The topic of RWA (Real World Assets) has been widely discussed in the community, but frankly, most projects are stuck in the same vicious cycle: wanting compliance means exposing all data, while protecting privacy makes regulatory approval difficult. Traditional financial institutions are watching blockchain technology closely but are also sticking to the principle of "data confidentiality first," making them hesitant to truly jump in.
Tokenization of real-world assets sounds simple, but the actual operation is much more complex than just issuing an NFT. Taking the example of bringing securities worth 300 million euros onto the chain, issuers worry about competitors arbitraging transaction details or sensitive information being leaked, while regulators require every transaction to be traceable and auditable. These two demands are often contradictory, like two natural enemies.
The truly interesting solutions come from the application of zero-knowledge proofs. Without revealing specific transaction amounts or participant identities, they can prove to regulators that the transaction fully complies with regulations—like a metaphor: you pass an exam, and the teacher knows your score but doesn't need to see how you solved each question. This "precise fuzziness" perfectly meets the dual needs of institutional investors who want to protect trade secrets but must also comply with regulations.
What is most worth paying attention to is not just promises on paper but real projects in practice. The Dutch stock exchange NPEX has tokenized securities worth 300 million euros on the blockchain, using zero-knowledge proof technology to handle custody and transaction privacy issues, while fully complying with the EU MiCA regulatory framework. It is well known that doing financial compliance in Europe is challenging, and successfully implementing such a project under strict regulation proves that this is not just a theoretical technical solution but a feasible path tested in real-world scenarios.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFund
· 5h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are finally being used by someone, not just talk. NPEX's move this time can be considered a breakthrough; being compliant and private at the same time is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; they allow you to pass exams and hide your scores. Love it.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomad
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proof is truly brilliant; finally, someone has reconciled the pair of rivals, privacy and compliance.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proof is truly a brilliant move, ensuring privacy while passing approval, perfectly hiding and seeking.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed quite interesting; finally, someone has solved the difficult problem of RWA.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proof is truly brilliant; it can both fool regulators and keep secrets, perfect.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 14h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly brilliant; they can reassure banking giants without revealing their secrets.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 14h ago
The zero-knowledge proof trick is truly brilliant; finally, someone has cracked this dilemma. The NPEX case is indeed worth paying attention to.
The topic of RWA (Real World Assets) has been widely discussed in the community, but frankly, most projects are stuck in the same vicious cycle: wanting compliance means exposing all data, while protecting privacy makes regulatory approval difficult. Traditional financial institutions are watching blockchain technology closely but are also sticking to the principle of "data confidentiality first," making them hesitant to truly jump in.
Tokenization of real-world assets sounds simple, but the actual operation is much more complex than just issuing an NFT. Taking the example of bringing securities worth 300 million euros onto the chain, issuers worry about competitors arbitraging transaction details or sensitive information being leaked, while regulators require every transaction to be traceable and auditable. These two demands are often contradictory, like two natural enemies.
The truly interesting solutions come from the application of zero-knowledge proofs. Without revealing specific transaction amounts or participant identities, they can prove to regulators that the transaction fully complies with regulations—like a metaphor: you pass an exam, and the teacher knows your score but doesn't need to see how you solved each question. This "precise fuzziness" perfectly meets the dual needs of institutional investors who want to protect trade secrets but must also comply with regulations.
What is most worth paying attention to is not just promises on paper but real projects in practice. The Dutch stock exchange NPEX has tokenized securities worth 300 million euros on the blockchain, using zero-knowledge proof technology to handle custody and transaction privacy issues, while fully complying with the EU MiCA regulatory framework. It is well known that doing financial compliance in Europe is challenging, and successfully implementing such a project under strict regulation proves that this is not just a theoretical technical solution but a feasible path tested in real-world scenarios.