Recent international political developments have been tumultuous. U.S. President Trump has made two major moves that have shocked the global stage, prompting many to wonder what his true intentions are.

Let's start with the first incident. Trump sent a letter to Norway, which was quite eye-opening. In the letter, he first claimed to "love peace," then immediately followed with a condition: if you don't award me the Nobel Peace Prize, I won't guarantee to continue pursuing a peaceful approach, and will have to consider "American interests." Even more outrageous, this was a private correspondence, yet he also copied multiple foreign diplomatic agencies. The brilliance of this move lies in turning personal complaints into a global announcement. International relations experts have recognized that this is no ordinary letter; its strong language directly hints at a "quasi-declaration of war," with a subtle focus on Europe. The implied message is: if you don't cooperate, the future of U.S.-Europe relations may face turbulence. Some commentators have criticized this as turning national diplomacy into a "transaction game," trivializing serious international politics into entertainment.

Now, onto the second move—the Greenland affair. The Trump administration has begun to eye this Arctic territory with keen interest. Officially, it claims to be "protecting" Greenland, but everyone knows what they really want.

These series of actions have stirred up the international situation and also affected financial markets. Safe-haven assets like gold and silver surged to new highs. Digital assets such as Bitcoin also experienced fluctuations. The market is raising the alarm: what does rising geopolitical risk mean? It's time to reassess asset allocations.