Approximately $7.8 trillion currently resides in U.S. money market funds, generating returns, rotating, and waiting. The Federal Reserve (Fed) began its easing cycle on September 18, 2024, and it has been 522 days since the first interest rate cut.
Based on historical cycles, the market is entering a phase where capital typically starts to exit safe assets and return to riskier asset classes. Bitcoin analyst Matthew Hyland recently shared a similar view on X: roughly 500–1,000 days after the Fed begins rate cuts, liquidity usually leaves money market funds and flows into asset markets.
The timeline supports this scenario, but the new yield dynamics are the key factor.
According to the latest weekly report from the Investment Company Institute (ICI), total assets in money market funds reached $7.791 trillion as of the week ending February 18, 2026. Of this, $6.405 trillion are in government funds, $1.242 trillion in prime funds, and $0.144 trillion in tax-exempt funds. This structure indicates demand remains concentrated near Treasury bonds and daily liquidity.
This cash is often considered “standby money”—a reserve that can flood into risk assets when the Fed shifts policy.
However, this isn’t an aimless flow. It’s productive, constrained by yields, regulations, and management objectives. Rising interest rates increase yields, prompting money to seek safer havens. Now, with rates falling, the question isn’t about scale but about the direction of flow.
The effective federal funds rate is currently at 3.64% (January 2026), down from 4.22% in September 2025. This narrowing of yields alters the profitability of “safe” assets.
Crane’s money market yield index for the week ending January 2, 2026, was around 3.58%—a lower yield, reducing the gap between “waiting” and “risk-taking.” The chart shows cash holdings remain high, but the underlying yield curve is flattening—and the slope is creating movement.
The liquidity mechanism that operated strongly in previous phases—the Fed’s overnight reverse repurchase agreement (ON RRP)—has nearly exhausted, standing at only $0.496 billion as of February 20, 2026. Therefore, the next liquidity story isn’t about technical factors but about portfolio allocation decisions.
Funds may stay put, extend bond maturities, shift into credit, flow into stocks, or even into crypto “rails.” Each path has different implications.
Money market funds don’t just hold one type of cash. ICI data shows $3.082 trillion held by retail investors and $4.709 trillion by institutions. Institutional cash is often used for payments, credit reserves, and operations—so its movement is much slower than market sentiment.
Just 1% of total assets shifting equals about $78 billion; 5% is $390 billion; 10% is $779 billion. This scale can cause significant volatility depending on where the money flows.
The key factor remains yields—variables following the Fed’s policy trajectory.
According to Morgan Stanley, money market yields closely track the Fed. When rates fall, yields compress, and investors start asking: “Are there more profitable options?” The answer depends on risk appetite and investment mandates.
Macro observers also monitor the Fed’s balance sheet (WALCL currently at $6.613 trillion) and the U.S. Treasury’s general account (TGA averaging around $912.7 billion). These are “pressure gauges” reflecting systemic liquidity conditions.
The flow path: bonds first, risk later, crypto as a narrow branch
During rate-cut cycles, the first choices are usually long-term bonds and credit. History shows investment-grade bonds tend to outperform cash from the point the Fed stops raising rates until the cuts end.
This is crucial for Bitcoin, as its value depends on marginal capital flows. If cash mainly shifts into bonds, risk appetite may be cautious. If investors skip bonds and go directly into risk assets, markets could see heightened volatility.
Stablecoins currently total $308 billion, with USDT accounting for $186 billion—serving as “on-chain cash” that expands with risk appetite and contracts when systemic tightening occurs.
Additionally, U.S.-based Bitcoin ETFs have become a new capital channel. Comparing an estimated $39 billion (0.5% of total money market assets) with the actual $61.3 billion ETF flows shows that even small shifts can have significant impacts.
Cautious Scenario: The Fed cuts slowly, inflation remains persistent. Capital outflows are modest—0–2% over 12 months ($0–156 billion), mainly into high-quality bonds. Bitcoin follows overall sentiment; “cash wall” remains mostly on paper.
Soft Landing Scenario: The Fed cuts faster, and cash yields continue to decline. Outflows reach 5–10% ($390–779 billion), allocated into bonds, stocks, and a small portion into crypto. Even 0.5% is enough to move prices significantly.
Recession Scenario: The Fed cuts amid economic downturn. Demand for cash rises, and money market fund assets could grow by 3–8% ($234–623 billion). Bitcoin could see sharp volatility, declining initially then recovering as supportive policies take effect.
IMF forecasts global growth at 3.3% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027—supporting the soft-landing scenario, though regional risks remain.
With the ON RRP near exhaustion, focus shifts to the structure of money funds, institutional constraints, and yield spreads between bonds, stocks, and alternatives.
To monitor this process, pay attention to:
Liquidity isn’t just a slogan. It’s a system of yields, mechanisms, and allocation drivers. The calendar can set expectations, but the real movement depends on yield differentials and portfolio decisions that turn enormous capital pools into actual flows.
Vương Tiễn
Related Articles