The infrastructure issues of digital finance are becoming increasingly prominent. Currently, the trading volume of stablecoins is measured in trillions of dollars, but existing blockchain networks either incur high costs or require multiple cross-chain bridges when handling such high-frequency small transactions, leading to a user experience far from ideal.



This is precisely the core problem Plasma aims to solve — it is not just another general-purpose public chain, but the first layer blockchain designed from scratch specifically for stablecoins. The design philosophy is straightforward: eliminate those functional modules that are useless for stablecoin transfers, and instead optimize for stablecoin issuance, rapid circulation, and cross-chain interaction.

Supporting this chain is the XPL token. It serves both as a security guarantee for the network and grants holders participation rights in the entire ecosystem governance. Simply put, this system makes the fee for each stablecoin transfer nearly zero, with confirmation speeds reaching the second level, and can seamlessly connect with mainstream networks like Ethereum and Solana.

From practical applications, such infrastructure has considerable potential. International remittance channels can significantly reduce costs, DeFi protocols can access more efficient liquidity layers, and tokenization of real-world assets has a more suitable platform. Cross-border trade settlements can be directly completed with stablecoins. In essence, this approach uses a dedicated chain to address the pain points of stablecoins in specific scenarios.

Stablecoins play a role in the digital economy similar to the US dollar in traditional finance — serving as a liquidity foundation. What Plasma aims to do is build a dedicated, efficient "artery" for this "vascular system." As more value flows seek optimal routes, tailored pathways will naturally become the preferred choice. This may very well be what Plasma aspires to — the indispensable foundational chain within the stablecoin ecosystem.
XPL3,07%
ETH0,78%
SOL2,12%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMaskedRidervip
· 8h ago
I've seen the cut function too many times, and in the end, it all becomes useless. Zero-fee instant confirmation sounds great, but how does it actually perform in practice? What makes XPL confident that its security mechanism won't collapse? Is it faith?
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoyvip
· 11h ago
The idea of a dedicated chain is good, but with the highly competitive stablecoin track, what makes Plasma stand out?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhangvip
· 12h ago
Zero-cost transfers? Instant confirmation? I've heard this pitch too many times. How many actually manage to implement it... But the idea of a dedicated chain is actually practical, better than another clone public chain. The key is whether XPL can sustain itself; right now, everyone dares to claim they have a stablecoin infrastructure... Large international remittances are indeed a pain point, but what about the risks of cross-chain bridging? It actually increases complexity, I think. While stablecoins do lack good infrastructure, why would Plasma necessarily be the "artery"? Ecosystem cold start is a hard flaw. Honestly, if it really could achieve zero fees and instant confirmation, this would be a big deal. DeFi liquidity would be completely reshaped.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCatvip
· 12h ago
The idea of a dedicated chain is good, but how many can truly survive? --- Zero fees? Instant confirmation? I feel like I've heard that before... --- Once again tailored for stablecoins. I've heard this narrative several times. --- I can't see any real demand for the XPL token. Tokens that are purely governance rights usually don't perform well. --- Regarding the reduction of international remittance costs, how are Stellar and Ripple doing? --- The so-called "artery" of the stablecoin ecosystem sounds nice, but it really depends on whether it can attract major clients to migrate over. --- It seems like this is just looking for a "better solution" for stablecoins. In reality, there are only a few tokens, and there are too many protocols that can be used.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMinervip
· 12h ago
Trillions of dollars in stablecoin liquidity, but the actual fund routing has long been locked by the internal team... Plasma claims zero fees, but is there really no hidden withdrawal mechanism on the contract side?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)