2026-01-20 12:20:16

I recently read a news article where Russia's special envoy Dmitryyev publicly "expressed understanding" of the US interest in Greenland, even hinting that if Trump were to act on it, it would be a "historic moment." On the surface, it seems like Russia and the US are suddenly understanding each other, but digging deeper, it's clear—Russia would love to see the US stabbed in the back within NATO.

Why is Greenland so critical? Simply put, three words: strategic value.

**Resource Blockade**
Greenland's rare earth reserves include 43 key minerals worldwide, with neodymium and terbium being vital for chips, new energy batteries, and photovoltaics. Currently, China, the US, and Europe all need to import these resources. Whoever controls this land holds the throat of future industrial chains. This isn't just a commercial issue; it's a geopolitical high ground—the crypto market has always been highly sensitive to risks related to such strategic resources.

**The Shipping Route Contest Is the Real Game**
The melting Arctic ice has made navigation through the Arctic Ocean feasible. From Shanghai to Hamburg, traveling via the Arctic is 9 to 15 days faster than through the Suez Canal, and it can bypass pirates and regional unrest. Russia has already locked the Northeast Passage with nuclear-powered icebreakers. To break this control, Greenland becomes a must-contest territory. The accessibility of these routes in the short term will directly impact global trade costs and influence the pricing of commodities and safe-haven assets.

**Deep Strategic Military Play**
The US's Thule base in Greenland is a missile warning hub, and Russia has deployed heavy forces in the north in recent years. If the US forcibly annexes Greenland, the principle of NATO collective defense will collapse—Denmark has already warned that this would mean "the end of NATO." Why would Russia need to act directly? It can just watch the Western alliance split itself apart, creating space for action in Eastern Europe and the Arctic.

This game appears to be a geopolitical contest on the surface, but its deeper implications affect global resource flows, trade order, and the volatility of safe-haven assets. The crypto market has always been highly responsive to such macro variables.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityNinja

· 14h ago

If NATO really disbands, Greenland will be the real hot topic. Whoever gets the rare earth cake wins big. When shipping costs worsen, the trend of safe-haven assets in the crypto world directly trembles. Russia's move in this game is perfect; just watch the tigers fight while they sit back and profit. The West is fighting among itself. At the end of the day, it's all about resource competition. Control equals control of the future. The Arctic route is now blocked, and Greenland has truly become a hot commodity.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 14h ago

Russia really wants to sit back and watch the fight, if NATO truly falls apart over Greenland, that would be the ultimate.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 14h ago

Rare earths are really getting urgent, Greenland's move could blow up Once the Arctic route opens, the Suez Canal becomes useless, geopolitical factors directly impact asset flows Russia watches from the sidelines as NATO splits itself, this move is brilliant By the way, Bitcoin reacts fastest to such macro variables, keep a close eye on it Denmark: Our island, don't divide it... but no one is listening How does the crypto community view this? Do you really think it will impact the pricing of bulk commodities?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 14h ago

Russia's move is brilliant; just wait and see how the West collapses on its own. --- If Greenland's rare earths are truly controlled by the US, the chip and battery industry chain will be reshuffled directly. What does this mean for the crypto world? You decide. --- Opening the Arctic route is the key. With lower trade costs, the pricing of bulk commodities will need to be recalculated. --- NATO might really fall apart this time. If it does... safe-haven assets will undergo a major shake-up. --- In simple terms, it's a resource race of the new era. Previously fighting over oil, now fighting over rare earths. The logic remains the same. --- If the US truly takes over Greenland, opposition from Denmark alone would be enough to break the deadlock. Russia wouldn't even need to exert much effort. --- In this geopolitical game, ultimately, the retail traders bear the brunt. The crypto community should wake up. --- With rare earths, shipping routes, and military power all at play, whoever controls them can reshape the global order. --- Watching the Western internal conflicts from across the river, Russia's move really has some substance.

View OriginalReply0