2026-01-21 02:20:40

Looking at this coin's trend is quite interesting. It rose from 0.9 all the way to 1.4, and this upward cycle attracted a large amount of follow-up funds. However, the subsequent decline is worth analyzing—rapidly dropping to 0.7, then consolidating and oscillating at this price level, giving a sense of a rebound. But then it slowly declined to 0.6, with a very regular rhythm. Some analysts believe that this precise layering of prices actually reflects a game between large investors and institutions—initial rise is for accumulation, the sideways movement is for shakeout, and the final decline is for distribution. From a technical perspective, such trends are usually accompanied by a redistribution of liquidity—small retail investors often buy high during emotional swings and sell low. This cycle repeats itself and has become a common pattern for certain coins.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 25m ago

I've seen this trick before. Going from 0.9 to 1.4 is just a bait to accumulate shares; the real slaughter is just beginning.

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-21 02:49

It's the same old trick again, from 0.9 to 1.4 they suck the blood, then start shaking out the market. Retail investors are just being cut like leeks. Big players are really ruthless, controlling the market precisely like playing a game. We can only watch ourselves being harvested. This wave from 0.7 to 0.6, how many people still hoped for a rebound at 0.8? Now they're all trapped. Why is it always this pattern—accumulation, shaking out, distribution—cycling to death? Reallocating liquidity sounds nice, but it's actually just a synonym for big players offloading and retail investors taking the hit. Exactly, every time the market mood swings, retail investors buy high and sell low. Keep this up, and you'll really lose everything. It feels like many coins are played this way now. Institutions love this rhythm. What can we do about it?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-21 02:38

Typical market manipulation tactics: they drain blood from 0.9 to 1.4 and then start to cut losses. Meanwhile, we retail investors are still waiting for a rebound.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 01-21 02:37

It's the same old trick again, accumulating funds, shaking out weak hands, and then selling off. Retail investors always hit the right rhythm and walk right into the gunfire. --- When it hits 0.9 to 1.4, I should have sold, but I was greedy. Now I’ve cut my losses to 0.6, losing a lot. --- Basically, it's the institutions harvesting, and us small retail investors are just the grass in the leek field. --- This trend clearly looks manipulated. Who would believe such a neat rhythm? Feels like I’ve been played. --- Wait, according to this logic, is 0.6 the bottom? Or should I keep selling? Can anyone give a definite answer? --- It’s always like this. Very patient during declines, but as soon as a rebound starts, it surges and then crashes. So disgusting. --- Liquidity redistribution? Sounds like a reason to cut the leeks, just lack of money. --- During sideways trading, I really thought a rebound was coming, but it just slowly declined sideways, with such a perfect rhythm.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-21 02:32

It's the same old trick... accumulating funds, shaking out weak hands, and then dumping. No matter how fancy the words, it's still the same old story.

View OriginalReply0