Bitcoin has been declining continuously under the impact of Trump’s tariff policy, but on-chain data reveals an interesting contradiction: although exchange inflows temporarily increased, this inflow did not persist, suggesting a lack of sustained structural selling pressure in the market. CryptoQuant analyst XWIN’s latest analysis uncovers the market psychology behind this— a tug-of-war between short-term economic risk avoidance and long-term allocation interests.
How Tariff Policies Have Become a Recent Downward Pressure on Bitcoin
According to the latest news, the Trump administration has once again advanced tariff policies, which have become a clear bearish factor for Bitcoin since 2025. This policy impact influences the market through a clear transmission chain:
Risk assets (including Bitcoin) become more susceptible to corrections
Data confirms this pressure. Currently, Bitcoin is priced at $89,067, down 2.42% in the past 24 hours, with a total decline of 6.21% over the past 7 days. This is not an isolated event; the overall market risk sentiment is deteriorating—early Monday data shows that the total crypto market liquidation amount has reached $864 million.
The True Meaning of CEX Net Inflow Data
During periods of increased economic risk, capital flows into CEXs (centralized exchanges) often reflect investors’ actual actions. XWIN’s observation highlights a key phenomenon:
Phenomenon
Implication
Short-term CEX inflow increase
Consistent with temporary position adjustments
Inflows do not persist
No ongoing structural selling pressure
Short-term volatility
Investors are reducing short-term risk exposure
This reflects investors’ real mindset: facing increased economic uncertainty, they tend to reduce risk exposure in the short term. In this process, Bitcoin is often viewed as a liquid asset that can be temporarily sold to reduce portfolio risk, rather than a long-term store of value.
Short-term Adjustments vs. Long-term Allocation Divergence
This analysis reveals two forces within the market:
Short-term pressure: Economic risks lead investors to act quickly; the policy shocks from tariff policies are indeed pushing prices down. Related information shows that several whales have recently sold large positions; Bitcoin OGs, after holding for 12 years, sold some of their holdings, with single-day liquidations reaching hundreds of millions of dollars.
Long-term allocation: The lack of persistent CEX inflows indicates that the market has not formed a structural selling pressure. This suggests that institutions and long-term holders have not exited en masse. In fact, recent institutional allocation data shows that corporate Bitcoin treasuries are still accumulating; Metaplanet has joined the 10,000+ BTC club, and Strategy Inc. plans to buy over $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin in a new round.
Summary
This analysis offers an important perspective: Bitcoin’s recent decline has indeed been suppressed by tariff policies and economic risks, but the market has not fallen into sustained structural selling. The “short-term inflow but no continuation” characteristic of CEX data indicates that this is more a reaction to short-term risk avoidance rather than a change in long-term allocation intent. In other words, the market is experiencing a short-term correction, but the long-term interest in fundamental allocation remains. Moving forward, attention should be paid to whether the development of tariff policies and institutional allocation willingness will further adjust.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why is there no sustained selling pressure on Bitcoin despite the tariff hammer coming down?
Bitcoin has been declining continuously under the impact of Trump’s tariff policy, but on-chain data reveals an interesting contradiction: although exchange inflows temporarily increased, this inflow did not persist, suggesting a lack of sustained structural selling pressure in the market. CryptoQuant analyst XWIN’s latest analysis uncovers the market psychology behind this— a tug-of-war between short-term economic risk avoidance and long-term allocation interests.
How Tariff Policies Have Become a Recent Downward Pressure on Bitcoin
According to the latest news, the Trump administration has once again advanced tariff policies, which have become a clear bearish factor for Bitcoin since 2025. This policy impact influences the market through a clear transmission chain:
Data confirms this pressure. Currently, Bitcoin is priced at $89,067, down 2.42% in the past 24 hours, with a total decline of 6.21% over the past 7 days. This is not an isolated event; the overall market risk sentiment is deteriorating—early Monday data shows that the total crypto market liquidation amount has reached $864 million.
The True Meaning of CEX Net Inflow Data
During periods of increased economic risk, capital flows into CEXs (centralized exchanges) often reflect investors’ actual actions. XWIN’s observation highlights a key phenomenon:
This reflects investors’ real mindset: facing increased economic uncertainty, they tend to reduce risk exposure in the short term. In this process, Bitcoin is often viewed as a liquid asset that can be temporarily sold to reduce portfolio risk, rather than a long-term store of value.
Short-term Adjustments vs. Long-term Allocation Divergence
This analysis reveals two forces within the market:
Short-term pressure: Economic risks lead investors to act quickly; the policy shocks from tariff policies are indeed pushing prices down. Related information shows that several whales have recently sold large positions; Bitcoin OGs, after holding for 12 years, sold some of their holdings, with single-day liquidations reaching hundreds of millions of dollars.
Long-term allocation: The lack of persistent CEX inflows indicates that the market has not formed a structural selling pressure. This suggests that institutions and long-term holders have not exited en masse. In fact, recent institutional allocation data shows that corporate Bitcoin treasuries are still accumulating; Metaplanet has joined the 10,000+ BTC club, and Strategy Inc. plans to buy over $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin in a new round.
Summary
This analysis offers an important perspective: Bitcoin’s recent decline has indeed been suppressed by tariff policies and economic risks, but the market has not fallen into sustained structural selling. The “short-term inflow but no continuation” characteristic of CEX data indicates that this is more a reaction to short-term risk avoidance rather than a change in long-term allocation intent. In other words, the market is experiencing a short-term correction, but the long-term interest in fundamental allocation remains. Moving forward, attention should be paid to whether the development of tariff policies and institutional allocation willingness will further adjust.