2026-01-21 10:20:50

#数字资产市场动态 Silver's current situation is quite interesting—at the 95.16 level, it is stuck above the 7-day moving average(92.65), and it seems the bulls are still exerting effort. However, the previous high of 96.00 is just around the corner, and it could break through if you're not careful, so short-term profit-taking will definitely be impulsive.

As for long-term strategies? Silver's industrial demand and precious metal safe-haven attributes are both present, making it truly worth paying attention to. If you're the type of investor who can hold steady, you might consider small positions and buy in batches, but the prerequisite is having the mental readiness—short-term volatility is unavoidable. $XAG this round, the key is whether it can hold above this moving average.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 16h ago

95.16 moving average, the bulls are still struggling to support, but it feels a bit weak this round.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 17h ago

95.16 is stuck above the moving average line, and this position is indeed a bit tense. The previous high at 96 is waiting right there.

View OriginalReply0

PerennialLeek

· 17h ago

Silver is indeed a bit stuck in this wave, with the $96 line tightening up a bit. Standing firm on the moving averages is the key, otherwise you'll just get shaken out again. In the long term, industrial demand is there, but the current short-term volatility really can't hold up, so it's better to find a stable rhythm. Small positions divided into batches are truly the only way to survive; otherwise, your mentality will break down very quickly. If you can't hold, don't touch it. This market is all about who has a stronger mental resilience.

View OriginalReply0