem like a vicious cycle. But Dusk Network took a different approach: instead of eliminating all delays, it categorizes and handles them. Some delays are necessary and worth optimizing; others are useless friction that should be cut outright. Through a three-layer architecture, it transforms those delays caused by conflicts between transparency and privacy into controllable, predictable, and even programmable processes.

This is true progress—not barbarically speeding everything up, but intelligently managing time allocation.
DUSK-0.46%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainDecodervip
· 4h ago
From a technical architecture perspective, this article highlights a key point—delay classification is indeed more valuable than simply pursuing speed. Research shows that the time cost of traditional systems is essentially the price of risk management, not just a technical issue. The blockchain concept of "second-level settlement" data indicates that many projects ultimately fall into the privacy-verifiability paradox. The three-layer architecture approach of Dusk Network is noteworthy because it transforms a deadlock into a programmable process, which is a true paradigm shift. However, the specific implementation still depends on on-chain data.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatchervip
· 5h ago
Well said, this is a pragmatic approach. Instead of blindly rushing to achieve a one-step solution, it's better to eliminate unnecessary friction and carefully design the processes that should be preserved. The slow pace of traditional finance comes at a cost, but blindly pursuing speed in Web3 also invites trouble. The three-layer architecture concept of dusk is indeed interesting, transforming the contradiction between privacy and transparency into manageable variables. This is not something that simple acceleration can achieve.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 5h ago
I've said it before, not all delays should be cut, it depends on which ones. Dusk's approach is still somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreamsvip
· 5h ago
Damn, someone finally said it. The crypto world keeps touting second-level settlement every day, but privacy and transparency are at odds. Delays just move somewhere else to continue tormenting people.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 5h ago
Instead of stressing over whether it's millisecond or not, it's better to first understand whether latency should exist at all.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 5h ago
Haha, well said. Not all delays should be cut; the key is to cut in the right places.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)