2026-01-21 11:54:11

I just recently saw through the core tactics of these projects—basically, it's about controlling the筹码.

Looking back at the chip distribution data of the October projects $giggle and $4 reveals the trick. The key observation lies in their last four rounds of operations, specifically the discard strategy. Discarding here means the main force abandons some chips at a certain stage to push the price up, then shifts focus to deeper control at more advantageous positions.

Why do this? Because complete monopoly over chips is less efficient than precise control. The main force doesn't need to hold 100% of the chips; as long as they control the liquidity at key price levels, they can steer the entire market trend. This is what we often call "chip control"—not absolute control, but strategic management.

From the chip distribution of $giggle and $4, it’s clear that the main force employed a "gradient relaxation" strategy in these four rounds. Early on, they tightly held the core chips; mid-stage, they gradually released some to retail investors and small institutions to create activity; in the final rounds, they used discard operations to shake out the market, clearing out floating chips following the trend.

The benefits of this approach are obvious: first, it reduces regulatory risks associated with excessive market manipulation; second, the shakeout process increases the cost for latecomers; third, it allows precise price pushes at critical moments, creating an illusion of "investment opportunities."

These last four rounds of discard are not forced but carefully designed. The main force knows exactly when to release and when to withdraw. Understanding chip distribution allows you to see through the true intentions of the project team and the main force.

GIGGLE-0,81%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TeaTimeTrader

· 6h ago

Another manipulation scheme, retail investors will always be the last bagholders. Damn, precise control sounds fancy, but basically it's just changing tactics to cut leeks. This gradient relaxation method is truly brilliant, making you feel like you've gained an opportunity. I also followed those two projects in October, and now I think back, I get chills. The main players are playing psychological games; we are just prey being led around. It's not that I don't want to make money, but I'm afraid that in the end, I'll realize I became the bagholder. So what if I see through it? What’s meant to come still will come, and you can't escape it. A carefully designed sacrificial pawn, sounds very dark haha. So, those who still dare to invest in such projects now are really warriors. Cleaning up the market and clearing floating chips, damn straight to the point.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 6h ago

It's the same old trick, tired of seeing it all the time. Shakeouts, controlling the funds, gradual relaxation... They sound professional but are actually just a roster for cutting leeks. But speaking of which, this giggle game is indeed interesting, and that wave of abandoned players' operations are truly clever. The main force has thoroughly understood retail investors' psychology and is always one step ahead of you.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 6h ago

It's the old routine again—gradient relaxation, precise control of the market. To put it nicely, it's just cutting leeks. After so many rounds, does anyone really believe that abandoning the position is "carefully designed"? That's hilarious. Retail investors are ultimately the bag holders. Everyone knows what it means to clear floating chips. I haven't looked closely at the data of $giggle and $4 , but I've heard this explanation countless times, always presented very professionally. The ones who truly make money are never the people who understand the chips.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 6h ago

Handshake, I've seen this routine before, it's just a different variation of cutting leeks. Retail investors are always the last to act, thinking they can make quick money but end up being the deepest trapped, how ironic. Data can be deceptive, but the distribution of chips can't be fooled. Once you see through this trick, you basically know how to survive. That's why I never chase highs, I wait for the shakeout to finish and then take a look. Anyway, you can't run away. The main force controlling the market hasn't changed; they just switch to a different coin name to continue the cut. Truly brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 6h ago

Ah... it's the same old story again. Watching it makes me numb. --- It's called controlling the funds nicely, but honestly, it's just a bad look. --- Holding tightly in the early days? Bro, your description sounds just like my holdings haha. --- Gradient relaxation? I feel like it's gradient cutting me instead. --- "The illusion of investment opportunities," this phrase is really spot on, hits right in the heart. --- Liquidity at key price levels... huh, it just means they can dump whenever they want. --- In October, those two projects, I didn't dodge even one. --- Understanding the distribution of chips can reveal intentions, so why am I still losing... --- Carefully designed sacrificial pawns, if not carefully done, can this game still be played? --- The regulatory risks are handled quite thoroughly. --- Every time they say "understand and you'll make money," but those who truly understand are already financially free. --- Retail investors entering later face higher costs, this is my self-cultivation course.

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 6h ago

Gradient relaxation? Basically, it's like nurturing a venomous insect. The main players are carefully cultivating their "investment opportunity flower."

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 6h ago

It's the same old trick again. When it comes to controlling the funds, it all boils down to being straightforward. Forget it, I'll just see if I missed the next trap. Are the big players really that smart? I feel like they're just messing around. So these two projects are both a setup. No wonder it all seems so coincidental. It sounds very professional, but I just want to know when I can double my money. The pawn strategy sounds impressive, but it's really just a way to trap retail investors' wallets. This analysis seems in-depth, but in reality, it's just armchair quarterbacking after the fact.

View OriginalReply0