It doesn't rely on sophisticated models or complex strategic theories; instead, it completely hands the decision-making power back to the users themselves.



Have you noticed that phrases like "get rich overnight" and "hundredfold returns" have become overused in the crypto ecosystem? These words are everywhere, and hearing them repeatedly can actually numb your senses. But if you look deeper into the real needs of ordinary users, it's actually much simpler—nothing more than wanting to participate more easily, use the platform more smoothly, and see more genuine results.

This is the thing that has been overlooked for a long time.

What does true low-threshold participation look like? Looking at the two extremes today makes it clear. One requires a large investment to ensure you get something; the other relies on luck, with a painfully low probability. Neither is ideal.

But have you ever thought about whether it's possible to carve out a new path between these two extremes?

Divide the product into multiple equal shares, each priced at $1. After selling all shares, the system randomly selects a lucky winner—this person obtains the product at the lowest cost. It sounds straightforward—no complicated rules, no need for tricks, and whether you participate or not is entirely up to you.

Here's the question: why can a $1 price point sustain itself instead of becoming a fleeting gimmick?

Many innovative approaches ultimately fail not because there's no interest, but because they struggle with sustainability. You need to think clearly about how long the entire mechanism can run and how long the user experience can be maintained; otherwise, once the hype fades, it will be completely cold. The reason this project dares to set such a price is because it connects supply and demand—merchants can quickly circulate inventory through this method, while users participate at very low cost, satisfying both sides.

Without relying on empty promises or complex financial designs, just this simple, straightforward logic might be the true direction that the crypto ecosystem needs.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegrettervip
· 10h ago
Hey, I finally saw someone mention this. I'm already tired of those hundredfold mythologies.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 10h ago
Hey, someone finally told the truth. This logic is indeed refreshing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustlervip
· 10h ago
Hey, no, finally someone explained it clearly. I'm just tired of those who hype up hundredfolds every day. It's really just 1 dollar per share. If you're lucky, you make a profit; if you're unlucky, you lose only 1 dollar. I respect this logic.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoardervip
· 10h ago
Well, at least someone is finally telling the truth. I'm tired of the nonsense about "hundredfold coins." The idea of 1 dollar is indeed bold—it's a gamble on whether it can survive the hype period. This is what product thinking is all about, not just to harvest quick profits. By the way, can supply and demand truly balance? It still seems to depend on execution. Simple things are the hardest to do; the lack of complicated tricks actually makes it easier to fail.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)