Alibaba is making aggressive moves in the quick commerce space, and the numbers show significant momentum. In fiscal 2026’s second quarter, Taobao Instant Commerce revenues climbed 60% year-over-year, fueled by strong order volumes and platform expansion. This performance has lifted monthly active users and bolstered customer management revenues through increased traffic and improved monetization.
However, there’s a catch. The rapid expansion comes at a steep cost. Alibaba has been transparent about its heavy investment in subsidies, logistics infrastructure, and user experience enhancements — all weighing down profitability. The China e-commerce segment saw EBITA plunge 76% year-over-year in the same period. Strip out quick commerce’s losses, and core China e-commerce EBITA would have shown mid-single-digit growth. This signals that quick commerce is currently the primary driver of margin compression.
The Cost Structure Problem
The operational pressure is unmistakable. Sales and marketing expenses surged to nearly 27% of revenues, reflecting the cutthroat competition in instant delivery and local commerce markets across China. Beyond that, cash flow generation has deteriorated notably, largely tied to sustained investments in quick commerce infrastructure.
Management expects volatility in adjusted EBITA over the coming quarters as competition remains fierce and investment stays elevated. With cost pressures likely to intensify, margin headwinds could persist longer than initially anticipated, suggesting this isn’t a short-term squeeze but a structural challenge.
Intensifying Competitive Battlefield
Alibaba isn’t alone in chasing quick commerce dominance. JD.com presents formidable competition through its self-operated, supply-chain-driven model that emphasizes quality control and faster delivery. In Q3 2025, JD.com delivered 14.9% revenue growth to RMB299.1 billion, supported by retail expansion and aggressive pricing — though higher logistics costs are pressuring its margins too.
PDD Holdings amplifies the competitive threat with a low-cost, social commerce approach. The platform’s emphasis on price efficiency, strong user engagement, and asset-light model has maintained profitability while scaling rapidly. Q3 2025 results showed solid revenue growth paired with strong net income gains, demonstrating how alternative models can thrive in the same market. PDD’s ability to maintain healthy margins while competing on price highlights the mounting pressure on Alibaba’s core platforms.
Valuation and Stock Performance
From a market perspective, BABA shares gained 37.5% over the past six months, outperforming the Internet Commerce industry (3.1% growth) and the Retail-Wholesale sector (6.4% growth). However, valuation metrics tell a more cautious story.
Currently trading at a forward 12-month P/E ratio of 20.04X versus the industry’s 24.97X, BABA appears relatively cheaper. But earnings estimates are deteriorating. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for fiscal 2026 earnings stands at $6.10 per share, down 5% over the past month and reflecting a 32.3% year-over-year decline.
With Alibaba carrying a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) rating, the combination of margin pressure from quick commerce investments, intense competition, and weakening earnings forecasts suggests investors should carefully weigh growth ambitions against near-term profitability challenges.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Alibaba's Quick Commerce Strategy: Weighing Growth Against Profitability Challenges
Alibaba is making aggressive moves in the quick commerce space, and the numbers show significant momentum. In fiscal 2026’s second quarter, Taobao Instant Commerce revenues climbed 60% year-over-year, fueled by strong order volumes and platform expansion. This performance has lifted monthly active users and bolstered customer management revenues through increased traffic and improved monetization.
However, there’s a catch. The rapid expansion comes at a steep cost. Alibaba has been transparent about its heavy investment in subsidies, logistics infrastructure, and user experience enhancements — all weighing down profitability. The China e-commerce segment saw EBITA plunge 76% year-over-year in the same period. Strip out quick commerce’s losses, and core China e-commerce EBITA would have shown mid-single-digit growth. This signals that quick commerce is currently the primary driver of margin compression.
The Cost Structure Problem
The operational pressure is unmistakable. Sales and marketing expenses surged to nearly 27% of revenues, reflecting the cutthroat competition in instant delivery and local commerce markets across China. Beyond that, cash flow generation has deteriorated notably, largely tied to sustained investments in quick commerce infrastructure.
Management expects volatility in adjusted EBITA over the coming quarters as competition remains fierce and investment stays elevated. With cost pressures likely to intensify, margin headwinds could persist longer than initially anticipated, suggesting this isn’t a short-term squeeze but a structural challenge.
Intensifying Competitive Battlefield
Alibaba isn’t alone in chasing quick commerce dominance. JD.com presents formidable competition through its self-operated, supply-chain-driven model that emphasizes quality control and faster delivery. In Q3 2025, JD.com delivered 14.9% revenue growth to RMB299.1 billion, supported by retail expansion and aggressive pricing — though higher logistics costs are pressuring its margins too.
PDD Holdings amplifies the competitive threat with a low-cost, social commerce approach. The platform’s emphasis on price efficiency, strong user engagement, and asset-light model has maintained profitability while scaling rapidly. Q3 2025 results showed solid revenue growth paired with strong net income gains, demonstrating how alternative models can thrive in the same market. PDD’s ability to maintain healthy margins while competing on price highlights the mounting pressure on Alibaba’s core platforms.
Valuation and Stock Performance
From a market perspective, BABA shares gained 37.5% over the past six months, outperforming the Internet Commerce industry (3.1% growth) and the Retail-Wholesale sector (6.4% growth). However, valuation metrics tell a more cautious story.
Currently trading at a forward 12-month P/E ratio of 20.04X versus the industry’s 24.97X, BABA appears relatively cheaper. But earnings estimates are deteriorating. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for fiscal 2026 earnings stands at $6.10 per share, down 5% over the past month and reflecting a 32.3% year-over-year decline.
With Alibaba carrying a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) rating, the combination of margin pressure from quick commerce investments, intense competition, and weakening earnings forecasts suggests investors should carefully weigh growth ambitions against near-term profitability challenges.