On public blockchains, transaction details are like a transparent glass house; all on-chain activities are recorded and verifiable. This is indeed a concern for users who prioritize data privacy.
Is there a way to complete transactions while hiding transaction amounts and participant information? Dusk Network's solution is to utilize the Phoenix protocol and zero-knowledge proof technology to achieve selective privacy—your transaction data can be completely concealed, but when disclosure is needed to tax authorities or regulators, proof materials can also be generated. It's like wearing sunglasses while shopping—protecting privacy, yet able to present identity when necessary.
This mechanism is particularly suitable for institutional-level financial scenarios. Smart contracts can also execute in a privacy-preserving environment, keeping transaction logic confidential while allowing result verification. Against the backdrop of increasingly strict European MiCA regulations, this privacy-compliant and compliant technology approach is worth paying attention to.
As data breaches become more frequent, future financial infrastructure indeed needs such a privacy layer. What are your thoughts on on-chain privacy?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForMemes
· 18h ago
The so-called zero-knowledge proof sounds nice, but in reality, it's just to let us sneak around while passing censorship? That's a bit of a dream.
Privacy is indeed important, but can we really trust schemes like Dusk? It feels like self-deception.
After MiCA arrives, privacy is basically impossible; sooner or later, it will have to be exposed. Why bother with the fuss?
On-chain transparency isn't all bad; at least it can reveal who is rug pulling, making it more reliable than fake privacy.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 20h ago
Oh my god, finally someone is talking about this. Who can stand being exposed every day?
This zero-knowledge proof is truly amazing. It's incredible that privacy and compliance can coexist, but is Dusk really reliable? It all seems like an ideal scenario.
I trust institutions using this, but what about retail investors? Could the tax authorities end up using it as a sieve?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 20h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound great in theory, but can they really be implemented in practice? It always feels like just talk on paper.
Privacy and compliance are inherently at odds. Can Dusk really achieve both?
Transfers are all too transparent, which is really disgusting. Supporting privacy layers is a good move.
Can they pass the scrutiny of tax authorities? It seems like different countries have different attitudes.
Institutional players should have been using these already; retail investors are the ones being exposed.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 20h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly awesome; they don't reveal information and can pass audits. I love this kind of perfect balance.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 20h ago
Laughing out loud, finally someone wants to put curtains on this transparent glass house in the crypto world.
This zero-knowledge proof sounds pretty good, but I'm worried it will just become the next marketing buzzword for "revolutionary technology."
Institutions have been using mixers for a while, and now packaging it as the Phoenix protocol sounds much more advanced.
The key is whether it will be effective when it reaches tax authorities; the usefulness of the "proof of identity" documents still depends on policy attitudes.
But all in all, balancing privacy and compliance is a solid approach—this idea is definitely more reliable than some project teams' whitepapers.
On public blockchains, transaction details are like a transparent glass house; all on-chain activities are recorded and verifiable. This is indeed a concern for users who prioritize data privacy.
Is there a way to complete transactions while hiding transaction amounts and participant information? Dusk Network's solution is to utilize the Phoenix protocol and zero-knowledge proof technology to achieve selective privacy—your transaction data can be completely concealed, but when disclosure is needed to tax authorities or regulators, proof materials can also be generated. It's like wearing sunglasses while shopping—protecting privacy, yet able to present identity when necessary.
This mechanism is particularly suitable for institutional-level financial scenarios. Smart contracts can also execute in a privacy-preserving environment, keeping transaction logic confidential while allowing result verification. Against the backdrop of increasingly strict European MiCA regulations, this privacy-compliant and compliant technology approach is worth paying attention to.
As data breaches become more frequent, future financial infrastructure indeed needs such a privacy layer. What are your thoughts on on-chain privacy?