Malaysia has lifted its previous block on Grok AI after X implemented enhanced safety protocols. The move reflects growing dialogue between tech platforms and regional regulators around responsible AI deployment. X's compliance updates appear to have addressed the authorities' earlier concerns, paving the way for the service to operate in the market. This development highlights the ongoing tension between innovation and regulation in AI governance—particularly relevant as major platforms navigate different jurisdictional requirements while maintaining functionality.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 14h ago
Once regulation is compromised, innovation begins to exploit loopholes. The recent situation in Malaysia is the same; safety protocols are just for show, behind the scenes it's still driven by commercial interests. If we really scrutinize it, the actual code quality of these "enhanced security protocols" is comparable to some broken smart contracts—it's just a matter of signing a few more documents. But on the other hand, this model is actually a replica of DeFi governance—claiming to control risks while implicitly accepting the existence of high-risk arbitrage opportunities.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 14h ago
grok can finally be used in Malaysia. Let's consider it progress. That's how we keep compromising; the space for innovation is getting smaller and smaller.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 14h ago
Starting to play the compliance game again, but can we really control AI?
Malaysia has lifted its previous block on Grok AI after X implemented enhanced safety protocols. The move reflects growing dialogue between tech platforms and regional regulators around responsible AI deployment. X's compliance updates appear to have addressed the authorities' earlier concerns, paving the way for the service to operate in the market. This development highlights the ongoing tension between innovation and regulation in AI governance—particularly relevant as major platforms navigate different jurisdictional requirements while maintaining functionality.