2026-01-21 07:25:22

The narrative of RWA is actually stuck in a vicious cycle: everyone is discussing "bringing real assets on-chain," but few are asking the next question—what interface will users operate on, what approval processes will they go through, and where will the data come from.

Recently, after viewing a preview of a transaction product from a leading L1 public chain, I realized that for RWA to truly land, it must fully imitate the logic of brokerage apps. The preview page directly displayed the product prototype: Portfolio NAV, KYC verification, Network tagging, and it also listed traditional investment targets like funds, ETFs, and money market funds. This is not the usual DeFi "liquidity pool" approach, but rather moving "compliant account opening" onto the chain.

The key is that the regulatory framework behind it has already been laid out. The official announced details of cooperation with a licensed MTF trading venue in the Netherlands—not just some exchange hyping itself, but truly integrated into a regulated market structure. Even more interestingly, both parties plan to tokenize and bring onto the chain approximately €300 million in assets, which indicates that compliance approval, risk control, and clearing are already underway.

The technology stack uses Chainlink’s cross-chain communication, data chain, and market data flow solutions, standardizing "cross-chain settlement of compliant securities" and "exchange-level data on-chain." The MTF trading venue has already facilitated over €200 million in financing for more than 100 small and medium-sized enterprises, connecting over 17,500 active investors—this is the real distribution channel through which RWA can generate network effects.

In simple terms, the power of this model lies in: it’s not reinventing the financial wheel, but rather moving existing regulatory systems, investor networks, and risk control processes onto the chain. It has upgraded from mere "asset tokenization" to a "compliant investment ecosystem."

LINK2,55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DarkPoolWatcher

· 41m ago

Oh wow, finally someone has explained this clearly. Everyone was talking about the dream of "asset on-chain" before, but it was just talk. Now that I see the real process, I understand—this thing is fundamentally inseparable from the brokerage firm's system. Is the compliance framework really well established? That definitely makes a difference. But the question is, will any institution really be willing to move assets worth hundreds of millions of euros onto the chain... Speaking of which, Chainlink's move is quite bold. With a volume of 300 million euros, this is no longer just a virtual asset in the demo stage; it indicates that document approval and risk control are in progress. Quite interesting. The last point is the most critical—it's not about inventing a new wheel, but about bringing the old wheel onto the chain. This logic is actually the only way RWA can survive; everything else is just air.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysAnon

· 14h ago

Finally, someone has broken this barrier—RWA is just moving brokerages onto the chain, not a revolutionary innovation.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 14h ago

Finally, someone has explained this clearly. The previous discussions about "asset on-chain" were really empty talk. The compliant ecosystem is basically just copying the entire traditional financial system; technology is just a tool. €300 million landing, now that's real progress, not just empty promises.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 14h ago

Someone finally explained this thoroughly. Previously, everyone was just fantasizing about tokenization without considering how ordinary users would use it. RWA just needs to copy the brokerage model; all these liquidity pools are nonsense. In the end, it's still about KYC, risk control, and the whole set of procedures. The 300 million euros in assets are already undergoing approval. This time it's not hype; someone is actually doing it. Chainlink's approach to standardizing data streams is indeed brilliant. Moving exchange-level infrastructure onto the chain isn't as difficult as it seems. The network of 17,500 investors is the key. Without this distribution channel, RWA is just a castle in the air. A compliance system + investor network + on-chain settlement—this combination has real potential. Finally, it's not just another smart contract fantasy. Real financial infrastructure going on-chain—that's the way forward.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 14h ago

Finally, someone has thought this through. I'm really tired of the previous arguments about "asset onboarding." The figure of 300 million euros is the real focus, indicating that this is not just empty talk. To be honest, the way forward for RWA is to completely bid farewell to the wild growth approach of DeFi. This logic is essentially about bringing brokerages onto the blockchain, but this is actually the right direction. KYC, risk control, and clearing processes should all be implemented; compliance is the real moat. Chainlink's cross-chain solution can standardize transactions, which indeed requires high technical expertise. The network effect of 17,500 active investors is more convincing than anything else. But to be fair, will a well-established regulatory framework truly accelerate the implementation of RWA? It still depends on whether subsequent projects can really bring the funds together.

View OriginalReply0

FrontRunFighter

· 14h ago

so they're finally admitting rwa needs the boring compliance stuff... not just "ooh blockchain magic" lmao. the whole kyc + regulated exchange play is basically admitting defi failed at this job, no shot around it

Reply0