Regarding the recent debate and misunderstandings sparked by the view that “Wintermute’s crypto traditional bull market cycle has ended,” Garrett Jin, an agent of “### insider giant whale,” clarified on the X platform that this interpretation deviates from the original intent. Wintermute’s true stance is: institutions have not ended the bull market, but have changed its nature. As institutional asset sizes increase, the market is undergoing a profound shift from a speculation-driven to a allocation-driven phase. This is not the end of the cycle but an upgrade of the market mechanism.
Misinterpreted Viewpoint and True Meaning
Clarification of the viewpoint: The cycle is not dead, just transformed
According to Garrett Jin’s clarification, interpreting Wintermute as believing “the traditional bull market cycle has ended” is overly absolute. In fact, Wintermute aims to express:
The bull market itself has not ended, but its driving forces have shifted
Institutional participation has changed the mechanism of the bull market, rather than ending it
The market is evolving from a speculative tool to a configurable asset, representing a structural upgrade rather than a decline
Core logic of the market structure shift
Dimension
Traditional speculation phase
New configuration phase
Main participants
Retail-driven
Institutional positioning
Price characteristics
High volatility, rapid rise
Reduced volatility, steady increase
Asset attributes
Speculative tool
Configurable asset
Market theme
Meme dominance
Fundamentals-driven
Capital nature
Short-term hot money
Long-term allocation funds
Garrett Jin pointed out that with the growth of institutional asset management scale, two key changes are occurring:
Asset prices tend to rise: Continuous inflow of institutional funds provides stable buying support
Volatility decreases: Large sums of money entering and exiting become more cautious, narrowing market fluctuations
How current market data confirms this shift
Specific manifestations of institutional participation
Recent data shows that institutional involvement in the crypto market is indeed deepening:
ETF funds continue to flow in: Last Tuesday, a single-day net inflow of $760 million, totaling $1.4 billion for the week, indicating stable institutional allocation demand
Whale bottom-fishing behavior: Trend Research borrowed $70 million USDT from Aave to buy 24,555 ETH (worth $75.5 million); OTC whales purchased 20,000 ETH (worth $58.8 million) via FalconX and Wintermute
Market makers active: Market makers like Wintermute continue to participate amid market volatility, providing liquidity support
BTC/ETH performance reflects
As of now, BTC is priced at $89,262.84, down 2.21% in the past 24 hours, but Wintermute’s analysis considers this a “healthy correction.” Key points include:
Market cap remains stable: BTC market cap holds at $1.78 trillion, with a high market share of 59.26%
Active trading: 24-hour trading volume is $5.11 billion, indicating ample market liquidity
Solid support: Despite $850 million in long liquidations, the market did not spiral downward, suggesting a stable buying foundation
From cycle data, institutional influence
Wintermute’s 2025 data offers an interesting perspective:
Altcoin cycles shorten: In 2025, the average altcoin rally lasts about 20 days, compared to 60 days in 2024
Implication: With institutional funds entering, market efficiency improves, speculation cycles accelerate, but individual project hype is hard to sustain long-term
Three potential triggers for recovery
Wintermute predicts that the expansion of market participation in 2026 depends on three conditions, further confirming the importance of institutional allocation mechanisms:
Broader ETF coverage: Launch of ETFs for mainstream coins like Solana, XRP, etc., will attract more institutional funds
Strong rise of BTC/ETH: The wealth effect of major coins could drive the overall market
Retail investor return: Whether retail participation recovers and can work together with institutions
Deep implications of the market shift
Why is this shift important
The transition from speculation to allocation fundamentally reflects an upgrade in the attributes of cryptocurrency assets. When institutions are willing to include crypto assets in long-term portfolios rather than short-term trading, it signifies:
Market maturity: Cryptocurrencies are integrating into the global asset allocation system
Improved volatility management: Institutional participation provides more stable market liquidity
Optimized value discovery: The market shifts from emotion-driven to fundamentals-driven
Personal opinion
From this perspective, Wintermute’s view is actually optimistic. They are not saying the bull market is over, but that it is upgrading from a “retail casino” to an “institutional allocation market.” This transition means: the crypto market is gaining stronger support, but it also reduces opportunities based solely on sentiment and hype.
Summary
The misunderstood view of Wintermute reflects an important structural transformation in the crypto market. The bull market has not ended but has changed form — evolving from a high-volatility, retail-driven speculative market to a low-volatility, institution-focused allocation market. The ongoing ETF fund inflows, institutional bottom-fishing, and decreasing market volatility all confirm this shift.
Understanding this is crucial: under the new market mechanism, strategies that chase short-term surges may become less effective, while long-term allocation could provide more stable returns. For investors, this presents both challenges (reduced high-volatility opportunities) and opportunities (improved market liquidity and stability). The key is how to adapt to this market structural change.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The truth behind Wintermute's misinterpretation: The bull market isn't over, institutions have just taken over
Regarding the recent debate and misunderstandings sparked by the view that “Wintermute’s crypto traditional bull market cycle has ended,” Garrett Jin, an agent of “### insider giant whale,” clarified on the X platform that this interpretation deviates from the original intent. Wintermute’s true stance is: institutions have not ended the bull market, but have changed its nature. As institutional asset sizes increase, the market is undergoing a profound shift from a speculation-driven to a allocation-driven phase. This is not the end of the cycle but an upgrade of the market mechanism.
Misinterpreted Viewpoint and True Meaning
Clarification of the viewpoint: The cycle is not dead, just transformed
According to Garrett Jin’s clarification, interpreting Wintermute as believing “the traditional bull market cycle has ended” is overly absolute. In fact, Wintermute aims to express:
Core logic of the market structure shift
Garrett Jin pointed out that with the growth of institutional asset management scale, two key changes are occurring:
How current market data confirms this shift
Specific manifestations of institutional participation
Recent data shows that institutional involvement in the crypto market is indeed deepening:
BTC/ETH performance reflects
As of now, BTC is priced at $89,262.84, down 2.21% in the past 24 hours, but Wintermute’s analysis considers this a “healthy correction.” Key points include:
From cycle data, institutional influence
Wintermute’s 2025 data offers an interesting perspective:
Three potential triggers for recovery
Wintermute predicts that the expansion of market participation in 2026 depends on three conditions, further confirming the importance of institutional allocation mechanisms:
Deep implications of the market shift
Why is this shift important
The transition from speculation to allocation fundamentally reflects an upgrade in the attributes of cryptocurrency assets. When institutions are willing to include crypto assets in long-term portfolios rather than short-term trading, it signifies:
Personal opinion
From this perspective, Wintermute’s view is actually optimistic. They are not saying the bull market is over, but that it is upgrading from a “retail casino” to an “institutional allocation market.” This transition means: the crypto market is gaining stronger support, but it also reduces opportunities based solely on sentiment and hype.
Summary
The misunderstood view of Wintermute reflects an important structural transformation in the crypto market. The bull market has not ended but has changed form — evolving from a high-volatility, retail-driven speculative market to a low-volatility, institution-focused allocation market. The ongoing ETF fund inflows, institutional bottom-fishing, and decreasing market volatility all confirm this shift.
Understanding this is crucial: under the new market mechanism, strategies that chase short-term surges may become less effective, while long-term allocation could provide more stable returns. For investors, this presents both challenges (reduced high-volatility opportunities) and opportunities (improved market liquidity and stability). The key is how to adapt to this market structural change.