Privacy tracks have recently gained quiet momentum. Many are still focused on traditional privacy coin solutions, unaware that some projects have already completed their mainnet final sprint earlier this year.
To put it simply, traditional blockchains are like transparent safes—institutions want to put assets inside but are naturally repelled by open ledgers, fearing their cards and chips being seen through. These concerns directly block large capital from entering.
The real breakthrough lies in building a bridge between privacy and auditability. Some projects use zero-knowledge proof technologies (such as ZK-SNARKs, PLONK, etc.) to make transaction data appear as gibberish to the public, while remaining crystal clear from a regulatory perspective. This "compliant privacy" design has already attracted the attention of mainstream institutions—such as organizations like the Dutch Stock Exchange, which has directly put hundreds of millions of euros worth of securities assets on the chain.
Its role is not just as a Layer 1 protocol but more like a surgical knife swinging between compliance and decentralization, forcibly cutting through the deadlock of both. While the market is still discussing Ethereum's fragmentation issues, these types of projects have already achieved second-level clearing and settlement efficiency through innovative consensus mechanisms. For the competition of bringing real assets on-chain, compliance is the most solid key to opening institutional doors.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenDreamer
· 6h ago
Wow, someone finally explained this clearly—compliance and privacy are truly the keys for institutional entry.
Wait, can these zero-knowledge proof schemes really withstand scrutiny?
Dutch stock exchange going directly on-chain? Well, traditional finance is coming in.
Second-level clearing and settlement? If this really runs on the mainnet, Ethereum would be crying.
Everyone is trading privacy coins, but the real opportunity lies in compliant privacy.
Why do I feel this is just another overly hyped track?
Layer 1 protocols playing with scalpels, sounds impressive, but I wonder how genuine they are.
With such high institutional barriers, can retail investors get on board or not?
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 6h ago
The idea of compliant privacy sounds great, but do institutions really believe in the "full transparency" on the chain? Or is it just centralized auditing under a different guise?
Second-level clearing and settlement are indeed impressive, but can these projects survive the bear market first?
Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for so many years, but why haven't they seen large-scale adoption yet?
Billions of euros on the chain sound impressive, but is it just the Netherlands?
Feels like another story in the crypto world—wait until real big funds come in before believing.
This wave of privacy concept hype feels just like last year's DeFi and NFT trends.
Compliance and privacy sound like they aim to do both, but will reality be that ideal?
If I’m not mistaken, traditional privacy coin solutions are also evolving, so why were they suddenly declared dead?
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 6h ago
The compliance and privacy logic is truly outstanding, and institutions are all in on it.
ZK solutions should have taken off long ago; why are so many people still hyping outdated privacy coins?
Real-time clearing and settlement? If that can really be achieved, how will traditional exchanges survive?
The mainnet is already live and no one knows? Is it low-key or just not popular?
The Dutch stock exchange's move is indeed an overwhelming signal, major institutions are starting to believe.
Compliance is really the only way out; the talk about decentralization is increasingly sounding like idealism.
By the way, which specific projects are these? I always feel like the article is playing a riddle.
Privacy tracks have recently gained quiet momentum. Many are still focused on traditional privacy coin solutions, unaware that some projects have already completed their mainnet final sprint earlier this year.
To put it simply, traditional blockchains are like transparent safes—institutions want to put assets inside but are naturally repelled by open ledgers, fearing their cards and chips being seen through. These concerns directly block large capital from entering.
The real breakthrough lies in building a bridge between privacy and auditability. Some projects use zero-knowledge proof technologies (such as ZK-SNARKs, PLONK, etc.) to make transaction data appear as gibberish to the public, while remaining crystal clear from a regulatory perspective. This "compliant privacy" design has already attracted the attention of mainstream institutions—such as organizations like the Dutch Stock Exchange, which has directly put hundreds of millions of euros worth of securities assets on the chain.
Its role is not just as a Layer 1 protocol but more like a surgical knife swinging between compliance and decentralization, forcibly cutting through the deadlock of both. While the market is still discussing Ethereum's fragmentation issues, these types of projects have already achieved second-level clearing and settlement efficiency through innovative consensus mechanisms. For the competition of bringing real assets on-chain, compliance is the most solid key to opening institutional doors.