When it comes to the integration of blockchain and traditional finance, there's an old problem that has yet to be solved—compliance is always the last thing to be considered.



Currently, most protocols follow a similar pattern: first, they develop flashy financial features with great effort, then they desperately patch on compliance measures. The result? It's like installing a security system on a sports car—heavy and awkward. By 2026, the limitations of this approach will become increasingly apparent.

To truly attract institutional users, a different approach is needed. Compliance cannot be optional; it must be embedded into the protocol's very DNA. DUSK is taking this route—avoiding post-hoc fixes and instead integrating compliance and privacy verification into the protocol from the start.

The key is that future financial applications will compete not based on who has more complex features, but on who can handle sensitive assets on a trustworthy foundation. DUSK leverages zero-knowledge proofs to create an interesting solution: on-chain operations can prove their legality and validity (such as correct transfer signatures), while maintaining privacy for observers, and simultaneously generating verifiable compliance proofs for regulators. Three birds with one stone.

By 2026, the advantages of this "intrinsic compliance" will explode at two levels: first, the asset issuance process will be completely simplified, eliminating the need for cumbersome legal structures and separate custodians; second, cross-border financial scenarios will see a significant boost in efficiency. This is the true paradigm shift.
DUSK5,32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 7h ago
Compliance has shifted from being a "post-event armchair strategist" to being "innate," and this approach is indeed different. The traditional method of digging a pit first and then plugging the leak should have been eliminated long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 7h ago
Compliance really needs to be considered from the design phase; patching it later is really a letdown.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 7h ago
Compliance has shifted from post-incident remediation to built-in at the genetic level; this approach is indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermitvip
· 7h ago
Current projects are really just patchwork solutions, piling on flashy features and then trying to fit them into compliance. This approach is just ridiculous. DUSK, which is built with compliance ingrained in its core, actually seems much more reliable and is indeed a different approach.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 7h ago
Another useless innovation. Theoretically, it should work. I'll try this smart trap first.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)