Recently, investors successfully closed their DUSK perpetual contract positions with a return of 126%. Regarding this project, the market has mixed opinions—some say to chase high during a rally, while others call for cutting losses during a dip, but this often stems from a lack of understanding of its underlying mechanism.



The reason DUSK is worth paying attention to lies in its technical architecture as an L1 native chain when handling RWA (Real-World Asset Tokenization). Unlike common L2 scaling solutions, it offers instant finality without waiting for lengthy challenge periods. This feature is especially critical in financial scenarios—transactions can be confirmed immediately, reducing risk.

Even more interesting is its ZK-Privacy technology stack. Financial institutions face a dilemma when handling sensitive transactions: privacy or compliance. DUSK, through the Citadel identity layer design, allows KYC verification to be hidden at the application layer, protecting user privacy while meeting regulatory requirements. In the context of the tightening regulations in 2025-2026, this technical solution hits the market's pain points precisely.

Even after closing high-position contracts for profit, the spot holdings are still maintained. Infrastructure tailored for financial tokenization still has long-term potential. Technology determines investment returns; blindly participating is just gambling—this is the difference between understanding and not understanding.
DUSK11,57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 10h ago
*checks historical precedent* ah yes, the classic "this time is different because of the tech stack" narrative. we've heard this one before in 2017, 2021... and somehow the chart always rhymes. 126% gains sound nice until you realize 80% of retail never actually books profits lmao
Reply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 10h ago
The contract ran at 126%, smart move. But this combination of RWA + privacy really works well, holding onto spot positions and waiting for institutional entry.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibesvip
· 10h ago
Hey, that 126% return rate is really impressive, but I'm more concerned about whether it can continue to sustain later on. The RWA track is indeed hot, but DUSK's combination of privacy + compliance... to be honest, I still can't see the progress of its implementation clearly, don't just talk about technical architecture. If you're still holding spot assets, then it's a long-term gamble. I need to see if there are any practical applications landing this year before I can say anything. Tightening compliance is a double-edged sword; some people benefit from the redemptions, while others get cut like chives. The key is whether the team really knows how to execute or just knows how to tell stories. For projects like this, I'm afraid that no matter how impressive they sound, if the traffic doesn't pick up, the ecosystem will remain cold.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancervip
· 10h ago
126% returns are a safe bet, a smart choice. But the story of DUSK is just beginning, and RWA is indeed the future direction. DUSK spot holdings are still in hand, and ZK privacy technology is exactly what institutions need. In an era of regulation, those who can handle both privacy and compliance will win. Unlike those who only shout signals, this guy understands technical architecture and knows what real-time finality is. The advantage of L1 handling RWA truly outperforms L2 by a mile. Perpetual cuts are also okay, but in the long run, the value of this infrastructure is underestimated. The technical logic is clear, and the only thing left is time.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 10h ago
Wait, can the Citadel identity layer really prevent reentrancy attacks? It seems there might be vulnerabilities in the interaction logic between the privacy layer and the KYC layer.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 10h ago
126% return now, saying this a bit late, isn't it... But DUSK's combination of ZK privacy + compliance is indeed top-notch. Still holding onto spot? Bold move.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuthvip
· 10h ago
Is a 126% return really achievable or just a story? Nowadays, every project dares to boast --- ZK-Privacy indeed has interesting aspects; few solutions can meet both privacy and compliance requirements simultaneously --- Sounds like you're hyping your spot holdings, haha --- L1 handling RWA has imagination, but whether it can be implemented is the key --- I understand that closing the contract and taking the profit is safe, but holding onto spot assets—are you truly confident or just trapped? --- The advantage of instant finality is indeed obvious compared to other chains, but the ecosystem is the decisive factor --- It's the same KYC privacy argument again; how regulators actually view it is still uncertain --- It's all lofty talk; the market still needs to fall, and good technology can't change market sentiment --- This project's technical framework is good, but I'm afraid it will become a textbook case—great project, poor performance --- Holding onto spot assets could mean anything—either you really believe in it or you're deeply trapped
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)