2026-01-21 11:27:05

The combination of AI and blockchain in the market has become so common that most are either hype-driven concepts or technical patchworks without practical application. Unlike these, Vanar Chain treats AI as a core part of the infrastructure from the architecture design stage, rather than an afterthought or a patch.

How significant is this "native gene" difference? Imagine if ordinary people had a well-planned framework in advance; it would definitely be more efficient than patching things up afterward. The Web3 ecosystem is not short of underlying chains, but it lacks infrastructure that can truly support AI system operation. Vanar Chain targets this key point—AI-native memory architecture, reasoning capabilities, automated processing, and on-chain settlement, which are more solid than simply pursuing TPS speed.

Even more valuable is that this is not just a technical white paper. myNeutron embeds semantic memory capabilities into the base layer, so AI doesn't have to "start from zero" every time; Kayon makes on-chain reasoning processes transparent and explainable, eliminating the risk of black-box operations; Flows transforms intelligent decision-making into secure automated execution. These are not laboratory prototypes but product-level solutions that can truly serve developers.

Interestingly, activities like CreatorPad seem to be testing whether this system can meet actual needs, which is more meaningful than empty hype. When the underlying infrastructure is sufficiently mature, that will be the moment when AI and blockchain truly bear fruit.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
2
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanPrince

· 4h ago

Finally someone spoke out, the overused AI chain should have been regulated long ago --- Native design is truly different; this is what infrastructure should look like --- MyNeutron's semantic memory is quite interesting; no need to retrain every time --- Compared to hyping TPS, I prefer this solid underlying solution --- CreatorPad's verification system? This approach is reliable, not just on paper --- I'm interested in Kayon's transparent reasoning; the black box risk is indeed a pain point --- Another "native AI," whether it's real or not depends on whether it can actually run --- Web3 lacks projects that think things through like this; stop just hyping concepts

View OriginalReply0

TokenSleuth

· 4h ago

Someone finally said it—I'm really tired of those AI shell projects. Speaking of which, integrating AI into the architecture from the very beginning is definitely more reliable than patching it later. Projects like myNeutron and Kayon are not just talk—they're what I want to see. Only when the underlying infrastructure is solid can it truly run smoothly. CreatorPad testing whether this setup works is more interesting than just bragging. This is a practical approach, not just hyping up concepts again.

View OriginalReply0