Where is blockchain really headed? In the past, everyone was competing on speed—how high TPS was and how fast confirmations could be. But now, the game has changed.
The true second half tests usability. No matter how fast your chain is, if no one uses it, it’s useless. That’s why privacy and compliance have become the new focus of competition.
Dusk’s approach is very clear: through privacy protection and compliance frameworks, enable blockchain to truly connect with real-world finance. It’s not for speculation, but to allow Web3 to support real business. RWA (Real World Assets), institutional-grade trading, various compliant financial products—these are not just slogans, but backed by truly usable technological foundations.
This is not a story of short-term explosive growth. It’s about how blockchain gradually integrates into the real economy, transforming from a niche tool into infrastructure. That’s the mark of maturity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocScientist
· 36m ago
Basically, it's about implementation. Speed alone is useless; a chain that no one uses is just trash.
Compliance should have been on the agenda long ago, and Dusk has indeed seen through this wave.
The TPS competition is outdated; now it's about whether we can truly integrate with real finance. That's where the next round of reshuffling will happen.
Everyone's talking about RWA every day, and finally someone has caught up with the technology.
Projects that work quietly are actually the most reliable. No explosive growth stories are fine; the long-term value is here.
From toys to infrastructure, this transition can't be completed in a year or two, but as long as the direction is right, that's enough.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 6h ago
That's right. In the past two years, the focus has shifted from boosting TPS to enhancing practicality. Compliance and privacy are the true moats, unlike the previous illusions.
I believe in Dusk's approach. RWA is indeed the future direction; institutional entry will rely on this.
True maturity is not about "what I can do" but about "how I implement it," which is what has prospects.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 6h ago
Really, the speed-focused approach should have been phased out long ago; now it's all about practical implementation.
Dusk's current strategy is quite pragmatic, but can RWA really take off?
Handling privacy and compliance simultaneously is no small feat.
They talk about integrating into the real economy every day, but how exactly is that done?
From speculation to infrastructure, it sounds easy but is difficult to actually implement.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 6h ago
Really, the previous TPS competition is already outdated. Now, whoever can truly get institutions to use it, wins.
I’ve thought about the privacy plus compliance logic, and it’s indeed the only way out; otherwise, regulation will always be the ceiling.
Dusk is quite interesting this time. No hype, no black, if the RWA route can really be laid out, that would be the true future of blockchain.
Wait, in that case, those purely speculative projects from before would be so awkward haha.
The mark of maturity is that no one talks about price fluctuations anymore, but instead discusses application scenarios. Quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 6h ago
It's true, increasing TPS to the sky is useless; a chain that no one uses is just scrap metal. Privacy compliance is the real bottleneck.
---
I understand Dusk's approach; they aim to build financial-grade infrastructure, not just hype.
---
RWA (Real-World Assets) is indeed quite interesting; finally, there's a team seriously working on practical applications.
---
Honestly, compared to those who shout TPS every day, I prefer those focusing on compliance. That's a long-term business.
---
Why does it seem like every chain now wants to work on "real assets," but only a few can actually land?
---
From speed competitions to compliance competitions, this shift is quite significant. The ecosystem needs to eliminate some players.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 6h ago
Honestly, most projects still hyping TPS at this point are probably not going anywhere.
RWA (Real-World Assets) is indeed a genuine demand, much more reliable than just speculating on coins.
Privacy + compliance is a powerful combo, but how many can truly implement it?
Integrating into the real economy? Sounds good, but I always feel like something's missing.
I like Dusk's approach; just don't let it turn into another PPT chain.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 6h ago
Finally, someone hit the nail on the head. TPS games have long become boring; now it's about who can truly implement it.
To be honest, most blockchains are just bragging. Dusk's compliant privacy combo truly hits the mark.
RWA is the future. Speculators should wake up.
Real infrastructure never needs to be hyped; it speaks for itself.
Where is blockchain really headed? In the past, everyone was competing on speed—how high TPS was and how fast confirmations could be. But now, the game has changed.
The true second half tests usability. No matter how fast your chain is, if no one uses it, it’s useless. That’s why privacy and compliance have become the new focus of competition.
Dusk’s approach is very clear: through privacy protection and compliance frameworks, enable blockchain to truly connect with real-world finance. It’s not for speculation, but to allow Web3 to support real business. RWA (Real World Assets), institutional-grade trading, various compliant financial products—these are not just slogans, but backed by truly usable technological foundations.
This is not a story of short-term explosive growth. It’s about how blockchain gradually integrates into the real economy, transforming from a niche tool into infrastructure. That’s the mark of maturity.