2026-01-21 07:24:33

There is a project called Dusk, and its initial concept was quite different — it didn't aim to overthrow financial rules, but rather to encode them into code.

Since building its Layer 1 in 2018, the entire design has revolved around three core principles: compliance, privacy, and auditability. This might sound a bit rigid, but there are interesting details within.

In Dusk's architecture, zero-knowledge proofs are not just simple privacy tools; they are used to prove compliance without revealing specific information — essentially a "compliance proof layer." Auditability was not an afterthought but was directly integrated into the protocol. Its modular design allows RWA, securities assets, and institutional-level DeFi to develop independently within the same secure framework.

The logic behind this approach is clear: Dusk's value isn't about short-term market movements but whether it can serve as the foundational infrastructure for real assets to be on-chain. This positioning determines how it will develop.

DUSK10%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightSnapHunter

· 9h ago

Compliance written into the code, this approach is indeed clear-headed... Much more reliable than those who shout about revolution every day. Actually, it's just about doing institutional work, don't expect it to follow iykwim. Zero-knowledge proofs as a compliance tool? That's an interesting idea. Market trends are really not important; the key is whether we can survive until RWA truly starts to grow. Audits embedded in the protocol... Those who honestly do infrastructure are the real winners. I like this approach, just worried about being overlooked by the market. Long-term players, no matter how short-term it is, can't copy this kind of strategy.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 11h ago

Turning compliance into code? That idea is truly brilliant. Not following the trend is the way to win. --- Zero-knowledge proofs as compliance tools—I've really never thought of that. There's some real substance here. --- It's still RWA, DeFi, and institutional-grade setups, but this time it genuinely doesn't feel like a typical rug pull. --- Incorporating rules isn't just working for regulators, but on the other hand, it doesn't seem to have any downsides. --- Now that's a project with real ideas, not just blowing hot air about infrastructure. --- Wait, can it really become a standard? Or is it just another hype? --- Compliance, privacy, and auditability—sounds like a tailored solution for big institutions. Maybe there's real potential here.

View OriginalReply0

CompoundPersonality

· 11h ago

This approach is indeed clear-headed. Instead of following the trend and hyping concepts, focus on practical applications. Incorporating compliance into the code—this is what institutions dare to use. Zero-knowledge proofs are used to prove rule adherence? Interesting, since the rules themselves are transparent. In the long run, this set of tools will have value; short-term market fluctuations really don't matter. RWA on-chain will eventually require this kind of technology. It's not too late to position now. Wait, how is this project's funding situation? Can it survive until that day? Compliance, privacy, and auditability combined—building the ecosystem afterward is the real challenge. Sounds good, but the key is whether institutions will buy into it. This is the right attitude, rather than shouting about disrupting finance every day. Balancing privacy and compliance is not easy to navigate.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 11h ago

Hey wait, the concept of the compliance proof layer seems to have some substance This is the true infrastructure approach, not hype Dusk has codified the rules, and it feels like their path is indeed different from others Compliance + privacy + auditability, at first glance it seems ordinary, but only when you use it do you understand why it’s designed this way Will institutions adopt this? That’s the real question Honestly, I don’t quite understand how zero-knowledge proofs can demonstrate compliance The modular framework indeed solves many pain points In the short term, no one cares, but if RWA really takes off, Dusk could become valuable I get the logic, just not sure if the team is reliable

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 12h ago

theoretically speaking, if we map dusk's zk-compliance layer onto a recursive snark architecture... this is actually genius. they're not building hype, they're building plumbing for institutional onboarding. most l1s are still playing checkers while dusk's playing multidimensional bridge optimization.

Reply0