An Ethereum user lost 4.556 ETH, worth over $12.4 million, after accidentally sending funds to a fake address created by hackers in an “address poisoning” scam.
According to analyzed data, the attacker created a wallet address with the same starting and ending characters as the legitimate Galaxy Digital receiving address. Then, the hacker sent small transactions into the victim’s wallet to make this fake address appear in the transaction history, making it look familiar and trustworthy.
Due to frequent transaction habits and the desire to act quickly, the victim opened the transaction history, copied the fake address without checking the entire string of characters. This copy–paste mistake caused all 4.556 ETH to be transferred directly into the attacker’s wallet.
Address poisoning scams are increasing in the crypto space, as hackers exploit users’ tendency to only check the first and last few characters of a wallet address. Previously, at the end of 2025, another investor lost up to $50 million in a similar manner, even after attempting to transfer a small amount first. This initial test transaction was exploited by hackers to create a fake address that closely resembled the real one, leading the victim to send the remaining funds to the wrong address.
Experts advise users not to copy addresses from transaction history but to verify the entire wallet address before sending funds. Additionally, using ENS or saving trusted addresses in a wallet’s contact list can reduce risks. Some investors also suggest splitting large transactions into smaller parts instead of transferring all funds at once to limit potential losses in case of errors.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Ethereum Activity at All-Time Highs Due to Mass Capitulation - U.Today
Ethereum's network shows high activity, surpassing 2021 metrics, but this surge is due to investors selling rather than genuine demand. Liquidity is declining as users withdraw capital to exchanges, signaling potential challenges ahead.
UToday1h ago
Mega Bank's Director Rui-bin Zhuang tests stablecoin remittances, but the costs of blockchain are misunderstood.
Mega Financial Holding Co. held a media briefing on the 10th. Chairman Dong Rui-bin revealed that to objectively compare the efficiency of bank and blockchain remittances, Mega Bank mobilized 17 countries worldwide and 25 overseas branches last year for testing. Branch staff opened accounts at local legal exchanges and used the virtual asset trading platform BitoPro to trade USDT stablecoins, transferring 50 USDT each time back to Taiwan, and compared this with traditional bank cross-border wire transfers.
The results showed that stablecoins do have advantages for small-scale cross-border remittances. However, for remittance amounts exceeding the equivalent of NT$200,000 (about $7,000 USD), banks remain more cost-competitive.
Mega Experiment: Banks Are More Cost-Effective for Transfers Over $7,000 USD
The test results indicated that in the scenario of "paying NT$ in Taiwan and receiving local currency at the destination," bank wire transfers generally arrive within about 2 hours, with a fee of approximately
ChainNewsAbmedia3h ago
ETH drops 1.07% in 15 minutes: whale fund concentration triggers short-term pullback
March 10, 2026, 18:00 to 18:15 (UTC), ETH's return within the 15-minute candlestick was -1.07%, with price fluctuations ranging from 2049.1 to 2073.15 USDT, an amplitude of 1.16%. During the same period, market trading volume significantly increased by over 32%, large on-chain fund flows occurred frequently, triggering short-term market sentiment fluctuations, rapidly increasing attention, and intensifying volatility risks.
The main driver of this abnormal movement is the concentrated sell-off by whale funds. On-chain data shows that within this time window, there were four large transfers exceeding 5000 ETH, all flowing to a major...
GateNews4h ago
Tom Lee’s BitMine Acquires 60,976 ETH, Holdings Now $10.3B
Bitmine Immersion Technologies reports total assets of $10.3 billion, including 4.53M ETH. With 3.04M ETH staked, it generates $174M annually at a 2.91% yield. The firm seeks to reach 5% of total ETH supply and is expanding its staking infrastructure.
CryptoFrontNews6h ago
