
Author: XinGPT
During the Spring Festival of 2026, I made a decision: to automate all my business processes with Agents.
A week later, nearly one-third of the system was operational. Although it’s still being refined, my routine daily work tasks have decreased from 6 hours to 2 hours, yet business output has increased by 300%.
More importantly, I validated a hypothesis: Transforming personal business into an Agent-based system is feasible, and I believe everyone should build such an operating system.
Having an Agent system means your thinking shifts completely, from “How do I complete this task” to “What kind of Agent should I build to complete this task.” This shift from reactive to proactive thinking has a profound impact.
In this article, I won’t produce any AI-generated motivational clichés, nor will I deliberately create anxiety about AI replacement. Instead, I will thoroughly break down how I gradually achieved this transformation and how you can replicate this method for free.
This is the first article on building an agent productivity system. Bookmark it now and follow for future updates so you don’t miss out.

Let’s start with a harsh fact:
If your business model is “time-for-income,” then your income ceiling is already limited by physical laws. There are only 24 hours in a day. Even if you work all year round, your hourly billing limit is fixed.
Sounds high? But this is the limit of the human labor model.
The logic of Agentification is completely different: your income is no longer determined by work hours but by system efficiency.
A real turning point
On a Friday night in January 2026 at 11 pm, I was still at my computer organizing market data for the day.
That day, the US stock market plunged sharply. I needed to:
I estimated it would take at least 3 hours. The next morning at 8 am, I’d have to repeat the same process.
Suddenly, I realized: My time wasn’t spent on investment analysis and decision-making; I was just acting as a data transporter.
The decisions that truly require my judgment probably only take up 20% of the time. The remaining 80% is repetitive information collection and整理.
That was the starting point for my Agentification journey.
My investment research Agent system now automatically processes:
If done manually, this would require a team of 5 people. My cost is: $500 monthly API call fees + 1 hour of review daily.
That’s the essence of Agentification: Use algorithms to replicate your judgment framework, replacing human labor costs with API costs.
Any knowledge work can be broken down into three layers:

This is the “memory system” of the Agent.
Taking investment research as an example, I built a knowledge base containing all the information and data needed for my investments, including:
1. Historical Data
2. Key Indicators and News
3. Personal Experience Database
A concrete example: Market crash in early February 2026
In early February, the market suddenly plunged—gold and silver collapsed, cryptocurrencies flooded out, and A-shares in Hong Kong and the US stock market tumbled.
Mainstream interpretations included:
My Agent system issued an early warning 48 hours before the crash because it monitored:
These are clear signals of liquidity tightening. My knowledge base also contains a detailed review of the market volatility triggered by yen carry trades unwinding in August 2022.
The Agent system matched these historical patterns and recommended “liquidity stress + high valuation → reduce positions” before the crash.
This warning helped me avoid at least 30% of potential drawdowns.
This knowledge base contains over 500,000 structured data points, updated automatically with 200+ entries daily. Maintaining this manually would require two full-time researchers.
This is the most overlooked but most critical layer.
Most people use AI by: opening ChatGPT → asking questions → getting answers. The problem is, AI doesn’t know your judgment standards.
My approach is to decompose my decision logic into independent Skills. For example, investment decision Skills:
Skill 1: US stock value investing framework
(These are just examples; they don’t reflect my actual standards, and my criteria are updated in real-time):
Input: Company financial data
Judgment criteria:
- ROE > 15% (sustained over 3+ years)
- Debt ratio < 50%
- Free cash flow > 80% of net profit
- Moat assessment (brand/network effects/cost advantages)
Output: Investment rating (A/B/C/D) + reasoning
Skill 2: Bitcoin bottom-fishing model
Input: Bitcoin market data
Judgment criteria:
- K-line technical indicator: RSI < 30 and weekly oversold
- Trading volume: shrinking after panic sell-off (below 30-day average)
- MVRV ratio: < 1.0 (market cap below realized cap, holders at a loss)
- Social media sentiment: Twitter/Reddit panic index > 75
- Miner shutdown price: current price near or below mainstream miner shutdown cost (e.g., S19 Pro cost line)
- Long-term holder behavior: LTH supply share rising (bottom-fishing signal)
Trigger conditions:
- ≥4 indicators met → partial position build-up
- ≥5 indicators met → heavy bottom-fishing
Output: Bottom-fishing rating (Strong/Medium/Weak) + suggested position size
Skill 3: US stock market sentiment monitoring
Monitoring indicators:
- NAAIM Exposure Index: active managers’ stock holdings
- >80 and median hits 100 → warning of peak institutional buying
- Institutional stock allocation ratio (e.g., State Street)
- at 2007-highs → contrarian warning
- Retail net buying flow (tracked by JPM)
- daily buy-in > 85% of historical average → overheat sentiment
- S&P 500 forward P/E
- near 2000 or 2021 levels → divergence from fundamentals
- Hedge fund leverage
- at historical highs → potential for amplified volatility
Trigger conditions:
- 3+ indicators warning simultaneously → reduce positions
- 5 indicators warning → significant deleveraging or hedging
Output: Sentiment rating (Extreme Greed/Greed/Neutral/Fear) + position advice
Skill 4: Macro liquidity monitoring
Monitoring indicators:
- Net liquidity = Fed total assets – TGA – ON RRP
- SOFR (overnight repo rate)
- MOVE index (US bond volatility)
- USDJPY + US2Y-JP2Y spread
Trigger conditions:
- Weekly net liquidity decline >5% → warning
- SOFR >5.5% → reduce risk assets
- MOVE index >130 → stop-loss on risk assets
The essence of these Skills is: making my judgment criteria explicit and structured, so AI can operate within my thinking framework.
This is the core that makes the system truly run.
I set up the following automation tasks:

Here’s what my morning looks like now:
7:50 am: Wake up, brush teeth, check phone. Agent has already pushed the overnight global market summary:
8:10 am: Eat breakfast, open laptop for detailed analysis. Agent has generated today’s strategy:
8:30 am: Start work. I only need to make final decisions based on Agent’s analysis: whether to rebalance, how much.
The whole process takes about 30 minutes.
I no longer scramble to read news every morning; AI has prepared the briefing for me.
More importantly, investment decisions are no longer easily swayed by emotions but are based on a complete investment logic, clear judgment criteria, and iterative review based on performance. This is the correct path for investing in the AI era—not hiring a bunch of interns to work overtime updating Excel profit forecasts or blindly leveraging 50x and waiting for miracles.

My second major business is content creation, mainly on Twitter, while exploring YouTube and other video formats.
Previously, my article creation process was:
Total: 8 hours per article, with inconsistent quality.
I analyzed the biggest issues with my previous articles:
Integrating Agentification into content creation is a systematic process!
Therefore, my content-level Agentification involves three steps:

I did something many overlook: systematically study the patterns of viral articles.
Specific approach:
Examples:
Title formulas:
Opening formulas:
Argumentation structure:
I organize these patterns into a “Viral Content Framework Library” and feed it to AI.
My current content creation process has become an efficient human-AI collaboration pipeline, with clear roles at each stage.
Topic selection stage (AI leads, I decide)
Every Monday morning, my Agent automatically suggests 3-5 topics.
Input sources:
AI output format:
Topic 1: The liquidity logic behind Bitcoin surpassing $100,000
Main argument: Not demand-driven, but a result of dollar liquidity expansion
Potential hook: Data-rich + counterintuitive insight
Estimated engagement: High
Similarly for other topics.
I select the most aligned with current market sentiment and with my unique insights.
Data collection stage (AI executes, I supplement)
Once a topic is chosen, Agent automatically starts data gathering:
1. Data scraping (automated)
2. Information整理 (AI processing)
3. Human supplementation (my value add)
Writing stage (human-AI collaboration)
This is the most critical part. My division of labor with AI is very clear:
AI responsible for:
I responsible for:
Editing stage (AI assists, I lead)
After the first draft, I ask Agent to do:
1. Readability check
2. Viral element check
3. Multiple versions
This stage shortens from 1 hour to 15 minutes.
Publishing stage (automated)
Once finalized, Agent automatically:
Key insight: Content Agent is not a one-time build but a continuously evolving system.
I do weekly reviews:
For example:
I found that “data-intensive” articles (lots of numbers + charts) have 40% higher收藏率 than opinion-only articles. So I adjusted the content framework, requiring AI to:
Results: the average收藏率 of my last 5 articles increased from 8% to 12%.
In January 2026, I wrote “The Era of Agent Explosion: How Should We Respond to AI Anxiety?”
This article had less data but was highly reposted, reaching 20%.
AI analysis revealed:
I added this insight into my framework library: including philosophical reflection and value discussions in tech articles can significantly boost sharing.
This is the compound effect of the Agent system: the system helps me optimize the system. Content Agent is not a one-off; it’s a continuously evolving system.
After running my investment research and content Agent systems successfully, I started to wonder: can others do the same?
Last December, a fund manager friend told me over dinner that he was overwhelmed. He manages a private equity fund of 500 million yuan, with nearly 10 staff, but still feels driven by market news, exhausted daily.
His daily routine:
I analyzed his workflow and found:
So I spent two weeks helping him build a simplified investment research Agent:
Two weeks later, he sent me a WeChat message: “Now I have more time to think, my investment mindset is more stable.”
This project made me realize: the demand for Agentification is widespread. Reducing information processing time directly improves investment efficiency.
But I also saw two issues with pure consulting:
This led me to think about the next stage: from service to product.
Traditional software is SaaS (Software as a Service):
The future is AaaS (Agent as a Service):
The difference: SaaS sells “capability,” AaaS sells “results.”

In January, I had dinner again with that fund manager friend.
He said: “The Agent system you built is so good. I recommended it to a few peers, and they all want it. But you’re only one person—how many clients can you serve?”
I replied: “That’s indeed a problem.”
He said: “Why not turn it into a product? Like Salesforce, but not selling software—selling Agent services.”
Indeed, I believe a good Agent should be a service that replaces SaaS, just as Peter from Openclaw predicted: the future belongs to Agents, and users won’t need to install software anymore.
So I plan that once this Agent system matures, I will open-source it so everyone can copy and use. For organizations with commercial needs, advanced features can be offered via paid subscriptions or usage-based billing.

At this point, I want to share some deeper reflections.
Traditional personal business growth paths:
Agentification offers a fourth path: sell algorithmic capability.
You no longer need to:
You only need to:
This is a new kind of leverage: algorithm leverage.
Its features:
If this article resonates with you, consider taking these steps:
List your daily tasks, and mark:
Principle: Prioritize Agentify repetitive tasks, human-AI collaborate on judgment, automate execution.
A simple exercise
Take a sheet of paper, write down yesterday’s work list.
For each task, ask yourself:
You’ll find at least 50% of your work can be Agentified.
Choose a minimal viable scenario to experiment with.
Examples:
Don’t aim for perfection; just run a minimal closed loop.
Track how much time the Agent saves you, and whether output quality remains stable.
Weekly review:
When your Agent system stabilizes, consider:
If yes, congratulations—you’ve found a new business model.
In future, I’ll share how to build your Agent system using Openclaw or other cutting-edge AI tools. If you have video editing skills or are proficient with Openclaw or have developed AI projects yourself, contact me. I’m recruiting full-time partners to build the future together.
Further reading: