The dual transformation of the privacy track and the RWA market is reshaping the competitive landscape of the crypto ecosystem. Traditional privacy coins face global policy pressures due to their absolute anonymity features, while DUSK adopts a collaborative privacy solution that takes a different approach—finding a balance between privacy protection and regulatory compliance through a selective transparency mechanism. This design philosophy is becoming a favored direction among institutional investors.
Data speaks volumes. The global RWA market has surpassed $80 billion, and DUSK has already onboarded assets worth over €200 million. The underlying technology support is also robust: protocols like PLONK and recursive ZKP build an insurmountable technical barrier, creating a win-win situation among B-end institutions, C-end users, and the developer ecosystem.
From the token perspective, the ecological value cycle has taken shape. Staking mechanisms, fee distribution, governance rights, and other scenarios continue to capture value for the tokens. Interestingly, the current valuation shows a clear mismatch compared to the market opportunity of $80 billion, and institutional funds are accelerating their deployment. This round of value revaluation has come somewhat unexpectedly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkNoob
· 14h ago
The path of compliance and privacy is the right one; traditional privacy coins will eventually fail.
Selective transparency is indeed a clever compromise, but will institutions really buy in?
An 80 billion market valuation comparable to DUSK... how big is this price difference?
PLONK sounds impressive, but I wonder how it will actually be implemented.
2 billion euros in assets on the chain sounds like a lot, but what is the actual proportion?
The staking ecosystem looks promising, but the key is who will take over.
This wave of value revaluation is being accumulated by institutions; will retail investors chase the high or stay on the sidelines?
I am optimistic about the privacy track, but whether DUSK can become a leading project still depends on the outcome.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 14h ago
Privacy + RWA this combination is indeed interesting, but the concept of selective transparency... can it really please regulators? I always feel it has a bit of playing both sides.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 14h ago
Selective transparency? Isn't this just trying to have the best of both worlds? Frankly, it's just playing tai chi between policy and freedom.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 14h ago
The idea of collaborative privacy is really solid; it can last much longer than the absolute anonymity approach.
Valuation mismatch is indeed interesting, but it still depends on the actual flow of institutional funds.
With an 80 billion market benchmark, it feels like DUSK has just begun?
The staking ecosystem needs to get running; this determines whether it can hold up.
Don't just look at the data; the key is whether the compliance hurdle can be reliably cleared.
The dual transformation of the privacy track and the RWA market is reshaping the competitive landscape of the crypto ecosystem. Traditional privacy coins face global policy pressures due to their absolute anonymity features, while DUSK adopts a collaborative privacy solution that takes a different approach—finding a balance between privacy protection and regulatory compliance through a selective transparency mechanism. This design philosophy is becoming a favored direction among institutional investors.
Data speaks volumes. The global RWA market has surpassed $80 billion, and DUSK has already onboarded assets worth over €200 million. The underlying technology support is also robust: protocols like PLONK and recursive ZKP build an insurmountable technical barrier, creating a win-win situation among B-end institutions, C-end users, and the developer ecosystem.
From the token perspective, the ecological value cycle has taken shape. Staking mechanisms, fee distribution, governance rights, and other scenarios continue to capture value for the tokens. Interestingly, the current valuation shows a clear mismatch compared to the market opportunity of $80 billion, and institutional funds are accelerating their deployment. This round of value revaluation has come somewhat unexpectedly.