Currently discussing public chains, everyone seems to be caught in the same template: explosive performance parameters, scorching ecosystem popularity, and data curves rising straight upward. As soon as the growth slows slightly, public opinion immediately labels it as "no hype, no story, no future."
Recently, I took a deep look at the Vanar Chain project, which changed my perspective. This chain might be one of the few that actively breaks out of this rhythm.
My first impression is not that it stacks data extravagantly, but that it has a very clear understanding of its positioning. Vanar Chain does not attempt to please all developers at once, support all hot tracks, or meet everyone's expectations. Instead, it focuses its efforts on content-based applications, entertainment interactions, and genuine user experience. In the short term, this approach may be at a disadvantage, and the market may not be very receptive. But in the long run, this is precisely the key— a chain that truly serves users is not constrained by how high TPS numbers are, but by whether its performance remains stable, whether network latency is low enough, whether user costs are acceptable, and most importantly, whether developers are willing to build on it long-term.
In terms of ecosystem development, Vanar’s approach also appears more cautious. It doesn’t spend large sums on aggressive hype, but instead focuses on refining foundational tools, development environments, and infrastructure. The obvious benefit of this approach is that the projects that remain are mostly not short-term players chasing subsidies, but builders who genuinely want to take root in this ecosystem. The downside? Early on, the data naturally isn’t flashy enough and isn’t easily swept up by hot money.
But on the other hand, the true value of a public chain often accumulates gradually when no one is paying attention. When a specific niche scenario finally takes off, user numbers grow, and the application ecosystem naturally prospers, the outside world will suddenly realize that this chain has been ready all along. That growth then becomes real growth, not inflated by incentives. This steady, cautious route may not be the most clever narrative for fundraising, but for the long-term health of the ecosystem, it might be more valuable than short-term hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DevChive
· 7h ago
Right now, everyone wants to impress with data, but Vanar's move is quite clear-headed.
---
Honestly, how much courage does it take to boost popularity without spending money?
---
In the short term, there will definitely be hits, but this might be the way to last the longest.
---
Feels like describing a "boring chain"? The problem is, who would use a chain like this?
---
Refining the underlying layer sounds easy, but I'm just worried no one will come in the end.
---
Anyway, I've heard this set of theories quite a few times, and you tell me how it ended up.
---
I still believe in this slow approach, just a bit tired of waiting.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 21h ago
Wake up, another storyteller. Can Vanar really hold up until that day?
---
I believe Vanar won't spend money recklessly, but the problem is hot money can't wait that long.
---
It sounds good, but it's just a project without data support.
---
Finally, someone dares to say the term "virtual inflation." Other public chains, listen up?
---
A steady approach sounds good, but bankruptcy can happen quietly too.
---
I just want to know how much TVL Vanar has now. Stop with these philosophical discussions.
---
Wait until the ecosystem prospers, and by then, the coin price might have already cooled off.
---
I can flip this logic and apply it to other ten chains. Who can guarantee they're not just storytelling?
---
I've read it carefully, yes, but that's Web3 — fast fish eat slow fish.
---
It's rare to find a project that doesn't deceive, but unfortunately, the market's rejection makes that very realistic.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 21h ago
To be honest, I've heard this set of arguments too many times. Every time, it's about being stable and long-term. But what’s the result? The crypto world is like that; no matter how good the story is, it has to be backed by data.
Vanar is now so low-key. Can it really hold out until that "niche scenario is successful"? I'm afraid it might be drowned out by new hot topics before that.
But on the other hand, after getting tired of those chains that boast parameters and launch after throwing subsidies, I'm actually curious about how far Vanar's slow and meticulous approach can go. Maybe this is a long-term bet.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 21h ago
This logic is good, but can Vanar really hold up until that day?
There are many chains calmly doing infrastructure, but in the end? They are all gone.
Speaking of which, not spending money indeed reduces that kind of虚胖感, but the problem is, who is waiting for the developers?
I agree with this point of view. Compared to those chains that water down their data, it's better to be more solid.
Vanar's approach is indeed a bit different, let's see how they tell the story moving forward.
It's nice to call it "taking root," but honestly, it's just a lack of popularity, and that's a big difference.
I feel this kind of approach is more reliable, but whether the market accepts it is another matter.
Long-termism always sounds right, but when is "long-term"? No one can wait too long.
Currently discussing public chains, everyone seems to be caught in the same template: explosive performance parameters, scorching ecosystem popularity, and data curves rising straight upward. As soon as the growth slows slightly, public opinion immediately labels it as "no hype, no story, no future."
Recently, I took a deep look at the Vanar Chain project, which changed my perspective. This chain might be one of the few that actively breaks out of this rhythm.
My first impression is not that it stacks data extravagantly, but that it has a very clear understanding of its positioning. Vanar Chain does not attempt to please all developers at once, support all hot tracks, or meet everyone's expectations. Instead, it focuses its efforts on content-based applications, entertainment interactions, and genuine user experience. In the short term, this approach may be at a disadvantage, and the market may not be very receptive. But in the long run, this is precisely the key— a chain that truly serves users is not constrained by how high TPS numbers are, but by whether its performance remains stable, whether network latency is low enough, whether user costs are acceptable, and most importantly, whether developers are willing to build on it long-term.
In terms of ecosystem development, Vanar’s approach also appears more cautious. It doesn’t spend large sums on aggressive hype, but instead focuses on refining foundational tools, development environments, and infrastructure. The obvious benefit of this approach is that the projects that remain are mostly not short-term players chasing subsidies, but builders who genuinely want to take root in this ecosystem. The downside? Early on, the data naturally isn’t flashy enough and isn’t easily swept up by hot money.
But on the other hand, the true value of a public chain often accumulates gradually when no one is paying attention. When a specific niche scenario finally takes off, user numbers grow, and the application ecosystem naturally prospers, the outside world will suddenly realize that this chain has been ready all along. That growth then becomes real growth, not inflated by incentives. This steady, cautious route may not be the most clever narrative for fundraising, but for the long-term health of the ecosystem, it might be more valuable than short-term hype.