2026-01-21 07:24:13

The competition in the storage track has long entered a heated stage, but Walrus has taken a different approach. Unlike other storage protocols that stick to their own territory, Walrus boldly combines storage and DeFi, with the two tracks complementing each other. This integrated approach indeed opens up new imaginative space for the industry.

The brilliance of this combination lies in a positive ecological cycle: storage demand drives the value of the WAL token, and DeFi governance in turn nourishes the storage network. It sounds a bit complicated, but upon closer inspection, it’s quite straightforward.

Developers and institutional users need to store data, and they pay transaction fees using WAL tokens. This money doesn’t disappear into thin air; part of it goes to node operators as rewards, while the rest enters DeFi staking pools to share dividends with stakers. The more storage demand there is, the more WAL tokens are burned. As tokens become scarcer, their price naturally surges. When the price rises, more people want to stake WAL to become nodes and participate in network maintenance. More nodes mean a more secure and stable storage network, which can attract more users to store data — creating a complete cycle.

Another clever aspect is governance. WAL holders can earn dividends from staking and also have voting rights. Want to adjust storage fees? Vote. Want to change node incentive policies? Vote. How to develop the technical route? Still decided by voting. This turns into a true "storage as governance" model — token holders become co-builders of the ecosystem rather than mere spectators, with interests tied together. Naturally, they are more willing to contribute to the long-term development of the ecosystem.

WAL-4,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockImposter

· 14h ago

Storage + DeFi is truly awesome; this is the real ecosystem self-sufficiency, unlike some projects that just shout slogans.

View OriginalReply0

MetamaskMechanic

· 01-21 07:54

This integration idea is indeed brilliant. The combination of storage + DeFi makes for an interesting play. --- Honestly, the storage track has long needed someone to do it this way. Why did it take Walrus to come up with this? --- Token deflation + governance rights binding. I understand this logic; it's just a gamble on whether the subsequent ecosystem can really take off. --- Staking dividends + voting rights. Sounds good, but in reality, only a few major players will always be able to participate in governance. --- Can storage demand really drive up the value of WAL, or is this just another wave of hype? --- The positive cycle theoretically has no problem, but the key is when this cycle can sustain itself.

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 01-21 07:54

honestly the deflationary mechanism here reads solid on paper, but validator attrition under bear markets tho... that's where it gets messy. who's actually running nodes when yields crater?

Reply0

PuzzledScholar

· 01-21 07:53

Staking + DeFi combo确实挺有趣的，不过还是得看能不能长期跑通啊 --- WAL的这套逻辑听起来挺完美，但实际落地中会不会又是另一回事呢 --- Governance voting听起来民主，但真正能参与决策的还不是那些大户... --- 节点越来越多就一定更安全？这个逻辑我得打个问号 --- 有点好奇这个循环什么时候会破裂，存储需求没起来呢 --- 所以说白了还是得有真实需求撑，否则代币热度一过也是得凉凉 --- 咦这思路和Filecoin有啥本质区别吗，融合DeFi就能碾压？

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 01-21 07:45

I calculated the tokenomics model of WAL, and this cycle is indeed much more aggressive than other storage protocols. --- I've seen quite a few ideas combining storage and DeFi, but Walrus really ties the interests tightly, gotta admit there's something there. --- Wait, can this token burning logic really work? It still depends on whether the actual storage demand can keep up. --- The most intense part is governance—token holders directly participate in decision-making, unlike some protocols that are just for show. --- Basically, it makes every token holder a stakeholder, which definitely helps attract popularity. --- Relying on increasing the number of nodes to ensure storage network security? That logic has flaws. --- If you ask me, Walrus is taking this route because they've seen through it; simply selling storage space has no imagination.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-21 07:42

Oh wow, this logic really has some substance. The combination of storage and DeFi is truly unexpected. --- The more WAL is burned, the more scarce the price becomes. This flywheel effect is indeed amazing. --- The key is that it can also enable voting decisions. This is true community governance, unlike some projects that lose momentum after a slogan. --- The security of the storage network is increasing, so users are willing to use it. This positive cycle is quite intense. --- Staking dividends + voting rights make token holders feel like they’ve shifted from being just investors to active participants. Not bad. --- Why does it sound so perfect? Will it actually work in reality? I'm worried this model can't withstand the test. --- The phrase "storage as governance" sounds nice, but I worry that the DeFi part might not be able to handle the demand pressure from the storage network. --- It seems Walrus's idea is to forcibly combine the advantages of two tracks. Creative, but not without significant risks. --- Burning tokens to maintain scarcity—this move is quite slick. But if the price rises too quickly, it could easily crash.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-21 07:38

Damn, the idea of Walrus is really brilliant. I never thought of combining storage and DeFi. --- So basically, the more tokens are burned, the higher the price, and the more nodes there are? This cycle is a bit too perfect; I wonder where it might break. --- I love the concept of "Storage as Governance." Finally, it's not just some empty talk. --- Wait, can it really run? It feels like the real test is still ahead. --- Staking dividends + voting rights—binding them like this definitely makes people care more about the ecosystem, much more reliable than those air projects. --- How storage and DeFi are so seamlessly integrated—why didn't other projects think of this... --- Sounds good in theory, but what if no one comes to store data? If tokens can't be burned, isn't that still a problem? --- I finally get it. This is using economic incentives to let the ecosystem evolve on its own. There's something there. --- Voting rights are crucial; otherwise, it just becomes another centralized system. --- Whether it can run stably depends on real demand. Just having a model design isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0