2026-01-21 08:25:00

The true difference in trading ability lies in whether you dare to go against the majority's choices.

When the bull market sentiment is high, we reduce our positions; when the market is collectively panicking, our data models are flashing signals of "chip absorption." This is not contrarian behavior for its own sake, but supported by a systematic framework.

Our team of three members each have their own roles: one tracks the real movements of smart money on the chain; another quantifies changes in the market greed and fear indices; I am responsible for consolidating information from all dimensions and making those counterintuitive but high-probability decisions at critical points.

Take last month's large floating profit in BTC as an example—market sentiment was very poor, but the on-chain chip flow told us things weren't that bad. We set up our positions at key support levels. Retail investors saw risk, but our system calculated opportunity.

So don’t ask me if I have a gut feeling. I don’t. I only have cross-validated data from multiple dimensions and a cold rationality that trusts only probabilities. Profits in this market are often hidden on the opposite side of consensus.

BTC1,68%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainSherlockGirl

· 01-21 08:54

Based on my analysis, this set of logic is actually just packaging gambling as a systematic argument, which sounds quite sophisticated... Wait, are there really that many dimensional data that can accurately capture the "key support levels"? I always feel like this is just a post-hoc storytelling approach. A three-person team sounds good, but who will verify their model itself? To be continued... --- Flickering signals, high odds decision-making... Basically, it's a probability game. Why bother to package it as so esoteric? If it really makes money, there's no need to tell stories on social platforms. --- On-chain chip flow is indeed worth watching, but how can this guy be sure that what he's seeing is smart money and not big players cutting leeks? --- Bull market reduction, panic layout... sounds great, but this logic could explain any rebound last year. --- Risk warning: I actually don't see anything new, just reverse operations plus data packaging. --- Multi-dimensional cross-validation sounds good, but is it possible that multiple data points are actually just fooling you at the same time?

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost