The limits of the White House's stance in questioning during the U.S. Supreme Court's hearing of the "Trump v. Federal Reserve's Powell" case

GateNews

2026-01-21 15:21:30

Odaily Planet Daily reported that today, during the Supreme Court hearing of the case “Trump v. Federal Reserve Chair Powell,” U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roberts asked: If Powell made an “unintentional mistake” in mortgage materials, where is the line for the White House’s stance? Whether it was an unintentional mistake or a fraudulent act to obtain a more favorable interest rate, does it make any difference to the White House? On what basis can it be concluded that the Federal Reserve is an administrative agency, and thereby determine that the President indeed has the power to dismiss? (Jin10)

View Original

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Comment

0/400

No comments