In the decentralized storage space on the Sui chain, one project has captured 90% of the market share on its own, which is quite rare. But this is not a marketing gimmick; it’s a real technological breakthrough.
The key lies in that RedStuff encoding scheme. How do other storage protocols in the Sui ecosystem handle it? Most are based on traditional RS erasure coding, which results in replication factors soaring to 15-20 times, making storage costs prohibitively high, and data retrieval taking over 1 second, completely stalling dynamic applications. In comparison, RedStuff uses XOR operations to reduce the replication factor to 4-5 times, cutting costs by 70%, and data read latency drops to milliseconds. This gap is not a minor optimization but a qualitative leap—no wonder 80% of dynamic applications in the Sui ecosystem choose this scheme, with developers voting with their feet.
Looking at the security design, some storage protocols lower their fault tolerance to cut costs. If more than 30% of nodes go offline, the data recovery success rate drops below 50%, which is essentially gambling on luck. RedStuff’s encoding is impressive because even if two-thirds of the slices are lost, it can still recover data 100%. This redundancy design is crucial for applications handling fund transfers, where data loss means direct financial loss, leaving no room for error.
Once the technical barrier is built, it’s hard to be overturned. The current leading position of this project is ultimately earned through hardcore engineering capabilities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamer
· 12h ago
To be honest, this is a typical case of "winning by competition." A 70% cost difference, millisecond-level latency, while others are still dragging things out with old solutions, this guy directly hits with a dimensionality reduction. Developers' foot votes never lie.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 12h ago
RedStuff's architecture really packs a punch; a 70% cost optimization is no joke, no wonder it can dominate such a large market share.
However, I'm concerned about how long this technology can hold up, what if someone develops a more aggressive coding solution.
By the way, the winner-take-all scenario in the Sui ecosystem is a bit risky; once the centralization risk is exposed, it's game over.
This security design is indeed impressive; losing two-thirds of the data can still be recovered, which is more conscientious than protocols that only pursue low cost.
It seems that's why some projects can't break through no matter how hard they try—once the technical gap is formed, it's very hard to catch up.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 12h ago
ngl, this RedStuff is really tough; cutting 70% of the costs, who can handle that?
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 12h ago
70% cost reduction, millisecond-level latency—this is true dominance. How can other protocols compare?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 12h ago
Wow, RedStuff's encoding scheme is truly amazing. It cuts 70% of the costs directly, with millisecond-level latency. This isn't just competition; it's a blow to the competition through dimensionality reduction.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 12h ago
Wow, cutting 70% of the costs, this gap isn't something that can be blown up by marketing... Technical dominance is just awesome.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12h ago
Damn, a 70% cost difference and still able to achieve millisecond-level reading. Isn't that crushing? No wonder everyone is using this solution; the technical difficulty is right there.
In the decentralized storage space on the Sui chain, one project has captured 90% of the market share on its own, which is quite rare. But this is not a marketing gimmick; it’s a real technological breakthrough.
The key lies in that RedStuff encoding scheme. How do other storage protocols in the Sui ecosystem handle it? Most are based on traditional RS erasure coding, which results in replication factors soaring to 15-20 times, making storage costs prohibitively high, and data retrieval taking over 1 second, completely stalling dynamic applications. In comparison, RedStuff uses XOR operations to reduce the replication factor to 4-5 times, cutting costs by 70%, and data read latency drops to milliseconds. This gap is not a minor optimization but a qualitative leap—no wonder 80% of dynamic applications in the Sui ecosystem choose this scheme, with developers voting with their feet.
Looking at the security design, some storage protocols lower their fault tolerance to cut costs. If more than 30% of nodes go offline, the data recovery success rate drops below 50%, which is essentially gambling on luck. RedStuff’s encoding is impressive because even if two-thirds of the slices are lost, it can still recover data 100%. This redundancy design is crucial for applications handling fund transfers, where data loss means direct financial loss, leaving no room for error.
Once the technical barrier is built, it’s hard to be overturned. The current leading position of this project is ultimately earned through hardcore engineering capabilities.