Remember early in this round of the market, expressions like "I'm coming in" were turned into market consensus. How many people followed this rhythm to enter the market, adding positions based on this reason? But now? One turn and they say, "Don’t nitpick, I might never mention it again."
What kind of logic is this? It feels like the institutions have finished eating, and retail investors are still at the trading table, only for them to suddenly turn hostile—you participating is wrong, and discussing these details should be met with scorn?
What we’re really after isn’t complicated; it’s not about getting someone to give a promise carved in stone. But the reality is right in front of us: in this round of the market, the "words" themselves are the most core liquid assets. They determine who can get on the bus and who gets left outside.
This isn’t just about trading strategies; frankly, it’s a moral issue.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LowCapGemHunter
· 15h ago
Bro, this is what you call the art of cutting leeks, changing at will
---
A typical pump-and-dump scheme: use the ladder to get in and kick out once done, truly brilliant
---
So, this circle has no sincerity, it's all just tricks
---
Just now it was "damn it’s coming," now the tone has changed? Laugh out loud, this is the reality of Web3
---
Is the term 'asset' or not? No, it should be said that the term is a sickle
---
So after institutions harvest, they just shift the blame to retail investors, really outrageous
---
Talking about moral issues is good, but who really cares
---
Rules can be changed at will, so how foolish are we to follow the trend
---
Falling out so quickly, no wonder people say there's no trust in the crypto world
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 15h ago
Laughing to death, it changes just like that, this is the crypto world.
---
Really can't understand, at first everyone was hyping it up, now they say we shouldn't believe it?
---
"Don't nitpick"?How so, only big players can make up stories, small investors can't believe stories?
---
Damn, rules are just meant to be played with, now we finally understand.
---
Institutions turn hostile after eating up, tired of this routine.
---
So in the end, it's still moral coercion, the same old trick.
---
They really think we're stupid, first use words to cut a wave, then say we misunderstood.
---
That's why I only deal with models and data, trusting charts is better than trusting people.
---
Wait, so did we believe a lie back then, or are they lying now?
---
Totally agree, rules themselves are just tools for harvesting.
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 15h ago
Those who followed the trend early on have all been cut now. Still want to argue? Hehe
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 16h ago
Forget it, that's just how it is. Big players eat the meat, retail investors drink the soup; the tricks are all the same.
Playful, why do the rules keep changing?
Remember early in this round of the market, expressions like "I'm coming in" were turned into market consensus. How many people followed this rhythm to enter the market, adding positions based on this reason? But now? One turn and they say, "Don’t nitpick, I might never mention it again."
What kind of logic is this? It feels like the institutions have finished eating, and retail investors are still at the trading table, only for them to suddenly turn hostile—you participating is wrong, and discussing these details should be met with scorn?
What we’re really after isn’t complicated; it’s not about getting someone to give a promise carved in stone. But the reality is right in front of us: in this round of the market, the "words" themselves are the most core liquid assets. They determine who can get on the bus and who gets left outside.
This isn’t just about trading strategies; frankly, it’s a moral issue.