#机构投资者入场 Institutional funds are quietly entering the market, and this signal is quite interesting.
Bitcoin has stabilized from $88,000 to the current $92,000. It seems like a rebound, but I am more focused on the changes in the underlying fund structure—reflow of spot ETFs, expansion of stablecoins, and institutions rebalancing for the new fiscal year. All these point in the same direction: big players are positioning themselves.
This has a very direct implication for copy trading strategies: institutional entry means volatility will gradually converge, and those traders who rely on emotional trading will become less effective. Instead, those with strict risk controls and the ability to consistently implement position-splitting strategies are becoming more worth following. Recently, I adjusted my copy trading pool—abandoning a few accounts with short-term high returns but extreme volatility, and increasing the weighting of traders with controllable drawdowns and strong monthly stability.
The short-term critical support level is $91,500. If it doesn't hold, there might be a retest, but in the long run, this structure justifies an expectation of $120,000 to $150,000. The question is, have you also adjusted your risk preferences in your copy trading positions accordingly? Markets dominated by institutions and markets driven by retail investor sentiment are completely different in gameplay.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#机构投资者入场 Institutional funds are quietly entering the market, and this signal is quite interesting.
Bitcoin has stabilized from $88,000 to the current $92,000. It seems like a rebound, but I am more focused on the changes in the underlying fund structure—reflow of spot ETFs, expansion of stablecoins, and institutions rebalancing for the new fiscal year. All these point in the same direction: big players are positioning themselves.
This has a very direct implication for copy trading strategies: institutional entry means volatility will gradually converge, and those traders who rely on emotional trading will become less effective. Instead, those with strict risk controls and the ability to consistently implement position-splitting strategies are becoming more worth following. Recently, I adjusted my copy trading pool—abandoning a few accounts with short-term high returns but extreme volatility, and increasing the weighting of traders with controllable drawdowns and strong monthly stability.
The short-term critical support level is $91,500. If it doesn't hold, there might be a retest, but in the long run, this structure justifies an expectation of $120,000 to $150,000. The question is, have you also adjusted your risk preferences in your copy trading positions accordingly? Markets dominated by institutions and markets driven by retail investor sentiment are completely different in gameplay.