When it comes to the contradiction between privacy protection and regulatory compliance, this has been a longstanding challenge in the blockchain space—many projects either pursue privacy excessively, risking regulatory issues; or prioritize transparency, leaving user privacy unaddressed. However, a Layer 1 project that has been exploring this problem since 2018 is Dusk, and today I want to share its approach with you.



Dusk's core logic is quite straightforward: why must privacy and compliance be at odds? They can coexist perfectly. The project employs a modular architecture design that directly incorporates privacy protection and auditability into the protocol. What does this mean? Transaction data is kept confidential for ordinary users, business information is protected, but regulatory agencies can access transparent data when needed to meet KYC, anti-money laundering, and other legal requirements. It may sound like an impossible feat, but technically, it is indeed achievable.

An interesting application is its use in real-world asset tokenization (RWA). Traditional financial assets like stocks, bonds, and funds can be securely moved onto the blockchain, enabling faster issuance and trading. Moreover, because of its built-in compliance features, these assets, once on-chain, won't cause trouble due to privacy concerns nor be questioned because of transparency issues. For institutional-level financial applications, this is a pretty good solution.

In essence, Dusk is building a bridge connecting traditional finance and the digital economy. Under its technical framework, asset digitization becomes both efficient and compliant with existing regulatory frameworks—this is likely a significant advantage for organizations aiming to operate within legal boundaries.
DUSK4,13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFT_Therapyvip
· 8h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? This idea sounds too idealistic; in practice, will it really work out? --- Dusk's approach is good, but the key is whether regulatory agencies will buy it or not. --- RWA on the chain is indeed the general direction, but I'm worried it will become a new tool for cutting leeks. --- They've been pondering this since 2018. What's the current status? Are there any real institutional users? --- Talking all fancy, but it's better to just look at whether the code can withstand an audit. --- Ultimately, projects like these can't avoid one question—what if regulatory attitudes change? No matter how strong the technology is, it won't help. --- Modular architecture sounds impressive, but how many projects in the crypto space have truly solved this contradiction? --- It's not that I don't trust, but solutions in this intermediate state often can't satisfy either side. --- If it can really reassure institutions to go on-chain, then its value definitely isn't just like it is now.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTradervip
· 8h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist peacefully? Easier said than done. Dusk's approach is quite innovative, and the RWA aspect is interesting. Wait, can it really ensure transparency to regulators while keeping user confidentiality? I need to review the code to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuruvip
· 8h ago
The idea behind Dusk sounds good, but very few projects can truly succeed. I'm a bit hopeful.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 9h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly be perfectly balanced? Just listen, the reality isn't that ideal. Dusk's approach is indeed innovative, but the implementation of RWA on the chain still depends on how it unfolds later. It's easy to say, but the key is having an ecosystem to support it. This logical framework might be accepted by institutions, but what about retail investors? It's 6202, and we're still discussing privacy vs. regulation. It feels like we'll never escape this cycle. Modular architecture sounds impressive, but how does it work in practice? Regulatory-compliant privacy coins have been explored before; everyone has a clear idea of how it ended up.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidationvip
· 9h ago
Wait, can privacy and compliance really coexist perfectly? That sounds a bit too ideal.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealervip
· 9h ago
Hey, Dusk's combination of privacy + compliance is indeed interesting. It feels like finally someone is seriously tackling this longstanding difficult problem.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)