Quick comparison between PumpFun and Clanker: who do you favor more

Author: Poopman, IOSG researcher; Compilation: 0xjs@Golden Finance

1. Business Model

PumpFun: During the bonding curve, a 1% transaction fee + 2 SOLS is required to list on Raydium.

Clanker: Due to the absence of a bonding curve, a permanent 1% fee is charged from Uni v3 and the #LpFeesCut feature is used.

New upgrade: 0.4% of the fee will be returned to the issuance, providing more incentives for issuanceToken.

2. Total Revenue

PumpFun: Revenue of 3.63 billion US dollars within 10 months. Currently 55 times that of clanker.

Clanker: Revenue of 6-7 million dollars within 20 days. Due to some expenses being Token, the revenue has been exaggerated.

3, Token quantity rise (7 days)

PumpFun 4 million tokens, 日rise约 1.3%）

Clanker currently has 4768 Tokens, with a daily rise of about 12%

4. Top 3 Market Cap Tokens

PumpFun:

Pnut - $1.1 billion

GOAT - $8.38 billion

Chillguys - $490 million

Clanker:

Clanker - $83 million

LUM - $39 million

ANON - 33 million USD

Some key points:

Although Clanker has successfully attracted a large volume on Base, it has not yet sent any positive signals to Farcaster.

Early BOT sniping seems to be an issue, but there is no clear/accurate data showing its toxicity.

The user base of Farcaster is limited, which may hinder the rise in Token quantity. However, this design can provide strategic value for both Base and Farcaster.

The increasingly diverse assets on Base are the key to unlocking the “true” Base Season.